Bruce Murphy
Murphy’s Law

Who’s Ahead in Wisconsin Supreme Court Election?

What do the polls show? How big will turnout be?

By - Mar 28th, 2025 12:06 pm
Dane County Judge Susan Crawford, left, and former Attorney General Brad Schimel, right, are running for a seat on the Wisconsin Supreme Court in April 2025. Photos courtesy of the Crawford and Schimel campaigns

Dane County Judge Susan Crawford, left, and former Attorney General Brad Schimel, right, are running for a seat on the Wisconsin Supreme Court in April 2025. Photos courtesy of the Crawford and Schimel campaigns

The race for Wisconsin Supreme Court, between the liberal candidate Susan Crawford, and the conservative candidate Brad Schimel, is likely to be very close. That’s about the only thing Democratic Party of Wisconsin Chair Ben Wikler and GOP chair Brian Schimming agreed on in an interview with WISN’s Upfront show.

Both also talked about signs there would be a big turnout for their side. As big as the turnout was in the April 2023 race for Wisconsin Supreme Court won by the liberal candidate Janet Protasiewicz, most are expecting even bigger numbers this year.

Who is ahead in the race? That depends on what poll you’re looking at and when it was conducted.

A poll by the conservative news site TIPP Insights, which surveyed 1,045 registered voters from February 7 to February 11, showed the race tied, with each candidate receiving 38 percent of the vote, as Newsweek reported.

The respected Marquette Law School poll conducted a survey between February 19-26 among 864 registered voters and found that 29 percent of respondents viewed Schimel favorably and 32 percent viewed him unfavorably, while 19% viewed Crawford favorably and 23% percent unfavorably. Thirty-eight percent said they don’t know enough about Schimel to make a decision about him, while 58% said they don’t know enough about Crawford to form an opinion. Marquette pollster Charles Franklin said there were too many without an opinion to try to handicap the race.

An RMG Research poll just after this, among 800 registered voters from February 25 to February 28, showed Crawford ahead by 42% to 35%, with 17% undecided, Newsweek reported.

About two weeks later a poll of 600 likely voters on March 9-10 conducted by OnMessage Inc. for the conservative Wisconsin Manufacturers & Commerce showed Crawford and Schimel both at 47%, with 5% of voters unsure.

The most recent poll, by SoCal Strategies, conducted between March 25-26 among 500 registered and likely voters, gave Crawford a 50-42 lead over Schimel. The poll showed Crawford had a small lead among white voters and a huge lead among Black voters, with Hispanic voters evenly divided.

In the WISN interview Wikler referenced America PAC, the group funded by billionaire Elon Musk: “His group just released a polling memo that put Brad Schimel five points behind if I read that right,” Wikler said.

All told the polls have mostly favored Crawford, but she started ahead of Schimel in total campaign funding and has fallen behind in the last few weeks. As of yesterday, the Associated Press reported, some $82 million had been spent on the campaign, with experts predicting the final tally will hit $100 million, shattering all previous records for a state judicial election. With the help of more than $13 million in spending by billionaire Musk, Schimel is winning the money battle.

“Schimel and his allies, which include groups backed by Musk, have spent about $46 million, while Crawford and her supporters have spent about $36 million,” the AP noted.

With Donald Trump endorsing Schimel and Musk bankrolling him, Republicans are betting the spring election will echo the results in November, when Trump won by a tiny margin, just 30,000 votes. But this will have a smaller turnout than a presidential election, meaning it will all come down to which party has a better turnout operation. And that’s something the polls can’t predict.

If you think stories like this are important, become a member of Urban Milwaukee and help support real, independent journalism. Plus you get some cool added benefits.

Categories: Politics

Comments

  1. carolsklenicka says:

    Thanks for the update, Bruce. The whole country is watching this one.

  2. snowbeer says:

    Another thing that’s for sure is schimel will claim fraud from “ballot dumps” in Milwaukee despite it being completely normal, explainable, and even avoidable if his allies would allow it.

  3. TosaGramps1315 says:

    You know things are not going well for BS Brad when Leon is leaving the DOGEbags to come to Wisconsin to jump around for him.
    Also, I pray that most voters do just a little research on candidates prior to voting, and not allow the content of 30-second TV commercials convince them of all they need to know. (Although, the spot one of the PACs is airing spots stating Frump supports BS Brad, but allocates the majority of its content stating that if Susan Crawford wins he will not be able to further his agenda here in Wisconsin.)
    Not sure if reTrumplicans are able to read the room, given how pissed off so many people are about what he and co-president Mush have done in just 2 months, and the way they have done it. Even Frumpers are PO’d. Could this messaging backfire, mobilizing more people to vote for Crawford?

  4. jsalmon1159 says:

    Liberals lie about Schimel to cover for Crawford’s horrible record:

    She let convicted criminals who raped children out early
    She opposed Act 10
    She fought photo ID to vote
    She will not take a stand to protect women in sports
    She sides with an official who refuses to work with ICE to deport dangerous criminals
    She got 77% of her donations from outside WI

  5. TosaGramps1315 says:

    jsalmon:

    I am not a liberal. I am a registered independent voter.

    I am writing to inform you that there is a cure for the Kool-Aid you very obviously enjoy drinking, which is supplied daily to you and your fellow cultists from the chalice of Frump/Mush/Fox “News”. It’s a thing called common sense. Try applying it with regard to what is going on between Frump, Mush and BS Brad. Voters can see what is happening, hear what’s been said, and make valid decisions using basic critical thinking skills. Simple logic. Being able to easily draw a line from Point A to Point B and conceptualize likely consequences. I suggest you try it sometime. It’s pretty cool.

    No candidate is perfect, and Susan Crawford likely isn’t. But if I could I would vote for her over BS Brad every day, and twice on Sunday knowing who is backing him and what they expect from him if he wins. That’s more Frump/Mush chaos that includes making lives worse than they are now.

  6. Badger Pete says:

    I’ve got news for you, jsalmon1159 — you can dig into the records of BOTH candidates and find hard cars which look poorly decided.

  7. Badger Pete says:

    Hard CASES, not cars!

Leave a Reply

You must be an Urban Milwaukee member to leave a comment. Membership, which includes a host of perks, including an ad-free website, tickets to marquee events like Summerfest, the Wisconsin State Fair and the Florentine Opera, a better photo browser and access to members-only, behind-the-scenes tours, starts at $9/month. Learn more.

Join now and cancel anytime.

If you are an existing member, sign-in to leave a comment.

Have questions? Need to report an error? Contact Us