Erik Gunn

Brostoff Slams Occupational Licensing Legislation

The Milwaukee representative assails legislation, says it could have a hazardous outcome.

By , Wisconsin Examiner - Jan 31st, 2020 03:55 pm
Jonathan Brostoff. Photo from the State of Wisconsin Blue Book 2017-18.

Jonathan Brostoff. Photo from the State of Wisconsin Blue Book 2017-18.

Three weeks ago, Assembly lawmakers were debating whether the state should move more cautiously before imposing new licensing requirements for certain jobs.

On Thursday, the same bill passed out of committee with a major rewrite that would appear to all but block new occupational licenses altogether.

The Assembly Committee on Regulatory and Licensing Reform advanced AB-605 to the full Assembly, with all Republicans voting in favor and all Democrats opposed.

In its original form, the measure would have required that any proposals to require new licenses for occupations would be subject to a so-called ‘sunrise report.’ That means evaluations, first, on whether licensing for the occupation was necessary to protect the public, and, second, on the relative costs and benefits of requiring the license.

State occupational licensing requirements have been targeted in recent years by several free-market and libertarian organizations, who contend they wind up killing jobs needlessly. Critics from hair stylists to skilled construction trades workers have questioned whether the campaign against occupational licensing is intended to undercut professional wages while disregarding consumer safety.

Even in its original form the proposal sparked skepticism from critics on the committee, chief among them Rep. Jonathan Brostoff (D-Milwaukee), who suggested that ignoring licensing proposals would risk subjecting consumers to preventable hazards.

At the bill’s Jan. 8 public hearing, State Sen. Chris Kapenga (R- Delafield), a cosponsor, mentioned plans to amend it to assign the job of evaluating licensing proposals to the Legislative Audit Bureau instead of the Department of Safety and Professional Services.

But the amendment from State Rep. Rob Hutton (R-Brookfield) that dropped on Monday had another, much bigger change: It sets a 270-day window for the bureau to conduct its investigation, and forbids lawmakers from holding a hearing or a vote on the proposal before that process is complete.

“This could result in licensing bills introduced partway through a legislative session timing out should the session adjourn before a ‘sunrise report’ is completed,” Brostoff said in a statement hours after Thursday’s vote. “The amendment keeps most of the worst parts of the original bill, and then cedes even more control over the legislative process for licensing bills to unelected bureaucrats.” The result, he warned, could undermine occupational licensing procedures in the state.

“The bill as originally drafted was an absolute mess,” Brostoff stated. The amendment “somehow makes the bill even worse.”

The Wisconsin Examiner sought comment from Hutton and Kapenga, authors of the Assembly and Senate versions of the bill respectively. Neither lawmaker had contacted the Examiner by late Friday evening in response.

Reprinted with permission of Wisconsin Examiner.

Related Legislation: 2019-2020 Assembly Bill 605

Leave a Reply

You must be an Urban Milwaukee member to leave a comment. Membership, which includes a host of perks, including an ad-free website, tickets to marquee events like Summerfest, the Wisconsin State Fair and the Florentine Opera, a better photo browser and access to members-only, behind-the-scenes tours, starts at $9/month. Learn more.

Join now and cancel anytime.

If you are an existing member, sign-in to leave a comment.

Have questions? Need to report an error? Contact Us