Johnson Doubles Down Against Child Care Aid
Taking care of children isn't 'society's responsibility,’ Senator insists.
U.S. Sen. Ron Johnson said he is “happy to defend” his statement that it isn’t “society’s responsibility to take care of other people’s children.”
On Tuesday, the Oshkosh Republican told La Crosse TV station WKBT that he opposes government support to help families pay for child care, a key legislative priority for Democrats. His statement suggesting that there is no collective responsibility to children generated instant controversy.
“I don’t think it should be controversial to say that parents should have the primary responsibility for taking care of their children,” Johnson said. “I don’t think it should be controversial to be concerned about being $29 trillion in debt, and additional deficit spending that would be sparked by even more federal government programs that we can’t afford.”
For much of 2021, President Joe Biden and Democrats in Congress worked on a large social spending bill that included many different provisions, including policies they said would expand access to affordable child care. Democratic negotiations on the bill appeared to break down in December, in part over spending concerns by conservative Democratic senators. No Republicans in the Senate supported the bill.
In Wisconsin, a shortage of reliable and high-quality day care predated COVID-19, and the demands that came with the pandemic has tended to make care less reliable and more expensive. According to a 2020 analysis by the liberal Economic Policy Institute, the average cost for infant care in Wisconsin is more than $12,500 per year; care for a 4-year-old costs an average of more than $10,000 per year.
Johnson’s statements to WKBT were seized on by Democrats who said they illustrated his lack of concern for the financial pressures many families experience around child care costs. In full, he told WKBT: “People decide to have families and become parents; that (cost) is something they need to consider when they make that choice. I’ve never really felt it was society’s responsibility to take care of other people’s children.”
Democratic U.S. Sen. Tammy Baldwin responded indirectly to Johnson on Twitter on Wednesday.
“As a Wisconsin Senator, I don’t believe it’s society’s responsibility to give huge tax breaks to millionaires, billionaires, and wealthy corporations,” Baldwin wrote. “They should pay their fair share of taxes so we can lower the cost of child care for working families.”
On Thursday, Johnson characterized child care aid as “the federal government wanting to take greater control over your children.”
“Does the federal government want to start indoctrinating our children even earlier?” he asked.
Johnson made opposition to federal debt and deficit spending a centerpiece of his 2010 and 2016 campaigns. In 2017, he voted for the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which added up to $2 trillion to the national debt, according to the Tax Policy Center. In 2020, he voted for the first federal COVID-19 relief bill, which added about $1.8 trillion to the national debt, according to the conservative Heritage Foundation.
Johnson concerned Biden will nominate ‘radical leftist’ to US Supreme Court
“My concern,” Johnson said, “is that President Biden has been nominating to his federal agencies some of the most radical leftists that I’ve certainly seen in my time in the Senate, and I’m afraid that’s what he’s going to do on the Supreme Court.”
Johnson did not elaborate on what acceptable nominees Biden could offer.
Johnson was first elected in 2010; he is running for reelection to a third term in November.
Editor’s note: WPR’s Diane Bezucha contributed reporting to this story.
Listen to the WPR link here.
US Sen. Ron Johnson defends saying taking care of children isn’t ‘society’s responsibility’ was originally published by Wisconsin Public Radio.
Although it’s societies burden to subsidize the lazy Rich and corporations.
Legislators don’t want to provide a safety net for children. They also don’t want to offer sex education for adolescents. Nor do they want to give women the right to control their own bodies when dealing with pregnancy. This just doesn’t make sense.