Patti Wenzel

Necessity vs. Luxury in the Milwaukee County budget

By - Nov 21st, 2010 04:00 am


Product photo from

The last time we left the Milwaukee County Board of Supervisors, they had added more than $7.4 million in spending to County Executive  Scott Walker’s 2011 budget, which had originally reduced the tax levy by $1 million from 2010.

The board borrowed $11 million to reopen an indoor pool on 22nd and Burleigh and to repair both Pulaski and Noyes pools, even though it violated a borrowing freeze it imposed on itself just last year. They added $139,000 to the budget to maintain the county’s fish hatchery. They added $250,000 to fund a universal screening program to determine the proper placement of those criminal suspects: the county jail or in the community.

They added funds to repair the HVAC systems at the Kosciuszko and King community centers. They added $1 million to the contingency fund, to cover employee concessions that may be denied by an arbitrator. They added $125,000 to continue an employment task force for men of color.

As is the process with the county executive form of governmental budgeting, Walker proposed and the board offered a counter-proposal. Walker vetoed 15 items from the board’s budget, restoring most of his original proposal and removing the pool spending and fish hatchery, leaving the board to find 13 supervisors to override the executive’s move.

Last week, the board did just that, overriding 11 of Walker’s 15 vetoes. So long, Mr. Walker. Don’t let the door hit ya on the way out.

Supervisors returned $5 million in borrowing for that long-closed pool. They restored the fish hatchery, the screening program, the contingency money, $40,000 to study whether to move South Shore Beach, and overturned Walker’s request for a pay freeze.

Instead, county workers will get a phased in 2 percent pay raise to help offset the 4 percent salary pension contributions and a slight increase in the employee health premium contribution.

County Board Chairman Lee Holloway, who will become the next executive on Dec. 29, said the board’s changes to Walker’s employee compensation package will make obtaining concession much easier.

“It’s clear that, after a long and difficult budget adoption meeting last week, the County Board came together in overriding more than two-thirds of Walker’s vetoes,” he said. “We believe this is a more achievable package to secure true wage and benefit reform. The wage and benefit concessions included in (Walker’s) recommended budget were not thought out as part of a long-term labor negotiation strategy and actually set up the County for failure in arbitration or in court. Our taxpayers cannot afford that, so the Board had to step up and make these responsible changes.”

Milwaukee County Chairman Lee Holloway

In the end, the 2011 property tax levy will increase 2.389 percent over 2010, increasing the average Milwaukee homeowner’s tax bill by $7.49.

I agree with the board that basing a budget on non-negotiated contract concessions is a big gamble, and one that taxpayers can’t afford. The accounting tricks employed by Walker for the past eight budgets have put Milwaukee County on the brink of bankruptcy and legal peril. The board got it right by increasing the contributions made by employees toward their benefits and tossing them a bone with a small pay raise to offset the pain.

It gives future negotiations with county unions a starting chance, and gives taxpayers a possible chance at real reforms in our public employee’s compensation package.

But the board may have overreached on discretionary items in this budget. Do we really need to reopen an indoor swimming pool that has been shuttered since 2001?  Do we really need to run a fish hatchery, when no other county in the state has one?  And do we need to have a task force specifically for men of color when there are thousands of people in our community in need of work and job skills — especially when the Task Force on Work Reform and Men of Color has not submitted any type of plan or report during the three years it has been in existence.

Instead, they should have stuck to the county’s needs and not its “wants” — just as their constituents have been doing during this economic crisis. Restoring bus service to under-served communities is a necessity. But adding $5 million to the credit card bill for a pool that hasn’t been used in nine years is a luxury we just can’t afford.

0 thoughts on “Necessity vs. Luxury in the Milwaukee County budget”

  1. Anonymous says:

    Scott Walker could have brought $20 to $30 million of revenue into the County by swapping out some property taxes and swapping in a one percent sales tax for transit and parks. The $20+ million would be from sales in the County to visitors, commuters, tourists. His bragging about reducing his budget by $1 million disguises his hope that we will forget: The voters of the County asked for the tax swap. Walker has done all he can do to help us forget. But the homeowner will continue to bear the brunt of the County budget, with no relief from the renter, from the visitor, from the commuter, from the tourist – all of whom use our facilities for free.

Leave a Reply

You must be an Urban Milwaukee member to leave a comment. Membership, which includes a host of perks, including an ad-free website, tickets to marquee events like Summerfest, the Wisconsin State Fair and the Florentine Opera, a better photo browser and access to members-only, behind-the-scenes tours, starts at $9/month. Learn more.

Join now and cancel anytime.

If you are an existing member, sign-in to leave a comment.

Have questions? Need to report an error? Contact Us