Evers Seeks Compromise on Republican PFAS Bill
Threatens veto of GOP plan, saying 'I'm not signing bill letting polluters off the hook.'
Democratic Gov. Tony Evers is proposing a compromise to GOP lawmakers that would provide $125 million to help local governments and landowners address PFAS pollution.
The request comes as Evers has all but promised to veto a Republican bill that passed the Legislature to address contamination from so-called forever chemicals known as PFAS, short for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances.
Evers has signaled concerns with provisions in the GOP plan that would limit the authority of the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources to test for and clean up the chemicals. The governor called those a “poison pill” that gives polluters a free pass.
“In Wisconsin, if someone pollutes our water, property, and natural resources, Wisconsinites expect them to pay to clean it up. That’s just common sense,” Evers said in a statement. “I’m not signing a bill that lets polluters off the hook for cleaning up their contamination and asks Wisconsin taxpayers to foot the bill. No way.”
The legislation sponsored by Green Bay Republican Sens. Eric Wimberger and Rob Cowles would prevent the DNR from taking enforcement action against people deemed “innocent landowners” as long as they let the agency clean up the chemicals at the state’s expense.
Evers said Tuesday his compromise is “functionally identical” to the GOP bill, minus those provisions. It would also guarantee release of the state funds, providing $100 million in municipal grants and $25 million in grants for landowners.
Sen. Kelda Roys, D-Madison, who sits on the Legislature’s Joint Committee on Finance, said legislators shouldn’t be playing politics with people’s water.“To me, it’s very simple. Every Wisconsinite should have the freedom to drink clean safe water from their tap, and the Legislature has the obligation to make sure they’re able to exercise that freedom,” Roys said. “I’m hopeful that Republicans will finally come to the table on this and pass this latest compromise.”
Evers’ offer comes as time is running out on the legislative session
The governor’s offer comes as time is running out on the current legislative session, which could limit Evers’ options to getting an agreement he can support.
Should Evers veto the GOP bill, practically speaking, there’s no more time for the full Legislature to send another alternative to his desk. The state Assembly adjourned for the year last week, meaning the PFAS bill they sent Evers amounts to the full Legislature’s final offer.
At least initially, the GOP co-chairs of that committee did not signal any interest in Evers’ offer. In a written statement, Sen. Howard Marklein, R-Spring Green, and Rep. Mark Born, R-Beaver Dam, said Republicans already prioritized dealing with PFAS contamination with the combination of the $125 million they set aside in the budget and the bill that passed the Legislature this month.“Governor Evers should sign it instead of holding up these funds to give the DNR authority to penalize innocent landowners,” the co-chairs wrote.
Wimberger, who also sits on the committee, said in a statement Tuesday that the governor’s request only touches on two provisions within the bill that would turn the money set aside under the budget into a slush fund.“[T]he Governor’s funding request simply can’t stand up the programs and the changes in law needed to effectively address the problems on the ground and doesn’t deliver the solutions that victims and affected communities are asking for,” Wimberger said.
Evers’ latest request for the PFAS funding comes after the governor first asked the Legislature’s finance committee to release the money in December and again during his State of the State address in January.
Evers seeks deal as alternative to Republican PFAS bill was originally published by Wisconsin Public Radio.
If you think stories like this are important, become a member of Urban Milwaukee and help support real, independent journalism. Plus you get some cool added benefits.
More about the PFAS Problem
- Wisconsin Supreme Court Hears Challenge to State Authority in PFAS Case - Danielle Kaeding - Jan 14th, 2025
- Legislature Will Try Again On Regulating Forever Chemical Contamination - Danielle Kaeding - Jan 3rd, 2025
- EPA Adds Nine Additional PFAS to the Toxics Release Inventory - U.S. Environmental Protection Agency - Jan 3rd, 2025
- Coalition of 30 Groups Calls for $953 Million Funding For Safe Drinking Water - Danielle Kaeding - Dec 24th, 2024
- Insurers Add PFAS Exclusions to Liability Policies - Danielle Kaeding - Dec 21st, 2024
- EPA Releases Draft Health-Based Recommendations for PFAS Levels in Bodies of Water - U.S. Environmental Protection Agency - Dec 19th, 2024
- EPA Launches New Studies and Data Collection Efforts to Better Protect Communities from PFAS - U.S. Environmental Protection Agency - Dec 16th, 2024
- More than 30 groups call on State Legislature to take action on safe drinking water for Safe Drinking Water Act 50th anniversary - Wisconsin Conservation Voters - Dec 5th, 2024
- EPA Launches New Initiative to Tackle PFAS, Identify Emerging Contaminants in Water - U.S. Environmental Protection Agency - Nov 20th, 2024
- Environmental & Public Health Groups Urge Wisconsin Supreme Court to Reject Attempt by WMC to Undermine State’s Spills Law - Midwest Environmental Advocates - Nov 18th, 2024
Read more about PFAS Problem here