Taxes Down, But No Impact on Jobs
State has dropped its ranking for taxes and fees, yet trails other states in new jobs.
Wisconsin’s ranking among the states in many measures of government revenue and spending has dropped considerably since about 2000, but that hasn’t translated into an increased pace of job creation, new figures from the U.S. Census Bureau show. In fact, Wisconsin continues to trail the national average in job growth.
As we reported previously, the latest data shows Wisconsin state and local governments ranked 25th among the states in the amount of taxes, fees, and other charges they collect from state residents when measured on a per-person basis. This downward trend in Wisconsin’s tax and fee ranking didn’t start with Gov. Scott Walker’s administration, but his focus on cutting taxes has contributed to Wisconsin’s continued drop.
Walker has argued that cutting taxes will improve the state’s economy, thereby allowing businesses to hire more people, but the state continues to lag well behind the national average in the pace of job growth. Wisconsin ranked 31st among the states in private sector job growth for the period for which the most reliable set of data is available, trailing behind the Midwest states of Minnesota, Michigan, Missouri, and Indiana. Tax cuts have been one component of Governor Walker’s efforts to make sure that Wisconsin is “open for business,” but if Walker has had any success in improving the state’s business climate, it hasn’t translated to improving job growth in the state.
The tax rankings show a decline in some measures of tax and fees paid by Wisconsin residents, but what they don’t show is which state residents are paying taxes or receiving the tax cuts. A Wisconsin Budget Project analysis showed that a disproportionately large share of the tax cuts passed in Wisconsin since 2011 have gone to the rich. Middle-class residents received less than the wealthy, and residents with low incomes received the smallest tax cut. That pattern holds true even when the tax cuts are measured as a share of income, an approach that takes into account relative income size. (Read more at Missing Out: Recent Tax Cuts Slanted in Favor of those with Highest Incomes, June 2017.)
For the complete picture on how Wisconsin compares to other states in various measures of taxes, revenue, and spending, read our new analysis: Middle of the Pack: Wisconsin Government Revenue is Similar to that in Other States.
Wisconsin Budget
-
Charting The Racial Disparities In State’s Prisons
Nov 28th, 2021 by Tamarine Cornelius -
State’s $1 Billion Tax Cut Leaves Out 49% of Taxpayers
Sep 21st, 2021 by Tamarine Cornelius -
TANF Program Serves a Fraction of Poor Families
Aug 30th, 2021 by Jon Peacock
When are we going to finally realize that Trickle Down Economics is a failed theory. As a nation, we’ve fallen into the old Calvinist idea that your riches on this earth is God showing his favor for you. Social Darwinism is a weapon in the quiver of class warfare. Since almost all of us think, we’re middle class, it is convenient to think that someday we’ll all be rich and we will enjoy the special status and benefits of being rich, like lower taxes and other blessings of God. This country was a better place for most people when we had a progressive tax system that rewarded those who were fortunate to accrue more wealth and recognized the contributions of those who worked equally hard to produce the products and services that created that wealth. When Milton Friedman and the mythology of Anne Rand created the apostles Kemp, Stockman, Ryan and their camp followers, we slowly, bought this load of horse pucky that giving more money to the rich, by reducing their tax burden was a way to create more jobs. This economic theory is swamp land in Florida, brothers and sister. This snake oil cures no ill’s.
Taxes are low in Alabama too.
@ Jeff Jordan
“when we had a progressive tax system that rewarded those who were fortunate to accrue more wealth and recognized the contributions of those who worked equally hard to produce the products and services that created that wealth.”
“bought this load of horse pucky that giving more money to the rich, by reducing their tax burden was a way to create more jobs. This economic theory is swamp land in Florida, brothers and sister.”
Amen brother! Could not have said it better myself.
Jeffe, the federal tax code in its current form s one of the most progressive in the world. The top 2 percent pay 50% of all federal income taxes. The top 20 percent pay 80% of all federal income taxes. The bottom 20 percent pay no taxes and in many cases get welfare for not paying federal taxes. How is that not progressive?