Joe Davis, Sr.
Press Release

After further review: Policies on why and when to deploy police body cameras need to be vetted

Statement of Alderman Joe Davis, Sr. September 2, 2015

By - Sep 2nd, 2015 04:47 pm

The proposed purchase of body cameras for the entire patrol division of the Milwaukee Police Department is a foolish idea. Recent instances in which the department has experienced critical technology failures should absolutely cause us to move forward cautiously. If the crash of a system like MediaSolv can compromise critical data for law enforcement and the judicial system, we should be asking serious questions about the reliability and practicality we would be getting for our investment of taxpayer dollars. This is just one reason why I think a pilot program would be a better means of moving forward.

Another concern is that individual officers will be given the discretion to turn the cameras on or off as circumstances dictate. Given the extremely stressful conditions that our officers have to endure amid the current increase in violent crime, we don’t know whether such a policy would be an effective use of this technology.

It seems to me that by giving officers the discretion to turn their cameras off, we are also undermining one of the most important goals of this initiative—earning the trust of our minority communities and bridging the divide between police and people of color. The technology exists to activate and deactivate the cameras automatically, based on proximity to the squad car, but the mayor’s initiative fails to explore that option.

Until the department has a set of procedures in place and policies established, this proposal from the mayor is another attempt to spend tax dollars like a drunken sailor. I am confident that my colleagues on the Common Council will see through this irrational proposal and choose to pursue well-defined outcomes and objectives, instead of an overtly political response to a public safety crisis.

Mentioned in This Press Release

2 thoughts on “After further review: Policies on why and when to deploy police body cameras need to be vetted”

  1. I disagree with Ald. Davis because although I recorded Police Officer Joseph Anderer breaking my camera as I recorded him, he claimed that other things happened off camera that justified his actions. The city ended up settling my civil rights lawsuit for thousands of dollars but my camera was worth only $300. Regardless of the ways the police may find to cheat, if the officer turns off a body camera then the citizen who has recorded an incident has the evidence and any claims by the officer of what occurred off-camera will seem less credible. In addition, until the city starts firing the bad cops like Anderer who keep getting in trouble and who violate civil rights, the body camera will be the public’s only defense against false claims and prosecutions. And until the city court and judges like Phillip M. Chavez — and the non-lawyer ex-cops who fill in as judges — start allowing discovery so citizens can prove their cases when falsely charged, the deck is stacked against the public.

  2. David says:

    WTF is this? An appeal to the am radio voters? Earth to , dumbass….there aren’t that many of them in the City and Donovan already has the lunatic vote wrapped up. Try representing your constituents instead of this pathetic pandering. Because officers can turn off their cameras (which I don’t like), we should throw the baby out with the bath water? Please!

Leave a Reply

You must be an Urban Milwaukee member to leave a comment. Membership, which includes a host of perks, including an ad-free website, tickets to marquee events like Summerfest, the Wisconsin State Fair and the Florentine Opera, a better photo browser and access to members-only, behind-the-scenes tours, starts at $9/month. Learn more.

Join now and cancel anytime.

If you are an existing member, sign-in to leave a comment.

Have questions? Need to report an error? Contact Us