Evers Could Boost the Business Sector
His promise to be “business friendly” and emphasize entrepreneurship could help state.
Gov. Tony Evers appears to have figured out that a pro-growth posture will be good for his Democratic Party. There has been a death of pro-growth Democrats for a couple of decades, and it hasn’t helped the party or the state.
It doesn’t take a rocket economist realize that Evers’ ambitions for more spending/investment on education, health care and roads will require a thriving private economy, from whence all tax revenues flow. As he drafts his first budget, that reality must have come home to him.
So our new governor has changed the tune from his campaign. Post inauguration, he has promise to be business friendly, and we have to take him at this word until proven otherwise.
He has spoken up for the need to further stimulate the economy through entrepreneurship. The Wisconsin economy needs reinvention, and it’s people with the guts and imagination to launch new ventures that do just that.
Most noticeably, Gov. Evers has backed off his campaign promise to eliminate the Wisconsin Economic Development Corporation, a public-private entity that was created under former Gov. Walker to stimulate job creation.
Less visible has been WEDC’s other work. It has done an efficient job of administering the state’s unique Act 255 tax credits of 25% for investments in new ventures. Act 255 has worked smoothly and effectively without a lot of bureaucratic friction. Venture capital investment has roughly doubled over the last five years, hitting a record $254 million in 2018. But we still rank at best in the middle of the states on levels of venture investment, and Madison is still the main beneficiary of startup subsidies. Milwaukee is slowly gaining.
The program has worked so well that proposals are floating in Madison to raise the credit to 40%. That would really put Wisconsin on the map as a place to start a high-growth company.
As an angel investor with 19 early stage investments under my belt, please believe me that these new ventures are highly risky. Each one is like having a teenager in your house.
When a new venture hits, the ones you hear about, the returns are high. And the economy is reconfigured. But a majority of them fail or provide minimal returns. De-risking the early investments by 40% would make a huge difference.
Further, it’s an area where the governor and Republican legislative leaders might find common ground.
WEDC has also led the way on identifying new economic clusters that show promise for diversifying the economy beyond its traditional economic strengths of manufacturing and agri-business. The agency provided seed funding, for instance, for the merging fresh water technologies cluster in the Milwaukee Region. It also helped formation of the Food and Beverage Cluster in the M7 Region.
The hallmark of the Walker years on the economic side was to double down on manufacturing. That includes signature moves on removing the corporate tax on manufacturing and agri-business companies and the Foxconn subsidy.
In the end, during the Walker eight years, Wisconsin rode the national boom to low unemployment, but produced only half as much job growth as then national average. Walker delivered 250,000 new jobs in eight years versus his goal of doing it in four years. Labor shortages curtailed some job growth.
Gov. Evers should learn from that concentrated strategy that the Wisconsin economy needs more diversification toward the service industries.
Think about what the late George Dalton started when he started Fiserv in 1984. Fiserv, a huge financial services company, just made a $22 billion acquisition. The combined company will hopefully be headquartered here, as is Northwestern Mutual in its new $400 million headquarters in downtown Milwaukee.
From the governor’s bully pulpit, Evers could shine the light forward for a broader economic base, led by entrepreneurs. No governor has ever made such a speech.
John Torinus is the chairman of Serigraph Inc. and a former Milwaukee Sentinel business editor who blogs regularly at johntorinus.com.
Op-Ed
-
Unlocking Milwaukee’s Potential Through Smart Zoning Reform
Jul 5th, 2024 by Ariam Kesete -
We Energies’ Natural Gas Plans Are A Mistake
Jun 28th, 2024 by John Imes -
Milwaukee Needs New Kind of School Board
Jun 26th, 2024 by Jordan Morales
So, in summary, the last two columns by Torinus……
1) The movie industry was mean to war criminal Dick Cheney (Torinus would call him a patriot for some reason)
2) It’s too early to tell if the FoxConn deal is a “winner or loser”, we will need 5 years or so. In the meantime Evers should continue to serve business interests at the expense of everyone else (just like Walker did).
I always get confused when I read a Torinus column, like I have entered some alternate reality.
Agree totally Duane. What has the “pro-business” stance of Walker done for working Wisconsinites? The promised 250,000 jobs never materialized. Wisconsin lags between most of the country (and particularly our neighboring states) in both job growth and economic recovery. Walker promised to support small businesses and entrepreneurial activity. Instead, his policies focused on major corporations (especially those that generously donated to his campaign funds.) The business tax breaks and deregulation may have helped corporate donors see greater profits. The average Wisconsinite paid the price with lower wages, higher tax burden and contaminated air and water.
I am sick to death of this “pro business” government to the exclusion of everyone else. Minnesota raised taxes 2 percentage points on corporation and the very wealthy (went from 34% to 36% rate). They are now beating the pants off of Wisconsin in terms of job growth, economic development, healthcare and education. The entrepreneurial engine of the University of Minnesota wasn’t hamstrung the way Walker hamstrung the University of Wisconsin. The end result, Minnesota has a dynamic and growing economy while Wisconsin’s limps along.
Be honest John Torinus, you are not so much in favor of a “pro business” stance as much as a “give all the benefits to the wealthiest.” Shades of Carnegie, Rockefeller and Morgan, but even they came to realize that a continued obscene wealth gap would lead to revolution.