U.S. Supreme Court Limits EPA Ability to Fight Climate Crisis
Court decision restricts future EPA regulation of power plant carbon emissions under the Clean Air Act
Today the U.S. Supreme Court restricted some of the Environmental Protection Agency’s authority to limit carbon emissions from power plants—just as the window to avert the worst impacts of climate change is beginning to close. Currently, the EPA has no rule in place dealing with power plant carbon emissions, but in an unusual move, the high court is setting a precedent meant to impact any future rules created by the agency.
“In a textbook example of judicial activism, the Court has issued an opinion about a rule that doesn’t exist, in order to preemptively restrict the rule that the Biden administration is still drafting,” said Katie Nekola, General Counsel for Clean Wisconsin.
Now, even though no rule is in place, the U.S. Supreme Court is scrapping some tools the EPA could have used to regulate power plant emissions.
“Most states and electric utilities want to reduce carbon emissions,” Nekola says. “With this ruling, the Court chose to side with the narrow, self-serving interests of the dying coal industry rather than allow states to use a variety of smart, economical tools to reduce power plant pollution.”
Under the Obama rule, states had been able to meet rule requirements and effectively reduce emissions by encouraging power companies to shift generation from higher emitting sources, like coal and gas, to cleaner sources like solar and wind. Today, the Supreme Court took that ability away.
Transitioning away from burning coal and gas to clean renewable energy in Wisconsin will not only impact greenhouse gas emissions, it will also save as much as $2.75 billion in health costs every year and hundreds of lives.
Nekola says Clean Wisconsin and its partners will continue to be involved as the Biden Administration sets its new emissions rule, and even with today’s ruling, there is still an opportunity for the EPA to set strong standards for fossil fuel-burning power plants. But she says the precedent set by the court today is concerning.
“A rule was coming that the coal industry didn’t like, and the Court jumped in to stop it. That’s really troubling. And it could have implications for other federal agencies that are charged with setting rules and regulations,” she says. “How many other regulations will the Court step in to stop?”
Clean Wisconsin joined environmental groups and trade organizations from across the country to file briefs in the case, including:
Environmental Defense Fund
NRDC (Natural Resources Defense Council)
Sierra Club
Clean Air Task Force
American Lung Association
American Public Health Association
Appalachian Mountain Club
Clean Air Council
Conservation Law Foundation
Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy
Chesapeake Bay Foundation
Center for Biological Diversity
Environmental Law & Policy Center
Advanced Energy Economy
Solar Energy Industries Association
American Clean Power Association
NOTE: This press release was submitted to Urban Milwaukee and was not written by an Urban Milwaukee writer. While it is believed to be reliable, Urban Milwaukee does not guarantee its accuracy or completeness.
Mentioned in This Press Release
Recent Press Releases by Clean Wisconsin
DNR issues Environmental Impact Statement for Line 5 pipeline
Sep 12th, 2024 by Clean WisconsinAgency will now decide whether to allow construction of the controversial pipeline
New EPA Power Plant Rules Will Save Lives in Wisconsin
Apr 25th, 2024 by Clean WisconsinNew standards will slash carbon, coal ash, mercury, contaminated wastewater and other toxic pollution from power plants.