Compact Implementation Coalition
Press Release

Groups React to Recommendation on Precedent-Setting Great Lakes Water Diversion Request

The Declaration of Findings include conditions added by the Great Lakes Governors and Premiers that will modify the diversion request.

By - May 18th, 2016 11:24 am

Today the Regional Body met and voted on the final Declaration of Findings on the City of Waukesha’s Lake Michigan diversion proposal. The Declaration of Findings include conditions added by the Great Lakes Governors and Premiers that will modify the diversion request. After today’s vote, the Declaration of Findings will be forwarded to the Compact Council for a final vote in June 2016. All states and provinces supported the Declaration, while Minnesota abstained to vote in order to consult further with stakeholders.

The Wisconsin Compact Implementation Coalition responds to today’s vote:

“We are pleased that the Regional Body agreed with us that Waukesha’s proposal as submitted does not meet the requirements of the Great Lakes Compact and is recommending modifications to its proposal. But we are disappointed that the Regional Body did not completely reject Waukesha’s flawed diversion proposal. We need to carefully examine the conditions that the Regional Body has recommended to determine if they uphold the letter and spirit of the Great Lakes Compact. When complete, we will forward our assessment to the jurisdictions and the Regional Compact Council, which is scheduled to meet on June 21 or 22.”

Waukesha, Wisconsin’s application to divert water from Lake Michigan is the first test of the Great Lakes Compact, a regional pact banning the diversion of Great Lakes water outside the basin, with limited exceptions.

Under the Great Lakes Compact, any diversion application must be approved by all eight Great Lakes states. The two Canadian provinces bordering the lakes, Ontario and Quebec, are allowed to provide input. Any state may veto the diversion application.

The Great Lakes-St. Lawrence River Water Resources Regional Body includes representatives from each of the jurisdictions, including the states and provinces. At the regional level, the Regional Body is the first step in the decision-making process of any diversion request and makes a recommendation to the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence River Water Resources Compact Council. The Compact Council, which consists of only the governors of the eight Great Lakes states, will meet on June 21/22 to review the Regional Body’s recommendation and make a final decision on Waukesha’s request.

Press Releases by Compact Implementation Coalition

Compact Implementation Coalition

Great Lakes Leaders Approve Waukesha Water Diversion

Wisconsin environmental groups' concerns remain; modified diversion plan will require vigilance

Compact Implementation Coalition

Groups Ask Wisconsin to Clarify its Authority to Regulate a Waukesha Diversion

An opinion by the Wisconsin Attorney General casts doubt on the state’s authority to manage, regulate, and enforce conditions the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence River Water Resources Compact Council may require when approving a diversion.

Compact Implementation Coalition

Groups React as States and Provinces Commit to Reconvene in May to Continue Debate on Precedent-Setting Great Lakes Water Diversion

It is critical that any diversion proposal meet the rigorous requirements of the Compact which were developed to safeguard the Great Lakes.

Compact Implementation Coalition

Public Overwhelmingly Opposed To Wisconsin’s Great Lakes Diversion Proposal

99% of more than 11,200 comments indicate opposition or serious concern regarding City of Waukesha's proposed Great Lakes diversion

Compact Implementation Coalition

New Information Confirms Great Lakes Water Unnecessary for Waukesha

Updated report reaffirms sustainable alternative to Great Lakes water

Compact Implementation Coalition

Waukesha water diversion application will set precedent for adherence to Great Lakes Compact

Eight Great Lakes governors and two Canadian premiers ask Great Lakes citizens to chime in

See More Releases

2 thoughts on “Groups React to Recommendation on Precedent-Setting Great Lakes Water Diversion Request”

  1. David says:

    Would Waukesha support the diversion if Milwaukee was the one without access to the Great Lakes?

  2. AG says:

    And thus Dave, you give us definitive proof that you oppose this plan simply because you’re part of the Milwaukee vs Waukesha division. You, people like you, and your counterparts in Waukesha County, need to get over yourselves. The metro has 1.7 million people and most of us can benefit if both areas learn how to work together.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *