The Hard Left Is Afraid of Ideas
Demand that Mike Pence’s book not be published the latest of many such examples.
Not surprisingly, former Vice President Mike Pence is writing a book. Also not surprisingly these days, the staff at Simon & Schuster are in an uproar about it. But here’s something that really is a surprise: the publishing house’s management is staying the course. Good for them.
It has become more or less routine. The morally certain and entitled young staff members of some publication try to dictate what their employer should be allowed to publish. Any ideas that don’t pass the hard-left woke litmus tests must be banned. Only the acceptable ideas can get through.
Also last summer, when the Hachette Publishing Group announced that it would publish Woody Allen’s book, “Apropos of Nothing,” 75 employees walked out in protest. They later met with the CEO who caved to their demands. Allen’s crime? Being accused of a crime. He has been accused of sexually abusing one of his children. He denies it. He’s never been prosecuted, much less convicted. There used to be this quaint idea in this country of the presumption of innocence, but for the woke left that goes out the window when the accusation is any kind of sexual harassment or abuse. In that case, the accused is guilty. Full stop.
And now the Pence book. About 200 Simon & Schuster staff members and writers signed a petition demanding that the company drop the project. An online petition has gathered several thousand signatures beyond the company. But this time corporate leaders have not caved.
CEO Jonathan Karp has said that the Pence book will move forward. The staff wokesters say that publishing the book would be, “legitimizing bigotry.” But Karp replied that, “The former vice president who got 74 million votes is representative of a broad range of people.”
He’s right, of course. I’m no fan of Pence, but he was Vice President and he may run for President. I may find some of his views objectionable, but his explanation for and background surrounding the events of the last five years are certainly important. If nothing else, the book will be of some use to historians.
Look, I don’t like Josh Hawley either. His decision to object to the certification of electoral votes opened the door to the January 6th violence. Among other rather despicable things, he has fed Donald Trump’s lies about the legitimacy of our elections. But Hawley’s book is about the influence and power of big tech and would seem to take a view that the left would agree with. It had nothing to do with the insurrection. The guy’s a United States Senator with a large following and a legitimate shot at being elected President some day. I may not like what he thinks, but I want to know what he thinks. And yet Karp caved to the pressure to cancel his book simply because it was written by Hawley.
In response to the Hachette hatchet job on the Woody Allen book, author Stephen King said this: “The Hachette decision to drop the Woody Allen book makes me very uneasy. It’s not him; I don’t give a damn about Mr Allen. It’s who gets muzzled next that worries me … If you think he’s a paedophile, don’t buy the book. Don’t go to his movies. Don’t go listen to him play jazz at the Carlyle Hotel. Vote with your wallet … In America, that’s how we do it.”
“It’s who get muzzled next that worries me.” Exactly. Pence’s book will get published in large part because it will make a bunch of money for Simon & Schuster. But, as even Karp points out, big pay days like that allow publishers to get lots of little known writers into print. Writers whose books don’t make money.
And, ironically, it’s those writers who are most at risk by the self-righteous woke mobs. An author with a point of view that is not orthodox hard-left, but whose book isn’t likely to make much money, is less likely to get published because it’s just not worth the headaches for management.
It comes down to this. The hard-left is afraid of ideas. My own view (and what used to be the view of American liberals) is that bad ideas should be exposed. Let them fall of their own weight. But the woke believe that we must be protected from all those bad ideas out there because we are not graced with their finely tuned sense of moral certainty.
Still, Karp’s rather courageous decision on the Pence book strikes at least some kind of blow for free speech. I probably won’t read Mike Pence’s book, but I’m glad it will be available for me to ignore.
Op-Ed
-
Unlocking Milwaukee’s Potential Through Smart Zoning Reform
Jul 5th, 2024 by Ariam Kesete -
We Energies’ Natural Gas Plans Are A Mistake
Jun 28th, 2024 by John Imes -
Milwaukee Needs New Kind of School Board
Jun 26th, 2024 by Jordan Morales
Hey Dave – Call me when the “hard left” gets hours of air time allowed for their ideas on AM radio, and when there’s an entire Left-Wing book ecosystem that buys up books in bulk and allows legitimacy to illegitimate ideas. You know, just like how righties like Mike Pence get.
There’s a reason you have no political career remaining in Madison, Dave. Because of clueless takes like this.
Dave Cieslewicz raises a legitimate issue and then proceeds to use, actually misuse, language to try to thread the needle from what seeks to be the “reasonable” right, contrasting it to the “hard, entitled, woke, left.” Because the “hard left” is trying to kill ideas, an extremely unlikely outcome given the number of right-wing publishing houses around, he believes that these mainstream houses have a responsibility to publish the “ultra-conservative” Tom Cotton and the non-labeled Mike Pence and Josh Hawley.
Let’s try a different set of assumptions and labels. Would these publishing houses, in Dave Cieslewicz’ free exchange of ideas system, have a responsibility to publish” Mein Kampf” or “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion”? Come on!!! Give me a break!! There is no comparison. This is just more woke crap, right?
Well, not being “woke” or on the “hard left,” I find striking similarities between Trump, who Pence served as a faithful, sycophantic, lying lap dog, and Adolph Hitler. (See the recent “Hitler: Ascent”, by Volker Ullrich if you think this is ridiculous hyperbole. The personality similarities are quite striking.) Then, there are Cotton, the ultra-conservative, and Hawley, who has “a legitimate shot at being elected president.” Cotton and Hawley are fascists, not ultra-conservatives. More woke exaggeration? (See “The Anatomy of Fascism” by Robert O. Paxton, “What is Fascism?”, pages 218-220, not quite a perfect fit with Trumpism, Cottonism or Hawleyism, but close enough, and a checklist that describes much of America in our times.)
On January 6, extremists and fascists tried to overthrow American democracy. Here is a bet I would be happy to make with Dave Cieslewicz: I’ll bet a large sum of money that your persecuted authors, Cotton and Hawley, were involved in these events before January 6.
The danger of “the left” gaining power and destroying democracy in this country is zero. The threat from the far-right is a flashing yellow light. Dave Cieslewicz might want to put that on his worry list.
Glad to see Urban Milwaukee proceeding with OP Eds like this and the debate they will invite. Piercing the information bubbles we all increasingly seem to occupy is one of the best contributions for a resilient democracy that a news organization can make.
Hard left? When I read it I started laughing. The rights treason agenda is out in the open, trying to equate it with those on the left is a joke.
kmurphy: You make a great point. Urban Milwaukee pieces often make you realize that everything isn’t simple and binary:yes/no or/Fox/MSNBC. A good place to say, “I hadn’t thought of that” and to be willing to learn and say, God Forbid, “I may be wrong about….,” just not about Trump, Pence, Cotton and Hawley, not too mention Woody Allen.
It is striking that, lacking proposals that would improve people’s lives, the Trumpist far right has fallen back on accusations of wokeness and cancel culture. I am puzzled that folks on the left wish to feed them.