5 Reasons for Republican Power Play
One key reason: they see Tony Evers as weak.
There are many explanations for last week’s power play by Republicans that trampled Democratic lawmakers and took power away from Democratic Governor-Elect Tony Evers and Democratic Attorney General-Elect Josh Kaul.
Five of them:
First, Republican legislators knew they could act with impunity, having increased their majority in the Senate and kept 63 seats in the 99-member Assembly after a tough campaign season.
Before the November 6 election, incumbent Republican legislators worried about running in the shadow of an unpopular President and voters’ concerns about health care, funding K-12 schools and bad roads. Republicans also worried that polls gave Democratic U.S. Sen. Tammy Baldwin insurmountable leads over her Republican challenger, State Sen. Leah Vukmir, in the top-of-the-ticket race. And, when there were signs that more than 500,000 residents – or about one in five – were voting early, Republicans got more nervous.
Instead, voters narrowly ousted two-term Republican Gov. Scott Walker and GOP Attorney General Brad Schimel. Democrats also won two other statewide offices. But no incumbent Republican legislator lost, which Democrats insisted proved how effectively Republicans had gerrymandered the state in their favor in 2011.
Consider this: If you’re a Madison Democrat and mad as hell at the GOP’s power grab, is there any way you can punish a Republican legislator for last week’s power grab? No. Why? The only names on your Madison ballot will be unopposed Democrats in November 2020.
That’s because November 2020 will be the last time Republican legislators run in districts they drew in 2011 – districts that have been very, very good to them. More certain than ever that they will get re-elected in 2020, Republican leaders secretly drafted their package of bills to give the legislative branch more authority at the expense of Evers and Kaul.
After all, Republicans reasoned, Evers won largely because voters in two counties – Dane and Milwaukee – favored him over Walker by a stunning margin of 288,915 votes.
In an election for governor that drew a record 2.6 million votes, the Evers winning margin of only 29,227 votes was “no mandate,” Assembly Speaker Robin Vos told his caucus when they met to re-elect him speaker.
Vos is expected to run for governor in 2022.
Third, GOP leaders like Vos and Senate Majority Leader Scott Fitzgerald have never considered Evers their political equal in take-no-prisoners Capitol wars. So, they thought he would struggle to offer a quick response to their rewrite of the rules of governing.
After all, Evers had a “Tony too nice” reputation. He served as state superintendent of public instruction since 2009 and, before that, was a school district administrator. Evers didn’t become a Capitol power player until he won the August primary to challenge Walker.
Fourth, Republican legislators were willing to take their chances in lawsuits expected over how GOP’s rebalancing of power between the executive and legislative branches of state government.
“There’s going to be litigation,” Kaul warned.
But state law defines the duties of the attorney general, so changes on that could be upheld. The strongest legal claim may be that the Republicans’ changes illegally infringed on the governor’s inherent powers.
Fifth, Republican legislators say, the changes they rammed through the Legislature in a two-day blitz didn’t include some of the most radical steps they had considered. That not-so-subtle message is: “It could have been worse.”
For example, Republicans dropped the plan to move the 2020 Presidential primary from April to March – a move that Fitzgerald bluntly admitted could have helped reelect conservative Supreme Court Justice Daniel Kelly. Republicans felt Kelly, a Walker appointee to the court, had a better chance of winning re-election in a low-turnout April election in which voters were not picking presidential favorites.
Republicans also considered, but rejected, trying to limit the governor’s broad veto powers.
Republicans also did not attempt to change how new legislative district lines will be drawn after the 2020 Census. Those lines are drawn in a bill that must be approved by the governor.
One rumor: Republicans researched whether new districts could be drawn through a joint resolution the Republican-controlled Legislature would pass – a process that would bypass Evers.
That was why, when Republicans finally made public their list of changes, they quickly added: “We didn’t touch redistricting.”
Steven Walters is a senior producer for the nonprofit public affairs channel WisconsinEye. Contact him at stevenscotwalters@gmail.com
More about the Lame Duck Laws
- Four Years Later, State’s Lame Duck Law Still Faces Court Challenge - Shawn Johnson - Jan 17th, 2023
- Judge Rules Against Law Giving Legislators Power Over Attorney General Settlements - Shawn Johnson - May 11th, 2022
- State Supreme Court Dismisses AG’s Lame-Duck Lawsuit - Ruth Conniff - Mar 25th, 2021
- Kaul Sues Legislature Over Lame Duck Laws - Melanie Conklin - Nov 24th, 2020
- AG Kaul Announces Legal Action to Allow DOJ to Again Enforce Wisconsin Laws Without Unconstitutional Legislative Interference - Josh Kaul - Nov 23rd, 2020
- Vos Thinks Lame-Duck Session Didn’t Go Far Enough - Melanie Conklin - Jul 31st, 2020
- The State of Politics: Court Rulings Against Evers Sow Confusion - Steven Walters - Jul 20th, 2020
- Court Tosses Dems’ Lame-Duck Suit - Laurel White - Jul 16th, 2020
- Op Ed: State High Court Nullifies 2018 Election - James Rowen - Jul 12th, 2020
- WI Supreme Court Upholds GOP Lame-Duck Laws - Laurel White - Jul 9th, 2020
Read more about Lame Duck Laws here
The State of Politics
-
RNC Brings Fame to Gen Z Party Leader
Jul 15th, 2024 by Steven Walters -
Wisconsin’s Republican Roots Run Deep
Jul 8th, 2024 by Steven Walters -
Feuding Supreme Court Justices Need a Break
Jul 1st, 2024 by Steven Walters
So Steve, are you saying that the legislature will seek to draw the new district lines without any input or veto possibility from the Governor? And that’s thought to be legal/constitutional?
Also, one of the most specious of their acts is the limit on voting! If they want small towns, rural areas, and villages to be equal with large cities like Milwaukee and Madison, why not allow them to set early voting when they want? It doesn’t make any sense to limit voting times. In fact, why shouldn’t one be able to vote once nomination papers are “certified” and ballots printed? And by the way, the US Congress if it chose, could at least do this for their own elections under Article 1 Section 4 of the Constitution they have the right to determine “Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives”. A Democratic controlled house could propose a national standard, I think?
Elected officials at every level should take office the day after elections are certified.