Republicans Vote Against Medicaid Transgender Care
Legislative committee vote keeps Wisconsin out of compliance with a court non-discrimination order.
Republicans voted to block a change that would have brought state law into compliance with Medicaid rules, a court ruling and other laws that ban discrimination on gender-transition care.
The Department of Health Services (DHS) sought a rule change in state law, approved in June by Gov. Tony Evers, affirming that transgender individuals who participate in Medicaid can receive necessary medication, surgeries and hormone therapies. While the federal rules mean Wisconsinites seeking such care will be covered, the GOP vote means the Wisconsin statute is non-compliant with a federal court order prohibiting such discrimination.
Given that the court ordered a permanent ban on enforcement, the only current, practical impact of the vote, conducted by paper ballot Thursday in the Legislature’s Joint Review of Administrative Rules (JCRAR) committee, was to make a statement alienating transgender Wisconsinites, particularly those on Medicaid who may need hormone therapy or necessary gender-affirming surgery.
“That legislative Republicans would seek to deny them this care — even if it means violating a federal injunction — shows not just a lack of moral character but a lack of understanding of how our country works,” said JCRAR member Sen. Chris Larson (D-Milwaukee) in a statement after the vote.
Larson said the vote showed “contempt” for the LGBTQ Wisconsinites, who Republicans have also alienated through proposed athletic participation bans by gender and by voting against outlawing “conversion therapy” that seeks to change the sexual orientation or gender identity of minors.
He added that this sends, “a signal to our transgender neighbors that some elected officials do not value them as full and equal members of our society. Combined with the GOP-sponsored bills currently being debated that seek to ban transgender youth from participating in sports as a member of their identified gender, it becomes even clearer where Republicans stand when it comes to human rights.”
In requesting the rule change, the DHS agency report stated, “There are no reasonable alternatives to the proposed repeal, and these exclusions must be repealed in order to ensure that the department complies with the district court’s permanent injunction, and to ensure consistency between department policy and its rule so that the public is aware that Medicaid coverage is available for the currently-excluded services.”
DHS spokesperson Jennifer Miller confirms that the agency abides by the 2019 ruling determining exclusions from coverage for “gender-affirming procedures, including surgeries, hormone therapy and surgical alterations” are unconstitutional and permanently enjoined and, therefore, “at this time, the JCRAR ruling has no effect on Medicaid coverage for these procedures.”
The rule change had been in the works for two years, and was approved by Gov. Evers on June 10. Some of the other procedures excluded from coverage under the Wisconsin Medicaid statutes include surrogate parenting, artificial insemination, ear lobe repair, female circumcision and tattoo removal.
The majority of public and private insurance plans have removed exclusions that blatantly target transgender people, according to the National Center for Transgender Equality, but the group states that many plans continue to deny coverage for medically necessary care.
Christy Mallory, the UCLA Williams School of Law’s legal director, authored a study estimating that 152,000 transgender adults are enrolled in Medicaid out of a total of 1.4 million adults in the U.S. who identify as transgender. The study also estimated that “32,000 transgender Medicaid beneficiaries live in states with express bans that deny access to covered gender-affirming care.”
The Wisconsin class action lawsuit against the Medicaid care exclusion on “transsexual surgery” and “drugs, including hormone therapy, associated with transsexual surgery or medically unnecessary alteration of sexual anatomy or characteristics” began with four plaintiffs who were awarded $840,000 in damages and $1.35 million in legal fees in Dec. 2019.
In his ruling, U.S. District Judge William Conley said that the “consensus within the medical profession (is) that gender dysphoria is a serious medical condition, which if left untreated or inadequately treated can cause adverse symptoms, such as anxiety, depression, serious mental distress, self-harm, and suicidal ideation.”
For information on finding Wisconsin health care providers that are transgender, genderqueer, nonbinary and gender nonconforming friendly the Wisconsin Transgender Health Coalition maintains a directory.
Republicans vote against Medicaid for transgender patient care was originally published by the Wisconsin Examiner.
In some ways, this will seem like a marginal action affecting a small group of people. But it is part of a larger picture. In our country, and in an “otherized” Wisconsin, the genie of cruelty is now out of the bottle. And, once out, to mix a metaphor, it is always necessary to feed the beast. That means going after a rotating cast of scapegoats among the most vulnerable groups.
Years ago, Jerry Falwell, the famous Christian, along with his group of money-driven bigots, decided that they had milked racial animus to the limit, at least for the time being. Jesus’ message of peace, love, justice and inclusion long forgotten, they made a conscious decision to go after gay people.
Now, with the platforms of Fox News and social media, the spawn of Falwell, housed mostly in the Republican Party, continue the pattern of trying to make the lives of the most vulnerable people as miserable as possible. These groups, “the others,” include immigrants from ****hole countries and lgbtq people, along with the eternal favorites, Black people. And, anti-Semitism always lurking just beneath the surface.
It is no accident that these groups, along with, most notably, women and people with disabilities, are the ones who were excluded from full participation in American life for much of our history. And that the Republican Party is now the vehicle for seeking to “put them back in their place.” In this respect, cruelty is no longer an ancillary effect. It is the purpose of the action. And, in a nation with notoriously short attention spans, feeding the beast means constantly updating the forms of cruelty being used to make the lives of “the others” miserable. This is just a small example.
I am wondering if much of what we are experiencing in our society with regards to gender is possibly related to the enormous increase in our exposure to endocrine disrupting chemicals in our environment. Here is a one-page, easy-to-read report by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, a world leader in its field.
“Endocrine Disruptors”, NIEHS/National Institutes of Health/U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
https://www.niehs.nih.gov/health/topics/agents/endocrine/index.cfm
I would like to know more about this.
Nazi Republicans strike again.