Jeramey Jannene
Eyes on Milwaukee

Bay View Gateway Approved

But not before Zielinski introduced an amendment that some claim would have derailed project.

By - Jul 31st, 2017 09:38 pm
Sign-up for the Urban Milwaukee daily email
Rendering of proposed apartment building at 2130 S. Kinnickinnic Ave. Rendering by Korb + Associates Architects.

Rendering of proposed apartment building at 2130 S. Kinnickinnic Ave. Rendering by Korb + Associates Architects.

A large apartment building proposed for the north end of Milwaukee’s Bay View neighborhood has been approved. The project was unanimously approved by the full Common Council, but not before area alderman Tony Zielinski introduced an amendment that according to multiple council members could have derailed the whole project.

New Land Enterprises is planning to build a $25 million, mixed-use apartment building with just under 140 apartments at the southeast corner of E. Bay St. and N. Kinnickinnic Ave. The proposal, which requires council approval because it exceeds the zoning for the site at 2130 S. Kinnickinnic Ave., also would involve New Land purchasing a portion of the city-owned land at 353 E. Bay St.

Zielinsnki’s amendment would have dedicated proceeds from the $161,500 land sale associated with the project to creating a park in his aldermanic district. Ald. Robert Bauman was the first to weigh in on the amendment, noting “this is a very interesting and novel approach, which I’m not sure is legal.” The downtown alderman noted that while he was interested in dedicating the funds, he was concerned the funds legally had to go to the Redevelopment Authority of the City of Milwaukee.

Bauman noted that Zielinski’s introduction of the amendment on the council floor, instead of at committee, prevented the city attorney from rendering an opinion on it.

Ald. Jim Bohl seconded Bauman’s concerns noting “this might jeopardize the legality of the entire file with this being added.” Bohl also noted that the total proceeds wouldn’t be anywhere near enough to build a park.

Zielinski defended the measure, noting he believed the Legislative Reference Bureau had consulted with the City Attorney’s office on the matter and that in a worst case scenario the money could be given to the redevelopment authority. Yet a temporary hold on the amendment didn’t yield an answer from the attorney’s office.

At this point other council members began to come forward with concerns about the proposal. Ald. Nik Kovac questioned the dedication of funds solely to a more wealthy district like his or Zielinski’s versus spreading them equally across the city through initiatives like MKE Plays. Others raised concerns about not having a hearing on the measure.

The Bay View alderman ultimately pulled the amendment to allow the project to move forward following testimony from a number of council members. He noted that he would work through the normal legislative approval process to secure funding for the park.

Ashanti Hamilton, in a bit of editorial feedback from the council president’s seat, noted Zielinski’s move was “the prudent and responsible thing to do.”

As is standard operating procedure the land sale as approved today will dedicate 30 percent of the proceeds plus sale and marketing fees to the redevelopment authority. The remaining portion of the $161,500 sale price will be put into the general fund for next year’s budget.

For more on the proposed development, see past coverage by my colleague Graham Kilmer of the project’s zoning committee hearing and City Plan Commission hearing.

What Future Park?

Zielinski is seeking to convert all five acres of the former Army Reserve site bordered by S. Logan Ave., S. Bay St., E. Lincoln Ave. and E. Conway St. into a city park.

The city, with Zielinski’s support to issue a RFP at the time, had sought to develop the parcel in 2008, with a listing price of of $2.03 million. Zielinski ended up opposing the proposal selected the city.

Zielinski again advanced a proposal in 2015 to redevelop the site with environmentally-friendly homes. That proposal ultimately didn’t advance.

The proposal comes as Zielinski has doubled-down on a stance that all high-density development in the district should be on S. Kinnickinnic Ave. and other commercial areas while what he causes “residential areas” should be free of high-density residential buildings.

Renderings

If you think stories like this are important, become a member of Urban Milwaukee and help support real independent journalism. Plus you get some cool added benefits, all detailed here. 

More about the gateway

6 thoughts on “Eyes on Milwaukee: Bay View Gateway Approved”

  1. Toni Toni Toni says:

    YAY. This is great news for St Francis, Cudahy and other surrounding south side neighborhoods people of Bay View will be moving to…. To park their cars.

  2. Beer Baron says:

    Can we get a nice 10 story apartment/commercial on that chunk of land? I love parks, but Z-boys plan is frivolous. and he’s only doing it to try and halt a potential rail stop seeing as it’s adjacent to where the KRM study was done.

  3. Joe says:

    The proposal includes more parking spaces than there are units in the building. Why do people continue to complain about parking?

    Bay View is a very walkable neighborhood and has easy access to downtown via the 15 and 48 buses. Ditch your car if this building makes parking so difficult for you (it wont).

  4. Rob says:

    I love the idea of turning the old Army Reserve base into a park!

  5. Paul M. says:

    People are so ridiculous about the parking; they sound like broken records. There’s no shortage of parking as it is, and the development will include a lot of spots. Heaven forbid you have to walk a block or two to store your private vehicle on a public street in a dense, walkable, desirable area. Do people not realize that part of what makes the neighborhood appealing in the first place is that it’s not as auto-centric as, say, S 27th St?

  6. Sharon Shell says:

    Well Rob, so much for your park. Don’t you think Alderman Tony Zielinski would have researched his idea of a Bay View Recreation Park before talking about it publicly? Or was it a little incentive for those on the fence regarding the Hamburger Mary’s location Development? Or……..was it premeditated (as a silver lining) to prevent many of those against selling a green space for a parking lot from opposing the project?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *