Mark Doremus
Flynn’s Force

The Milwaukee Police In Action

A ride-along shows how a traffic stop leads to a drug bust. Part I of a series.

By , Milwaukee Neighborhood News Service - Mar 19th, 2013 10:07 am
Sign-up for the Urban Milwaukee daily email
Milwaukee Police Department conducting a search.

Milwaukee Police Department conducting a search.

It started with a routine traffic stop on the evening of March 15, 2013. By midnight, officers had followed a lead from that stop to a stash of marijuana, a couple of guns, and a suspected low-level drug dealer.

Urban Milwaukee had a chance to observe this work in action, as this reporter did a “ride-along” with the police, to get a sense of how “data-driven” or “hot-spot” policing, a central tenant of police chief Edward A. Flynn‘s law enforcement philosophy, works in practice.

In this case, the police turned up a small amount of marijuana when they stopped the car for a potential traffic violation. But then, under questioning, one of the occupants of the car offered to make a deal. Go easy on me and I’ll give you a lead on a guy who’s a dealer.

“He says ‘I know this guy, here’s his name, here’s his address. He’s got guns there. He’s got weed there,'” said officer Michael Slomczewski, who was present at the traffic stop and at the later guns-and-drugs bust. This led to the arrest of a suspect we’ll call “Lamont” because his case is still developing.

“So we came here,” Slomczewski continued. “We knocked on the door. They let us in. I said to the suspect, ‘Hey, Lamont. This is why we’re here. We got your information. We got your picture. We got some reported drug activity here.'”

Slomczewski said Lamont admitted using marijuana — but denied selling drugs or having any weapons. Slomczewski then asked Lamont for permission to search the house for drugs and firearms. According to Slomczewski, Lamont signed a consent statement. Then the search, which involved a drug-sniffing dog, began.

According to police, the search turned up marijuana, scales, packing material — items consistent with sales — two firearms and, among other things, an extended magazine that holds 27 rounds.

After he was read his rights, Slomczewski said, Lamont made a voluntary statement and admitted he sold weed. “He manned up to that. He said, ‘Yeah, I sell some weed, when times are tough, to make ends meet.'” Lamont reportedly denied that he owned the guns, but according to Slomczewski he did say that he knew they were in the apartment.

“The information we got from the traffic stop was pretty spot on,” Slomczewski said. “It worked, nobody got hurt — and two more guns are off the street.”

The March 15 bust is a good illustration how Flynn’s aggressive policing philosophy can work — at least when all the pieces of the puzzle come together just right.

“To accomplish our mission to take on crime, fear and disorder head-on,” Flynn wrote, soon after taking over the chief’s job in January, 2008, “we are embracing a community-based, problem-oriented, data-driven policing strategy that emphasizes beat integrity, geographic accountability, the use of problem-solving techniques and a reliance on data to identify threats, measure the results of our interventions, and to hold ourselves accountable to each other and to our community.”

Flynn is not alone in this approach. Other big city police departments have attempted their own versions.

To advance his effort, Flynn combined officers from the Street Crimes Unit, Fugitive Apprehension, Tactical Enforcement, Motorcycle and Canine Units, Marine Operations and Mounted Patrol into a new team called the Neighborhood Task Force or “NTF.” He reduced the number of detectives in favor of more beat cops. And he put a new emphasis on data-driven policing, using a variety of computerized data streams to concentrate police officers in locations where, according to the best available information, crimes have occurred and are likely to occur again, because that’s where the criminals are operating.

Unlike other police officers, members of the NTF aren’t tied to any particular district. They move around as threats arise and reinforce existing police resources in troubled neighborhoods. Their mandate is to sweep into high-crime areas, as identified by real-time police data, and make things uncomfortable for the bad guys.

Based on direct observation during a ride-along with NTF officers, it appears that they spend much of their duty time simply cruising their assigned areas. They look for suspicious behavior. They roust panhandlers and potential troublemakers out of gas station parking lots. They stop vehicles that run stop signs, or have visible defects, or expired plates. They roll down the window and question people who are walking in the street.

The traffic stops, in particular, have been controversial: the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel did a story which found minorities were more likely to be stopped by police. Flynn’s response was that any disparity tends to reflect the make-up of neighborhoods where these crime hot spots are located.

Most of the time the stops produce nothing more than a reminder to walk on the sidewalk, or get that vehicle registration up to date, or pay those outstanding parking tickets, or just a friendly wave. But every once in a while the NTF officers stop somebody who’s wanted for a crime, or a probation or parole violation. Or they turn up a lead that can be developed into an arrest, as was the case with the March 15 guns-and-drugs bust. And this kind of proactive policing is at the heart of Flynn’s approach to crime-fighting.

This is Part 1 of a series on how the police department attempts to fight crime.

 

Categories: Flynn's Force

2 thoughts on “Flynn’s Force: The Milwaukee Police In Action”

  1. Tyrell Track Master says:

    What a sad waste of time and resources. Weed should be legal. If it were, this guy would be making an honest living and would have no need for the guns or the violence.

  2. Christina says:

    So I requested a video on the street light to prove my innocent but the cop who took the case didn’t cared to investigate or looked at the video and when court came, he lied that I didn’t state that the other driver multiply struck my car. Instead, he twisted my story saying I was using my car as a weapon. and then I was charged for something I didn’t do when the other person was the one who did it. If only he have gotten the video like I requested, it would of showed that the other driver were the suspect and I was the victim. Is this what justice has come to? I have always defended the cop and had high hope of the police. Now I am starting to question if they really wanted to better the world or just simply trying to get paid to do nothing… How does it make you feel when you let the criminal get away and charged the victim just because you didn’t feel like doing your job? Do you not care?

Leave a Reply

You must be an Urban Milwaukee member to leave a comment. Membership, which includes a host of perks, including an ad-free website, tickets to marquee events like Summerfest, the Wisconsin State Fair and the Florentine Opera, a better photo browser and access to members-only, behind-the-scenes tours, starts at $9/month. Learn more.

Join now and cancel anytime.

If you are an existing member, sign-in to leave a comment.

Have questions? Need to report an error? Contact Us