Tom Strini
Review

The MSO, Trpceski and Saint-Saens

By - May 28th, 2010 04:32 pm
Sign-up for the Urban Milwaukee daily email

None of the composers in the Western classical pantheon are bad. But some are better than others, for reasons some of us can spell out.

Camille Saint-Saens. Wikipedia Commons photo.

Friday, music director Edo de Waart devoted an entire Milwaukee Symphony program to Camille Saint-Saens (1835-1921).  I’m not alone in placing the French third-generation Romantic in the rear guard of Greatness. On a workaday level, I always thought he relied far to much on sequences — play a tune or fragment then play it again at a different pitch level — to extend ideas and build tension.This obvious trick often yields tedious results.

On a deeper level, previous generations of Romantics hammered out a musical language that expressed their moment; Saint-Saens did not. He received that language and manipulated it expertly. He was marvelously articulate, but had nothing of his own to say often went for cheap, spectacular effects. His music is to Romanticism what the Las Vegas Luxor Hotel is to ancient Egypt.

As Danse macabre, Opus 40, the Piano Concerto No. 2 and the Organ Symphony (No. 3, in C minor) passsed by at the MSO matinee Friday, I had plenty of time to revisit my opinion of this composer’s music. I was right; Saint-Saens does use too many sequences and his music doesn’t run very deep.  He loves to end with a bang; you get the feeling he composed those endings with standing ovations in mind, in a way that a true heavyweight — Brahms, say — would not.

But what’s the point in resisting such music? In any case, it is irresistible when played as brilliantly as it was Friday. It was fun to hear Frank Almond, the MSO’s concertmaster, dig in at the bridge to give a devilish snarl to the big solo violin part of Danse macabre.

The rhythmic precision De Waart and the orchestra brought to all this music, particularly to the Organ Symphony, brought out metric subtleties that had previously escaped me. All sorts of ingenious combinations and juxtapositions of duple and triple feeling, many deep in the orchestral mix, jumped out of this reading. I’m thinking especially and the cartoonish trio in the third movement, but it permeated the whole piece. De Waart balanced the orchestra to make all this legible. He also managed tempos and volumes to a razor’s edge to create enormous momentum overall and a world of subtle surges and subsidences along the way.

The trick to the concerto lies in making the insanely difficult solo piano part sound easy. Soloist Simon Trpceski soared high above the technical difficulties and played joyfully. He generated enormous power without banging and enormous speed with no sense of haste or any loss in articulation. He was fleet and light and witty in the Scherzando — people chuckled at the musical punch line at the very end — and was fleet and driven and powerful in the presto finale. My favorite among the many jaw dropping details in Trpceski’s performance came in the odd theme made of strings of very fast trills and shakes. Trpceski endowed every last one of them with rhythmic clarity down to the nanosecond. Instead of blurs, they were showers of diamonds, with each facet cut just so.

Of course de Waart, the MSO and Trpceski were more than up to Saint-Saens’ big finish, which is of course the stuff of standing ovations. They got a rousing one from the big afternoon crowd, and they earned it. So did Saint-Saens. Maybe his music is all surface, but my goodness, what a glittering, dazzling surface it is.

This program, give at Marcus Center Uihlein Hall, will be repeated at 8 p.m. Saturday, May 29. For ticket information, call the Marcus Center box office, 414-273-7206 or visit the MSO website.

Click here to read an interview with Simon Trpceski.

NOTE: Click here for the review of  MSO violinist Ilana Setapen’s Friday-night recital.

0 thoughts on “Review: The MSO, Trpceski and Saint-Saens”

  1. Anonymous says:

    Loved the show – all three – Simon’s enjoyment of the performance – and good to hear a little more of that beautiful organ (still wish to hear it really get played, but don’t know what to suggest – except for Rick Wakeman’s Jane Seymour). Thanks for the Ilana tip – didn’t know. Have to run….to catch it. -R

  2. Anonymous says:

    Thanks for commenting, Robert. But, um, Jane Seymour? — Tom

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *