Facial Recognition Resolution Passes
Unanimous vote asks Sheriff's office to adopt guidelines to protect civil liberties.

Milwaukee County Courthouse. Photo by Graham Kilmer.
The Milwaukee County Board voted in favor of a facial recognition policy that protects civil liberties and minority communities Thursday.
The vote was unanimous in favor of a resolution sponsored by Sup. Juan Miguel Martinez that outlines concerns about facial recognition technology and requests adoption of a policy for the new technology that will preserve civil liberties, protect first amendment rights and prevent criminalization of racial and ethnic minorities in Milwaukee.
The resolution asks the county’s attorneys to work with the county’s Information Management Services Division and the Milwaukee County Sheriff‘s Office (MCSO) to develop a policy. The primary concern for the author is how the sheriff’s office might use facial recognition technology. The resolution asks for a policy preventing the technology being used for surveillance, an approval process for sharing data with facial recognition companies and regular updates on how the technology is used.
Martinez said his resolution is a “simple ask” at the board’s meeting Thursday and pointed to research indicating facial recognition technology is less reliable for people of color and women. “The reason that putting this forward is necessary is that we do not suppress first amendment rights and civil liberties,” he said.
The resolution takes the form of a request because state law does not give the county board authority to direct MCSO policy. The board passed the resolution unanimously.
The Milwaukee County Sheriff’s Office (MCSO) is currently assessing a data-sharing agreement with a Nevada-based company called Biometrica. The firm insists it is not technically a facial recognition company, but a “big data identity management company” that provides access to “third-party” facial recognition algorithms. The MCSO and the Milwaukee Police Department are both interested in Biometrica services for their ability to use a facial recognition tool. MPD is considering providing the company with 2.5 million mugshots in exchange for free access to its services.
The MCSO told supervisors it does not want facial recognition technology to scan random individuals in public, or within existing surveillance systems and cameras. It wants to use the technology to identify suspects in a crime when the MCSO has an image.
“The sheriff’s office has never and will never, nor do we intend to, install it on existing cameras where facial recognition technology is constantly scanning images,” Barkow said.
The board resolution received backing from civic, civil rights and advocacy organizations including the Milwaukee Turners and ACLU of Wisconsin. Those organizations have also been calling on the Milwaukee Common Council to adopt a Community Control over Police Surveillance (CCOPS) ordinance creating a democratic process for reviewing law enforcement surveillance technology and practices.
Some of the items in the CCOPS ordinance echo provisions in the resolution passed by the county board Thursday, including an approval process for new technology and updates on their use.
If you think stories like this are important, become a member of Urban Milwaukee and help support real, independent journalism. Plus you get some cool added benefits.
MKE County
-
Parks Will Resurface 9 Playgrounds This Year
Jun 30th, 2025 by Graham Kilmer
-
Sheriff Creates Community Advisory Board
Jun 30th, 2025 by Graham Kilmer
-
Board Rejects McGovern Senior Center Project
Jun 27th, 2025 by Graham Kilmer
I understand that facial recognition isn’t perfect. However, very few tools are.
I believe that what the board did was a smart move. “You can use the technology. But develop procedures that ensure you understand the limitations.
How many people are being shot in Milwaukee? How many people are hurt by crime? How many drug deaths or adverse effects of drugs?
If surveillance cameras can help solve crimes and protect people, why is that a problem? If I am doing nothing wrong and a license plate reader tracks my car driving around at 1 am, why would I be concerned? If there were a shooting, would we want a camera system that could report on the cars in the area? Maybe it’s a good idea to know who is going to the house where drugs are sold.
I’m not sure what the issue is. Police need to understand that facial recognition isn’t perfect. Camerias can track and show what is happening in an area. If you are doing something you shouldn’t be doing, then I can understand the fear. However, if you aren’t – what is the concern?
“facial recognition” and “protect civil liberties” are mutually exclusive.
It’s both insane and sad folks are falling for this surveillance / police state crap.