Evers Vetoes Nursing Licensure Bill
Evers, Republicans couldn't agree on supervision requirements.
Gov. Tony Evers, as expected, vetoed a bill Thursday that would have allowed nurses with advanced credentials — Advanced Practice Registered Nurses (APRNs) — to have more autonomy and practice independently.
Evers said in his veto message that he objected to “new licensure and practice standards for APRNs, especially those APRNs practicing independently, that do not provide adequate experience requirements, titling protections and safeguards for patients who may be treated for chronic pain management.”
Evers added that nurses are critical to the health care system in Wisconsin and help fill gaps in access to health care, but that “ensuring we have qualified professionals who have the appropriate education, training, experience and supervision to provide care to Wisconsinites is critically important.”
The bill, SB 145, would have created a new license for advanced practice registered nurses, including certified nurse-midwives, certified registered nurse anesthetists, clinical nurse specialists and nurse practitioners, administered by the state nursing board. It would have allowed certified APRNs to practice on their own after they’ve worked with a doctor or dentist for about three years.
The veto was expected as Evers had said that there were certain changes to the legislation that would have helped garner his support, including requiring four years of supervision before an APRN is able to practice independently, setting additional supervision requirements for some APRNs working in pain management and adding language barring non-doctors, including APRNs, from using certain titles associated with doctors, but none of those changes were made. Democrats had tried to add an amendment to the bill that would have addressed Evers’ concerns, but it was ultimately rejected.
Sen. Patrick Testin (R-Stevens Point) called the veto “utterly ridiculous and downright irresponsible.” He said lawmakers had already compromised on certain parts of the bill.
“Given the importance of this legislation, we gave Gov. Evers some of the things he wanted and made compromises in other key areas,” Testin said. “Yet, he still made the reckless decision to turn his back on our health care workers and over one million Wisconsinites who live in underserved areas.”
The Wisconsin Medical Society praised Evers’ veto in a statement, saying that the bill “lacked the minimum levels of patient protections we believe are needed for a state to move toward allowing independent nursing health care practice.”
Evers said that he welcomes “the opportunity to sign a version of this proposal that addresses these outstanding issues and I look forward to working with nurses, doctors and legislators toward a bipartisan proposal I am hopeful to enact during the next legislative session.”
Evers vetoes advanced nurse practitioner bill was originally published by Wisconsin Examiner.
Another poor decision made by Evers that will cost our state lives because of special interest pressure on him.
Actually Ryan, Evers vetoed a bill that, had RRRs (radical reactionary republicans) worked with the governor and addressed his concerns (which are mine as well) no veto would have been required. What is pathetic, is the justification of RRRs for NOT working with the governor.
RRRs seem to be unskilled at and unwilling to govern in a democratic republic (DR.) Governance in a DR (the form of government the US and Wisconsin constitutions outline) is a shared responsibility of the legislature, governor, and the voters. This requires sharing power. Governance is not a game of who has the most power. For power must always rest with, “We the People…”.
I tend to agree with MK Wagner. Why wasn’t there some coordination?
The Wisconsin Medical Society praised Evers’ veto in a statement, saying that the bill “lacked the minimum levels of patient protections we believe are needed for a state to move toward allowing independent nursing health care practice.”
Evers said that he welcomes “the opportunity to sign a version of this proposal that addresses these outstanding issues, and I look forward to working with nurses, doctors, and legislators toward a bipartisan proposal I am hopeful to enact during the next legislative session.”
Funny, R could’ve adopted the amendments (that are all very logical and should be present) and it would’ve passed.
Funny how this is being spun up as partisan politics when it’s so obvious that one side refuses to play ball. Now the do-nothings point the finger (of course never at themselves) and nothing gets resolved.
Agree. . . there should have been a solution.
It is also interesting how those who “support law enforcement” don’t want to fully fund state crime labs.