Milwaukee Faces Cruise Ship Arms Race
Will new dock secure success for Port Milwaukee? Or will Chicago and Duluth steal the business?
Milwaukee finds itself in the middle of an unusual arms race: which Great Lakes port can build the best cruise ship dock?
Port Milwaukee, the city-owned agency led by Adam Tindall-Schlicht, has used existing docks to land initial commitments for highly-coveted cruise ship turnaround service. Turnarounds, which include the end of one trip and the start of another, double the number of passengers, generate hotel stays and provide ancillary revenue from the sale of supplies to the vessels.
“The cruise market on the Great Lakes is a new and burgeoning industry,” said port marketing director Jazmine Jurkiewicz to the Public Works Committee on Sept. 8. “It is very much a boutique experience for the discerning traveler.”
It’s new enough that ports are now rushing to catch up with larger vessels entering the market. Milwaukee is using the city’s industrial Heavy Lift Dock for the new Viking Cruises Octantis ship, a 666-foot-long vessel that can accommodate 378 guests and 250 crew members. The Seaway-max-sized vessel is the largest capable of entering the Great Lakes and a twin ship is expected to enter the market next year.
Port Milwaukee is pursuing a $7.2 million project to build the South Shore Cruise Dock, a new facility capable of receiving the Octantis and other large vessels at the southern end of S. Carferry Dr. But its cost could grow to include dedicated electrical, water and sewer lines as well as improved dredging and baggage handling.
“What keeps me up at night is if we don’t build South Shore correctly, Duluth is building a fantastic dock that will include all of these features,” said Tindall-Schlicht at an Aug. 11 Board of Harbor Commissioners meeting. “Chicago coming online at Navy Pier keeps me up. Duluth and their investment in their downtown dock keeps me up.”
The harbor commission approved allocating approximately $80,000 in additional funding for Collins Engineers, Inc. to expand its dock design effort.
Tindall-Schlicht said the initial design, which got underway in February 2021, was for the “bare minimum.” But the city is learning from its experience serving the Octantis, which currently involves stringing thousands of feet of hoses, cables and other infrastructure to the vessel. He called the expanded request a “Shangri-La” proposal, though the elements proposed include basic infrastructure like built-in sewer pipes.
“These are all elements that we are indeed seeing in real-time that Viking is paying us to provide for them,” said Tindall-Schlicht. He said Viking would work with Collins to help identify the best configuration.
Other ports, said Tindall-Schlicht, are moving to add these features which could result in Viking and others selecting them for turnaround service. Chicago currently uses a dock on its far south side, near the Indiana border, but could explore using Navy Pier as leases begin to expire in 2024.
“There might not be tough competition today, but there will be in the future,” said harbor commission chair Timothy Hoelter in summarizing the situation.
Pier Wisconsin already includes the “Shangri-La” features like built-in utility infrastructure. It’s also closer to Downtown. Why not expand it or find another closer to the heart of the city? It’s a question Alderman Robert Bauman asked last week when the Public Works Committee reviewed part of the new dock’s financing.
“The key here is the federal navigation channel,” said Tindall-Schlicht. Pier Wisconsin works for smaller cruise ships, but not Seaway-max vessels. Port staff said it would cost millions more to complete just the necessary dredging to expand the water depth at Pier Wisconsin by more than five feet. Going upriver isn’t an option because the large ships can’t make the necessary turns. “For us to expand Pier Wisconsin would be triple, four times the cost.”
The city is getting some help in its quest to build the new dock. The state is providing $3.5 million. Governor Tony Evers announced the award, from the state’s American Rescue Plan Act grant, at a February press conference. The Public Works Committee meeting was to formally accept the money.
The project is also backed by a $500,000 Harbor Assistance Program grant from 2021 that is administered by the state but relies on federal funding.
Tindall-Schlicht said the dock, once planned to be completed in 2023, would open in 2024 at the earliest. In August he told Urban Milwaukee that Port Milwaukee hoped to identify the remaining funding sources, at least $2 million, by December when construction bidding could begin.
Port Milwaukee had once considered developing the new cruise ship dock alongside Komatsu Mining‘s South Harbor Campus development, but the port director said in February a closer evaluation revealed it was cheaper to develop it on the outer harbor. Funding from the city land sale that enabled that campus to move forward is anticipated to be one of the project’s funding sources.
The cruise ship dock is being built atop a 50-acre landfill created in 1975 as part of an environmental cleanup effort. A portion of the facility is already leased to the Lake Express ferry for its dock and offices. The northern 30 acres will be part of a new cleanup effort starting in 2023 and a new facility will be constructed to the north.
The port is expected to generate $150,000 in direct revenue from the 33 cruise ship visits in 2022, and the Milwaukee area to gain a $2.25 million regional economic impact, according to port officials. In addition to Viking and Pearl Seas, vessels from American Queen Voyages (the former Victory Cruise Lines), Ponant Explorers and Vantage have visited Milwaukee.
Milwaukee will become the cruise ship capital of the Great Lakes on Sept. 24 and 25. For the second time this year, three ships will call on the city’s port on the same weekend.
Great Lakes cruise operators, owing to the 1886 Passenger Vessel Services Act and the reliance on foreign-made vessels, transport passengers on one-way trips between American and Canadian ports. Only American-made vessels can transport passengers between U.S. ports, though the ships can stop in consecutive U.S. ports provided all passengers return to the vessel.
Viking Octantis Tour Photos From Inaugural Visit
May 20, Three-Ship Weekend Photos
If you think stories like this are important, become a member of Urban Milwaukee and help support real, independent journalism. Plus you get some cool added benefits.
There may be a lot I don’t understand about this situation but I do know Milwaukee can’t compete with Navy Pier.
And, according to a 5/10 article in the Duluth News Tribune, “The [Duluth] cruise ship passenger terminal on the Harbor Drive side of the Duluth Entertainment Convention Center will be completed later [in May], just in time for the first cruise ship since 2013 to dock in Duluth’s harbor.” The new terminal was opened to coincide with the Cruise the Great Lakes annual meeting which was being held at the DECC in early May.
Wow. Envious yet?
My thinking is that if dredging Pier Wisconsin to accommodate these bigger ships will cost $30 million (3-4x the current “Shangri-la” plan cost of $7.2 million) then someone should go out and find the money. I’m serious. Is Milwaukee committed to building its tourism industry or is it satisfied losing this business to others because it’s going to piddle around trying to pimp out a windswept landfill.
Hello, people…make no small plans.
Would other stops in the Great Lakes mean not stopping here? We have a city to be proud of with many attractions during the cruise season. This is only an “all or nothing” situation if we do nothing.
I have it interesting that funding for a number of infrastructure has come from the American Recuse Act from which the Governor has discretion on how the funds could be used. Republicans can commit over a billion dollars in tax money for a boondoggle like Foxconn and deliberately not fund local projects which make sense and have the support of the people.
It has seemed to me for more than 12 yrs or so, that the repubs really, REALLY want to starve MKE of money for literally anything….education? cut state support; police?, cut state support; infrastructure? cut state supprt.
Not clear why they want to destroy the biggest city in the state, but that certainly seems to be their goal.
They really never cared whether Foxconn was viable. If they had, they would have done due diligence on the proposal and they did not. They should be ashamed and embarrassed. The only remaining question is if any of the leaders of that giant con approval was paid off by Foxconn. We’ll probably never know. for sure.
I say improve the port. We could make a great stop on the way. Some really great travel memories come from the smallest or less famous places.
The so-called South Shore Cruise Dock is a distinctly bad idea. It would be a gateway located far from any attractions and a really challenging drop-off place for cruise passengers attempting to visit our city. It would be absolutely uncompetitive with other ports-of-call vying for Great Lakes cruise business.
We need to locate our cruise terminal downtown to take advantage of the best we have to offer – our awesome visuals, readily available sightseeing, and visitor-friendly walk-around opportunities. This could be a very good piece of business for Milwaukee. Let’s do our best thinking!