DNR Says Wisconsin Could Meet New Rule To Replace All Lead Pipes in 10 Years
But new rule, touted by President Biden in visit Tuesday, will require Milwaukee receive substantially more funding.
President Joe Biden visited Milwaukee on Tuesday to announce a new rule from the Environmental Protection Agency that will require all lead water lines nationwide to be replaced within a decade.
The president said that more than 367,000 lead pipes have been removed nationwide since he took office.
Biden also revealed that the EPA will make an additional $2.6 billion available to fund drinking water upgrades and pipe replacement projects to meet this 10-year deadline. Wisconsin is set to receive nearly $43 million of this additional funding, according to a release from the EPA.
Milwaukee officials have stated that the city will be able to replace more than 70,000 lead service pipes in compliance with the new EPA rule. But the DNR’s Bureau of Drinking Water and Groundwater Director Steve Elmore told WPR’s “Wisconsin Today” that, while the state is on track to meet this new rule, the federal government’s new funding won’t meet Milwaukee’s needs.
“It will clearly not be enough money,” Elmore said. “Milwaukee will need additional funding, either from the federal government, state government or from local sources to complete this replacement in a 10-year period.”
Elmore said funding often goes to help coordinate how lead pipes are removed.
“Communities need help contracting with the staff that will actually replace the pipes — these aren’t city employees,” Elmore said. “They also need help with outreach and education in the community. There’s a lot of coordination and work with individual homeowners and coordinating with other city departments, like street departments. When you tear up the street to replace a lead service line, there’s a lot to consider.”
Elmore said misconceptions about lead line replacements can pose challenges to getting these aging pipes out of homes and communities.
“There are certain individuals … that aren’t enthusiastic about replacing their lead service line because that may involve disruptions to their landscaping or they may perceive that it will be an inconvenience. Maybe that their water might be off for a while,” Elmore said. “Those are all (misconceptions) the utilities are ready to address and to work with them on that.
Activist says not enough education on dangers of lead in drinking water
Robert Miranda is a co-founder of the Get the Lead Out Coalition, an organization that’s lobbied Milwaukee for years to speed up its removal of lead service lines. He said cities like Milwaukee need to improve public education on the risks of lead in water.
“If the public understood how lead can impact the health of families much better, I think we would see a lot more cooperation in our communities from homeowners to remove these lead service lines,” Miranda said.
Miranda argued that service lines aren’t the only pipes residents need to consider. He said lead plumbing that’s within the house itself can pose health risks and needs to be replaced.
“I think that property owners are lacking the kind of incentives that would move them to do that,” Miranda said. “Tax abatements, some kind of low-interest-rate loan programs. A lot more of this has to be put out there for homeowners to see that there are options for them to engage in removing lead plumbing.”
Ultimately, Miranda said city and community leaders need to invite advocacy organizations to become partners in educating the public and getting the word out on replacing lead lines.
“They are the ones that are in the trenches and who are speaking to families and can come up and support whatever the city is trying to do to resolve this matter,” Miranda said. “They have the information. They have the streets … they talk to families. They need to be at the table.”
Wisconsin could meet new EPA lead pipe rule within 10 years with adequate funding, according to DNR official was originally published by Wisconsin Public Radio.
If you think stories like this are important, become a member of Urban Milwaukee and help support real, independent journalism. Plus you get some cool added benefits.
More about the Lead Crisis
- Superintendent Jill Underly Proposes Lead Water Removal Program For Schools - Baylor Spears - Nov 15th, 2024
- Milwaukee Adopts New Policy Requesting More Lead Testing For Children - Nick Rommel - Oct 24th, 2024
- EPA Strengthens Standards to Protect Children from Exposure to Lead Paint Dust - U.S. Environmental Protection Agency - Oct 24th, 2024
- Baldwin Announces $86 Million for Clean and Safe Drinking Water in Wisconsin Through Bipartisan Infrastructure Law - U.S. Sen. Tammy Baldwin - Oct 23rd, 2024
- DHS Encourages Wisconsinites to Take Action to Prevent Childhood Lead Poisoning - Wisconsin Department of Health Services - Oct 21st, 2024
- DNR Says Wisconsin Could Meet New Rule To Replace All Lead Pipes in 10 Years - Trevor Hook - Oct 12th, 2024
- Biden Announces New Funds, Deadline For Lead Pipe Replacement - Sophie Bolich - Oct 8th, 2024
- Biden-Harris Administration Issues Final Rule Requiring Replacement of Lead Pipes Within 10 Years, Announces Funding to Provide Clean Water to Schools and Homes - U.S. Environmental Protection Agency - Oct 8th, 2024
- City Hall: Ahead of Biden Visit, Council, DPW Officials Question Efficacy of Replacing Lead Pipes - Jeramey Jannene - Oct 7th, 2024
- Baldwin Delivers Nearly $13 Million for Milwaukee and Kenosha to Remove Dangerous Lead Paint - U.S. Sen. Tammy Baldwin - Oct 7th, 2024
Read more about Lead Crisis here
How are removed lead pipes “recycled” safely? Are there industrial uses for lead in other applications, and is it safe?
Will “acitivists “accept yes for as answer?
This article caused me to do a little quick research.
The article below published just five days ago by The Brookings Institution seems chock full of great data. (Well, if it weren’t so depressing. I mean I remember hearing about lead in pipes since I was in junior high in the early 70s…)
https://www.brookings.edu/articles/what-would-it-cost-to-replace-all-the-nations-lead-water-pipes/#:~:text=The%20federal%20government%20banned%20the,service%20lines%20across%20the%20country.
“What has the government done to reduce lead exposure?”
“As a result of federal laws and regulations, including the 1973 phase out of lead in automobile gasoline, the 1978 ban on lead paint for residential and consumer use, the 1991 Lead and Copper Rule, and the 1995 ban on lead in solder in food cans, the median lead concentration in the blood of children aged 1 to 5 years dropped from 15 micrograms per deciliter in 1976-1980 to 0.7 micrograms per deciliter in 2013-2014. The JAMA Pediatrics study, however, found that half of 1.1 million American children under 6 tested positive for lead in their blood. Despite some progress in reducing the number of homes served by lead pipes, however, lead in drinking water remains an unresolved problem.”
***
Much more on the impact lead has on cognitive ability, crime, and ability to function in the workplace, etc. And, the likely drop in crime in the 1990s impacted by banning leaded gas in the 1980s. (!)
Biggest obstacles are record keeping (maps and knowing where the lead pipes are), funding (it appears the total need is very close to the $45M Biden proposed before the federal allocation was whittled to $15M, and the fact that government can only address public pipes directly. Ledge pipes still exist on private property.
I did not know that Madison took a great step forward a couple decades ago and ripped out all public lead pipe lines.
The painfully slow arc of progress…I’d rather have good pipes than some of the other “accomplishments” humanity has achieved.