Huge Racial Gap for Pandemic Jobless Aid
State’s Black applicants half as likely to get unemployment aid as whites, federal audit finds.
A federal audit has uncovered what researchers into Wisconsin’s unemployment insurance system have long suspected: People of color are less likely to receive jobless compensation than their white counterparts.
But a June report by the Government Accountability Office — a nonpartisan watchdog that reports to Congress — found that Wisconsin was among the slowest to begin paying federal pandemic unemployment relief, and whites received compensation at twice the rate of Black claimants. Native American and Hispanic applicants were also less likely than white claimants to receive help.
The report examined how Wisconsin and four other states — Arizona, Louisiana, New York and North Dakota — implemented Pandemic Unemployment Assistance (PUA). Congress created the program in 2020 to aid self-employed and part-time workers who lost work but wouldn’t otherwise qualify for regular compensation. It has paid out at least $131 billion nationwide.
The Wisconsin data covered January 2020 through April 2021, when the state’s unemployment insurance system buckled under a pandemic stress test, leaving many jobless residents to miss bill payments, rack up credit card debt, face eviction — and even homelessness.
It took Wisconsin two months to begin distributing PUA following Congressional approval. DWD reported making its first payments on May 21, 2020, but paid fewer than 1,000 claimants by the month’s end, according to the GAO.
Only North Dakota (34.8%) granted a lower percentage of overall claims compared to Wisconsin (38.1%). The two states also saw the most severe racial disparities in payouts, the audit found.
In Wisconsin, 43.3% of white claimants received PUA payments, compared to 21.9% of Black claimants, 24.8% of Hispanic claimants, 27.2% of Native American claimants and 41.8% of Asian claimants.
The figures add to a lengthy list of racial disparities in Wisconsin, which has some of the country’s starkest inequities in education, public health, housing, criminal justice and income.
People should receive unemployment benefits based on need and not “because of the color of their skin,” U.S. Secretary of Labor Marty Walsh told Wisconsin Watch. “We have to be equal across the board.”
He says the Labor Department welcomes the audit and is looking into its recommendations.
“One of the things that we’re doing, quite honestly, is acknowledging and identifying the challenges that we see in the system,” he added.
One of those recommendations is for President Joe Biden’s administration to study what happened in the early months of the pandemic to help states avoid future snafus.
The Labor Department agreed with a GAO recommendation to advise Congress on future options to help unemployed freelancers and other contingent workers. It partially agreed with the audit’s call to examine the reasons for racial disparities in pandemic aid, but expressed concern that doing so would distract from other efforts to improve equity.
DWD officials told auditors that they could not explain Wisconsin’s racial inequities in disbursing federal pandemic relief.
“Officials stated that their IT system does not capture the reason for denial of claims, and that they would need to examine each PUA application manually,” the report said.
Late last week, DWD announced a $3 million “UI Navigator” partnership with United Migrant Opportunity Services to boost aid access to migrant and seasonal farmworkers workers, non-English speakers and other workers who face persistent poverty and inequality. The federal Labor Department is funding the partnership, along with similar new programs in six other states.
“The Department of Workforce Development strives to make Wisconsin a fair and just place for all people to live and work. This includes eliminating racial and ethnic disparities while advancing equity and economic opportunity through workforce development,” Jennifer Sereno, a DWD spokesperson, said in a statement that called PUA “a new federal program with entirely distinct eligibility criteria.”
Sereno added: “Disparate access to information, technology, documentation, and challenges with validating applicant information can affect the implementation and outcomes of support programs.”
Critics of Wisconsin’s approach to unemployment insurance have warned of such barriers for years.
Madison attorney Victor Forberger has represented dozens jobless clients struggling to receive unemployment aid — even before the pandemic. He said Wisconsin’s complex claims filing process might explain some inequities.
DWD in late 2020 announced a plan to simplify application language, which Forberger says falls short. And it recently updated its online claimant portal that allows people to submit documents online instead of mailing or faxing them.
The agency says it also aims to ease filing for people without internet access. DWD has also taken initial steps to update its 1970s-area IT system, but doing so is expected to take years and cost about $90 million.
Forberger said the federal government requires state unemployment systems to avoid discriminating against people with disabilities, people of color and those who don’t speak English.
“And the feds need to start enforcing those requirements, and they’ve not been enforcing those requirements nearly to the extent that they need to,” he said.
The nonprofit Wisconsin Watch (www.WisconsinWatch.org) collaborates with WPR, PBS Wisconsin, other news media and the University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Journalism and Mass Communication. All works created, published, posted or disseminated by Wisconsin Watch do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of UW-Madison or any of its affiliates.
-
Wisconsin Lacks Clear System for Tracking Police Caught Lying
May 9th, 2024 by Jacob Resneck -
Voters With Disabilities Demand Electronic Voting Option
Apr 18th, 2024 by Alexander Shur -
Few SNAP Recipients Reimbursed for Spoiled Food
Apr 9th, 2024 by Addie Costello
Jeremey….. including this chopshop writing as filler on a slow news day devalues your site. this article is borderline F News.
Mr. Resneck-
#1. Do you realize that 100% of the states with the PUA data that you claim represents racism were led by a Dem Governor during the pandemic…. and that 100% of the non-racist states had a republican governor? you’re kinda punching yourself in the face with this piece…..
but, on a more serious note….
#2 on nearly every page of the GAO report referenced, officials stated that “fraudsters” using stolen identities is the most likely reason the raw data presents the appearance of racial disparities. I repeat, on nearly every page of the report fraud is highlighted as the most likely reason!
The word “fraud” is used 76 times in the GAO report!!
….can you explain your reasoning to completely neglect what appears to be the most significant fact of the report??
in case you didn’t get paste the Exec Summary on the report’s cover page…. I’ve pasted 2 examples below…
“officials stated that fraudulent claims could
affect the PUA benefit receipt rates observed in their state data. For example, to the extent individuals submitting fraudulent PUA claims disproportionately used identities stolen from Black or Hispanic/Latino
individuals relative to a state’s PUA applicants, and the state denied them, it could appear as though Black or Hispanic/Latino applicants received PUA benefits at a lower rate. However, we did not examine rates of potential fraud across demographic groups”
“North Dakota officials stated that the percentage of Black PUA applicants in the data they provided us (22.4 percent) may be higher than the actual Black PUA claim filing
population in the state and disproportionate to the number of Black individuals living in the state, potentially indicating fraudsters claiming PUA disproportionately chose that race.”