WILL Judge Shops To Kill Mask Mandate
Conservative group files suit in Polk County, where both judges were appointed by Scott Walker.
Thankfully, the 43,598 residents of Polk County in northwest Wisconsin have not been hit hard by the COVID-19 pandemic.
As of last Thursday, there had been 73,138 positive COVID-19 tests across Wisconsin, and only 167 of them in Polk County. Of the 1,111 pandemic deaths statewide, two were in Polk County. The virus incident rate per 100,000 residents was 385 in Polk County — less than one-third of the statewide average of 1,265.
Yet, when the conservative Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty (WILL) sued to overturn two public health emergency declarations issued by Democratic Gov. Tony Evers, where did it file that lawsuit?
It’s the latest example of judge shopping, which is allowed because Republican legislators and GOP Gov. Scott Walker elected in 2010 rewrote state law to allow state government to be sued in any county. Republicans felt that judges in Dane County — seat of state government — were too predictably liberal.
Judge shopping occurs when an individual or organization sues in a county where plaintiffs think judges may be more likely to agree with the claims in their lawsuit. Both of Polk County’s Circuit Court judges – Jeff Anderson and Daniel Tolan — were appointed by Walker.
Polk County is also part of the 3rd District Court of Appeals, which would hear any appeal of a decision by Anderson or Tolan. Two of the three 3rd District Court of Appeals judges — Chief Judge Lisa Stark and Judge Thomas Hruz — were also appointed by Walker. Stark won a full term in 2013; Hruz won a full term in 2016. The third judge in that district, Mark Seidel, was elected in 2015.
No one knows how Polk County and 3rd District Court of Appeals judges will rule on the WILL lawsuit. But WILL thinks its odds of winning are higher in Polk County than they would be in Dane or Milwaukee counties.
An Ozaukee County judge agreed, ordered the names of those voters purged and held Elections Commission members in contempt. The appeal of those orders are pending before the state Supreme Court, where conservatives have a 4-3 majority.
But back to WILL’s lawsuit in Polk County, where — the suit admits — COVID-19 “has not greatly impacted” that county.
The suit alleges that Evers illegally declared two back-to-back public health emergencies in March and July. The July order included the statewide “Mask Up Wisconsin” edict to fight the spread of COVID-19.
Yet, insisted Rick Esenberg, WILL’s president and founder, “This lawsuit is not about whether masks are good or bad, or whether Wisconsin ought to do more, or less, to address COVID-19.”
“It isn’t even about whether the state should have a mask mandate,” Esenberg added. “This lawsuit is about our system of government and the rule of law. Gov. Evers cannot seize these time-limited emergency powers more than once without legislative approval.”
Still, the second page of the lawsuit makes it clear that repealing the mask order is a primary goal of the lawsuit.
Evers “unlawfully” extended the state of emergency for a second 60 days for the same reason – the COVID-19 pandemic – “without approval by the Legislature,” according to the lawsuit.
Let’s, as Evers often says, connect some dots. After Evers issued the “mask up” order, Senate Majority Leader Scott Fitzgerald wanted both houses of the Republican-controlled Legislature to convene and overturn that order. But Assembly Speaker Robin Vos refused to bring Assembly Republicans back to the Capitol to cast that vote. Why? Maybe because the last Marquette University poll found that 69 percent of respondents statewide supported wearing face masks to fight the pandemic.
Hopefully, Vos added, “citizens groups” would fight the statewide mask edict. WILL just did.
Steven Walters is a senior producer for the nonprofit public affairs channel WisconsinEye. Contact him at stevenscotwalters@gmail.com
If you think stories like this are important, become a member of Urban Milwaukee and help support real, independent journalism. Plus you get some cool added benefits.
More about the Coronavirus Pandemic
- Governors Tony Evers, JB Pritzker, Tim Walz, and Gretchen Whitmer Issue a Joint Statement Concerning Reports that Donald Trump Gave Russian Dictator Putin American COVID-19 Supplies - Gov. Tony Evers - Oct 11th, 2024
- MHD Release: Milwaukee Health Department Launches COVID-19 Wastewater Testing Dashboard - City of Milwaukee Health Department - Jan 23rd, 2024
- Milwaukee County Announces New Policies Related to COVID-19 Pandemic - County Executive David Crowley - May 9th, 2023
- DHS Details End of Emergency COVID-19 Response - Wisconsin Department of Health Services - Apr 26th, 2023
- Milwaukee Health Department Announces Upcoming Changes to COVID-19 Services - City of Milwaukee Health Department - Mar 17th, 2023
- Fitzgerald Applauds Passage of COVID-19 Origin Act - U.S. Rep. Scott Fitzgerald - Mar 10th, 2023
- DHS Expands Free COVID-19 Testing Program - Wisconsin Department of Health Services - Feb 10th, 2023
- MKE County: COVID-19 Hospitalizations Rising - Graham Kilmer - Jan 16th, 2023
- Not Enough Getting Bivalent Booster Shots, State Health Officials Warn - Gaby Vinick - Dec 26th, 2022
- Nearly All Wisconsinites Age 6 Months and Older Now Eligible for Updated COVID-19 Vaccine - Wisconsin Department of Health Services - Dec 15th, 2022
Read more about Coronavirus Pandemic here
More about the Statewide Mask Mandate
- Court Watch: Why Court Voided Evers Emergency Order - Gretchen Schuldt - Apr 5th, 2021
- Statement by Heartland Institute Director Jeré Fabick on WI Supreme Court Victory Against Gov. Tony Evers - Heartland Institute - Mar 31st, 2021
- Senator Agard: Statement on Supreme Court Decision - State Sen. Melissa Agard, Senate Democratic Leader - Mar 31st, 2021
- Wisconsin’s Hyperpartisan Supreme Court is Endangering the Public - Democratic Party of Wisconsin - Mar 31st, 2021
- Wisconsin Supreme Court: Gov. Evers’ Multiple Emergency Declarations Violate Law - Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty - Mar 31st, 2021
- Rep. Hesselbein Statement on Supreme Court Ruling on Emergency Orders - Dianne Hesselbein - Mar 31st, 2021
- Statement on Wisconsin Supreme Court Decision - State Sen. Jon Erpenbach - Mar 31st, 2021
- Gov. Evers Releases Statement Regarding Supreme Court Decision - Gov. Tony Evers - Mar 31st, 2021
- Rep. Hintz: Statement on Wisconsin Supreme Court Ruling - State Rep. Gordon Hintz - Mar 31st, 2021
- State Supreme Court Overrules Evers’ Emergency Powers - Laurel White - Mar 31st, 2021
Read more about Statewide Mask Mandate here
The State of Politics
-
RNC Brings Fame to Gen Z Party Leader
Jul 15th, 2024 by Steven Walters -
Wisconsin’s Republican Roots Run Deep
Jul 8th, 2024 by Steven Walters -
Feuding Supreme Court Justices Need a Break
Jul 1st, 2024 by Steven Walters
Why is WILL working to eliminate a State Order that will save lives, limit the spread of the pandemic, and get out economy going again? This firm has no morals or commitment to the common good. This lawsuit is meant to create more chaos in the State and generate some publicity for WILL.
Yet another legacy of the 2010 election when too many people didn’t vote. The perfect storm of apathy and resurgent republican extremism – resulting in the 2010 winners being in charge of the reapportionment and laws like the one cited in the article. GOTV!