Thanks a lot, Ron Johnson: Supreme Court Issues First 4-4 Tie Since Passing of Justice Scalia
Sen. Johnson has expressed zero concern for this kind of scenario.
MADISON – What all reasonable Americans feared would happen as a result of Sen. Ron Johnson‘s Supreme Court obstruction finally came to fruition yesterday afternoon, as the United States Supreme Court issued its first 4-4 deadlock since Justice Scalia’s passing.
Yesterday, the Supreme Court issued a 4-4 ruling in Hawkins v. Community Bank of Raymore, where the court couldn’t come to a decision of their own on whether or not the bank discriminated against two wives who were held financially responsible for the failure of their husbands’ real estate endeavor.
Sen. Johnson has expressed zero concern for this kind of scenario, claiming, “If the court is deadlocked, there’s nothing guaranteed about a 4-4 split on a particular issue, then the ruling of the lower court stands.”  Yesterday’s outcome leaves in place a lower court ruling that the bank did not discriminate against the two women, and also means the Supreme Court failed to resolve a pair of conflicting lower court rulings on the question.
Instead of worrying about the very real possibility of a deadlocked court, Sen. Johnson is more concerned with a Democratic President nominating a replacement to the high court, saying that he is “concerned about changing the composition of the court to go 5-4 liberal.”  President Obama‘s nominee, Justice Merrick Garland, was supported by seven Republican Senators when confirmed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia in 1997.
Since the unfortunate passing of Justice Scalia, Sen. Ron Johnson has led the charge in obstructing any judicial nomination by President Barack Obama, even though the President has a constitutional responsibility to nominate a Supreme Court Justice and the Senate has a duty to vote on that nominee.
Throughout our country’s history, the Senate has repeatedly confirmed Justices to the Supreme Court in the final year of a president’s term – including times when the Presidency and the Senate were controlled by different parties. At least 14 Justices have been confirmed during a presidential election year.
Sen. Johnson’s unnecessary obstruction weakens the Supreme Court and compromises a fundamental part of American democracy.
“If Sen. Ron Johnson won’t do his job and vote on the President’s nominee for the United States Supreme Court, then we will see more gridlock like this on the nation’s high court,” Democratic Party of Wisconsin Executive Director Kory Kozloski said on Wednesday. “Unless Sen. Johnson’s goal is to make the Supreme Court as dysfunctional as the Republican-controlled Congress, he should do the job Wisconsinites elected him to do.”
Johnson Was Not Concerned About The Possibility Of The Supreme Court Being Deadlocked For Over A Year Because The Lower Court Ruling Would Stand. Johnson spoke about the possibility of tied votes on the Supreme Court until a new president took office: “If the court is deadlocked, there’s nothing guaranteed about a 4-4 split on a particular issue, then the ruling of the lower court stands. So again, rather than have a lame duck president decide or, quite honestly, a lame duck Republican Senate decide, let’s let the American people decide the direction of the Supreme Court.” [WBAY, Action 10 News, 2/21/16]
Johnson Was More Concerned About The Possibility Of A Liberal Majority On The Supreme Court Than About The Prospect Of The Court Being Deadlocked For Months. JOHNSON: “There’s not going to be damage to the republic if we don’t fill that seat for a few extra months. The Supreme Court takes a very few cases. You know, even if the court is deadlocked 4-4, the case is still going to be decided, whatever the appellate judge, appellate court ruled. Some of the current ones, I agree with the appellate court ruling, some I don’t. That would be the end result, and they could always be reconsidered the next year. It’s not like the Supreme Court rules on every case, it rules on a very limited amount. So again, I don’t see the imperative of, ‘We’ve just got to replace this individual.’ I’m more concerned myself, and I’m sure we don’t agree on this, I’m concerned about changing the composition of the court to go 5-4 liberal, because I think that does create an awful lot of problems in terms of freedom of speech-” [WCCO, John Williams, 2/16/16]
Mentioned in This Press Release
Recent Press Releases by Democratic Party of Wisconsin - Page 3
"Stop playing partisan politics and put Wisconsin first, for once."
AP broke the news that Lieutenant Governor Rebecca Kleefisch has decided not to enter the GOP primary for U.S. Senate.
Strong Candidates and Grassroots Enthusiasm Intimidate Justice Michael Gableman from Seeking a Second Term
Will Gov. Scott Walker Stand Up For Vulnerable Wisconsinites At Risk Of Losing Health Care Insurance?Jun 13th, 2017 by Democratic Party of Wisconsin
It's been widely reported that Senate Republicans are drafting their version of Trumpcare behind closed doors.
"And my concern, Martha, is what the hell are we investigating?"
Mayor Tom Barrett and Chair Martha Laning Slam Disastrous Trumpcare Bill, Call For Strengthening ACAJun 10th, 2017 by Democratic Party of Wisconsin
If Trumpcare becomes the law of the land, it is estimated that 311,000 Wisconsin residents will lose their health care coverage.
"Shockingly, the President does not seem to prioritize the integrity of our democracy."
Sen. Leah Vukmir and Rep. Dale Kooyenga Fail To Get The Job Done
Democratic Party of Wisconsin Statement on the President’s Decision to Withdraw From The Paris AgreementJun 2nd, 2017 by Democratic Party of Wisconsin
"Anyone who cares about the future of our planet and the future of our economy should remember his action this week and plan to vote him out of office..."
The CBO found the premiums could rise as much as 700 percent for low-income seniors.
According to a report released by the CBO and JCT, Wisconsin Republicans voted to raise premiums on their own constituents to the tune of a twenty percent hike starting just next year.
Democratic Party of Wisconsin Statement on AG Brad Schimel Request To Supreme Court For A Stay In Redistricting Lawsuit RulingMay 22nd, 2017 by Democratic Party of Wisconsin
"Schimel should end his tremendous waste of taxpayer resources and urge the legislature to create new lines as requested by the highest court in the land..."