Wisconsin Budget

Changes to Medicaid Leave Wisconsin Behind

American Health Care Act locks in Wisconsin’s lower federal funding

Donald Trump, Paul Ryan and Mike Pence. Photo from the Office of the Speaker of the House.

Donald Trump, Paul Ryan and Mike Pence. Photo from the Office of the Speaker of the House.

Without so much as a single public hearing, Congress is close to approving huge changes to Medicaid that substantially reduce spending and radically change how funding is allocated. One of the ways that those changes will hurt Wisconsin is by permanently penalizing states like ours that currently spend well below the national average for each person in Medicaid.

One aspect of this problem has gotten some press attention this week – the way that the new funding allocation will lock into place lower federal support for the 19 states, including Wisconsin, that did not take federal Medicaid expansion funds. Jason Stein’s June 13 article in the Journal Sentinel does a nice job of covering that issue.

However, an even more basic problem is that the new funding formula would be based on each state’s average spending per Medicaid participant, which will freeze into place the lower federal funding levels in states that have had very narrow benefits and also in states with more generous benefits but more efficient use of their funding. Wisconsin is in the second category — though there are ways that our economizing is keeping some recipients from receiving the care they need. But regardless of how our state has achieved its low spending per Medicaid participant, setting caps that lock in our lower federal support would penalize Wisconsin  for being a leader in holding down costs.

The most recent data, from 2014, shows that Wisconsin’s average spending per Medicaid participant has been near the bottom among all states. If the Medicaid changes are enacted, health care costs will increase faster than the federal funding, so Wisconsin will have to either slash spending by making cuts to eligibility or provider rates and services, or raise taxes to make up the difference. The states that have not already adopted some of the cost saving strategies used in our state won’t suffer as much from the capped spending growth proposed by American Health Care Act (AHCA) because those states can absorb some of the cuts by implementing reforms shown to be successful in Wisconsin.

As the following bar graph indicates, in 2014 our average annual spending per child in Medicaid was the second lowest in the nation. It was nearly $800, or 30.6%, below the national average.

Wisconsin's Average Spending per Child in Medicaid is the 2nd Lowest in the Nation (2014)

Wisconsin’s Average Spending per Child in Medicaid is the 2nd Lowest in the Nation (2014)

Wisconsin has fairly comprehensive Medicaid benefits for kids, except we lag behind most other states in making dental care available to low-income children, and we also struggle with a dearth of mental health services for kids. By basing our state’s future federal funding on current spending for children that is the second lowest nationally, the proposed formula in AHCA would preclude Wisconsin from closing the gaps in dental and mental health care  for kids.

Wisconsin’s spending rates for individuals with disabilities is also very low compared to other states. In 2014, our state had the fourth lowest per capita Medicaid spending for this population in the nation. This was about $5,100 (27%) below the national average. That difference may surprise some people because Wisconsin has been a leader in eliminating waiting lists and making home or community-based services available for people who need long-term care. However, it’s our leadership in developing cost-effective alternatives to institutional care that has brought down our average cost per person served.

Wisconsin's Average Spending per Disabled Individual in Mediacaid is the 4th Lowest in the Nation (2014)

Wisconsin’s Average Spending per Disabled Individual in Mediacaid is the 4th Lowest in the Nation (2014)

Care in the community is far less expensive than in nursing homes, and people in the community generally stay healthier. But by being one of the national leaders in the transition away from institutional care, Wisconsin could be penalized for decades to come because we would be permanently locked into having the 4th lowest federal reimbursement rate for Medicaid enrollees with disabilities.

The new Medicaid funding caps in the House version of AHCA would also be based on each state’s average spending for seniors and for other adults. The good news for Wisconsin taxpayers, at least until now, has been that we are well below the national average in those two categories (40th for seniors and 41st for other adults). But the bad news is that our state’s frugality or efficiency in Medicaid spending for those groups will penalize Wisconsin in the future, because our low federal reimbursement amounts will be locked into place.

It’s not too late for the Senate to stop the very harmful changes to Medicaid proposed in the House version of AHCA. But no tweaks to the formula to lessen the negative impact for Wisconsin will resolve the larger problem that the caps will gradually produce huge cuts to Medicaid and the rationing of health care services for vulnerable Americans — including seniors, people with disabilities and low-income kids and families.

The best move for the Senate is to defeat AHCA or at least pull out the changes to Medicaid. Such monumental changes that permanently alter the structure of Medicaid should not be advanced without public hearings, open committee meetings, and bipartisan debate.

3 thoughts on “Wisconsin Budget: Changes to Medicaid Leave Wisconsin Behind”

  1. Colin Stuart says:

    Just another brain-dead move by the GOP. Thanks guys.

  2. Rich says:

    Typo: “It was nearly $800” … should be “$1800”

  3. Mary Kay Wagner says:

    It is penny wise pound foolish healthcare thinking on the part of the GOP. The AHCA is returning our healthcare system to an unsustainable model. A model in which healthcare spending consisted of somewhere in the neighborhood of 25% of GDP. Before the ACA we were seeing insurance rate increases of 60% a year. That slowed to 20% after the ACA took affect. Still not where we should be but at least the rate of increase had slowed. We need to shift our healthcare system to one that promotes health rather than treats illness. This means that rewards have to be for achieving health. As long as rewards are service based, which is what the AHCA supports, we will have healthcare only for those wealthy enough to afford it. As the cost of healthcare continues to increase at rates of 60% or higher, more and more people in this country will not be able to afford healthcare and businesses will not be able to offer healthcare benefits and remain competitive. Building off the ACA was this country’s best chance at reforming our healthcare system. It was the nearest we have come to a bipartisan healthcare proposal in 100 years. The basic concept was initially proposed by the GOP. The fact they are so against it has more to do with their blind determination to discredit President Obama.

Leave a Reply

You must be an Urban Milwaukee member to leave a comment. Membership, which includes a host of perks, including an ad-free website, tickets to marquee events like Summerfest, the Wisconsin State Fair and the Florentine Opera, a better photo browser and access to members-only, behind-the-scenes tours, starts at $9/month. Learn more.

Join now and cancel anytime.

If you are an existing member, sign-in to leave a comment.

Have questions? Need to report an error? Contact Us