Possible Revival For Kenosha-Racine-Milwaukee Commuter Rail Line
KRM project, killed in 2011, would connect lakefront communities in southern Wisconsin.
Work is underway on reviving the long-contemplated Kenosha-Racine-Milwaukee (KRM) commuter rail line.
The 33-mile line would follow the lakefront from the Chicago-focused Metra station in Kenosha north to downtown Milwaukee, linking several south suburban communities with a 53-minute end-to-end trip.
Backed by Senator Tammy Baldwin, the City of Racine received a $5 million federal grant in 2022 to update a more than decade-old plan. A new study will explore updated station locations and funding mechanisms, which could include directing property tax revenue from real estate development near the line. The federal government is expected to cover a substantial portion of the construction costs, if local funding is identified.
“Studying and engineering is the work that is about to start,” said City Engineer Kevin Muhs to the City of Milwaukee Public Works Committee on Nov. 29. In the ensuing weeks, the Common Council and Mayor Cavalier Johnson formally endorsed Racine restarting the planning effort, but did not commit specific Milwaukee financial resources to the project.
“There’s a long way to go. This is not something that’s imminent by any means,” said Muhs.
“Probably in the category of wishful thinking,” said committee chair Alderman Robert Bauman of the effort.
The KRM project was first studied in the late 1990s, with a preferred route and configuration identified in 2006. In 2009, the Democratic-controlled Wisconsin State Legislature granted a regional transit authority (RTA) responsible for the project the ability to levy an up-to $18 rental car tax to fund the KRM’s operations. And in 2010, the RTA applied for federal support to perform engineering on what was estimated as a $233 million project.
But Republicans took control of the Legislature and, with Representative Robin Vos leading the way, killed the proposal in 2011. Vos, who represents southern Racine County, had switched from supporting initial funding to calling it part of a liberal Democrat agenda.
An $18 million federal grant to fund the KRM’s initial operating costs was redirected to bus systems in Kenosha, Racine and Milwaukee counties. The $1.2 million remaining from an initial $2 rental car tax was split between the counties.
Bauman attributed the project’s prior failure to the inability of Democrats to advance the project when they controlled the state government. Infighting about potentially funding the Milwaukee, Racine and Kenosha bus systems with a sales tax delayed the KRM project, until Republicans, including Scott Walker, were elected in fall 2010.
Compared to the inland Amtrak Hiawatha Service line, the KRM service would stop more frequently and operate at lower speeds. A total of 14 round trips per day were contemplated in the most recent plan.
The lakefront line would operate on freight tracks owned by Union Pacific. It would cross over onto tracks owned by Canadian Pacific, that feed into the Milwaukee Intermodal Station, near E. Greenfield Avenue in the Harbor District. A subsidy agreement for Komatsu Mining‘s South Harbor Campus development includes a purchase option for Milwaukee to acquire land near the site for a station.
The Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission (SEWRPC), which Muhs formerly led, is providing technical support for Racine’s study effort.
Racine Mayor Cory Mason, who previously supported the project during his time in the State Assembly, is a key proponent of reviving the idea, believing there’s still a need for the project. “We think it’s greater now than what it was 10 years ago,” said the mayor in May.
The KRM line is called for in the SEWRPC Vision 2050 plan and the State of Wisconsin‘s 2050 rail plan.
It was expected that the Metra line running between Kenosha, Waukegan and Chicago was to synchronize its schedule so riders could transfer between the KRM and Metra lines.
Two private companies are also said to be interested in creating commuter rail service in the Milwaukee area. But neither has significantly advanced, despite one seeking federal support for developing the KRM project.
“We actually did submit to the [Federal Transit Administration] to get into the New Starts program on behalf of [Wisconsin Transit & Realty Group],” said state chief of railroads and harbors Lisa Stern to a city committee in March 2023. “We had developed an agreement with them so there would be no costs to the state.” But the application had to be withdrawn because the for-profit company didn’t have the funding to move forward.
A separate company, Transit Innovations, is pursuing a different plan to connect the western suburbs. It involves substantial real estate development near the stations.
Legislation Link - Urban Milwaukee members see direct links to legislation mentioned in this article. Join today
If you think stories like this are important, become a member of Urban Milwaukee and help support real, independent journalism. Plus you get some cool added benefits.
Related Legislation: File 231075
Political Contributions Tracker
Displaying political contributions between people mentioned in this story. Learn more.
- February 20, 2016 - Cavalier Johnson received $250 from Robert Bauman
Transportation
-
MCTS Adds 28 New Buses
Jul 13th, 2024 by Graham Kilmer -
MCTS Designing New Bus Shelters
Jul 10th, 2024 by Graham Kilmer -
MCTS Updates RNC Bus Detours To Better Serve Downtown, Riders
Jul 9th, 2024 by Jeramey Jannene
l love trains and train rides. great idea, i hope it will happen.
With all of the building going along the I-94 corridor, recruiting workers for these sites would be easier if public transportation was available. Regular bus service could be set up to get workers to these companies whose services are most often labor intensive. Such service makes too much sense and I am sure Republicans will do everything they can to kill it.
Glad to see these conversations revived, but regretfully I must agree with Ald. Bauman. A stronger consensus is needed that will span elections and survive administration changes.
We had a chance at this concept when Tony Earl decided to let
perfect stand in the way of good. He vetoed the plan because it didn’t
meet his criteria. (It was an issue of integration with a larger plan.)
Apparently it never occurred to him that plans and even facilities
can be changed later. Knowing that Walker and his ilk wouldn’t allow it at all,
he should’ve seized the moment and let “perfection” come later.
(Current officials should note this.)
The success of this plan will depend on plentiful and
well-placed transfer facilities both bus-train and train-train.
Don’t neglect taxi facilities at major interchanges.
The handicap have special needs.
Baggage on buses can get unwieldy
this could be interesting
This is an exciting idea and is more relevant now than when it was first proposed because of the growth and potential for growth along the corridor it covers. However, we must get policies, legislation, funding, and planning in place to advance this project rather than let it go dormant for decades. The original feasibility study was in 1998, and the Kenosha-Racine-Milwaukee (KRM) Rail Project Steering Committee worked from 2005, but the project was stopped in 2011 (see https://maps.sewrpc.org/KRMonline/). What can we learn from this delay? We need to recognize that the success of a rail system (in terms of ridership and economic benefit) depends on productive land use at the stations and integrating these rail stations with local transit, including public transit and active transit. There must be much more dense and productive land use at rail stations and ways for people to live and work near these stations (transit-oriented development). While these stations could serve automobile commuters, there must be many more means for people to get to and from these station areas without a car–ranging from transit, rideshare, bicycling, and walking. A public-private partnership can give the framework for planning and funding based on the market potential for housing, businesses, offices, and industry near these regional rail stations. There are excellent ideas and ways to proceed by examining regional rail’s success (and failures) worldwide.