Ethics Board Must Hire Outside Counsel. Why?
Confidential opinion involves City Attorney. Bauman thinks he's solved the mystery.
The City of Milwaukee Ethics Board needs to prepare a confidential opinion, a fairly standard request for the citizen-led board.
But in this case, it involves the City Attorney and, as a result, the Ethics Board is unable to use the city’s in-house attorneys.
Board chair Patricia Hintz appeared before the Judiciary & Legislation Committee Monday to secure approval to hire an outside attorney that was recommended by the City Attorney’s Office.
The resolution pending before the Common Council would allow the Madison-based firm of Boardman & Clark to charge the city up to $15,000 at up to $300 per hour.
Alderman Robert Bauman asked if it involved a “certain real estate transaction,” no doubt a reference to City Attorney Tearman Spencer‘s declaration that Bauman committed an ethics violation in getting Barrett Lo Visionary Development to contribute to an anti-displacement fund in exchange for its requested liability shield on The Couture development. The city will now spend up to $100,000 on outside counsel and a third-party judge to determine who was right.
Committee chair Ald. Ashanti Hamilton asked if it created a conflict that the City Attorney’s Office suggested the firm.
Hintz said she didn’t believe so, given that the firm was from outside Milwaukee.
Assistant City Attorney Peter Block noted that a sanitized version of the issue would appear next year in the list of 2021 Ethics Board opinions.
The committee unanimously approved the request, and then moved to review the 2020 report.
She said the board is now functioning well with seven members and is able to avoid quorum issues.
Hamilton said word of the board’s stability and efficiency has made its way to him. “I just want to say thank you for that,” he said.
Final approval of the hiring of an outside attorney still requires a majority vote of the full Common Council.
If you think stories like this are important, become a member of Urban Milwaukee and help support real, independent journalism. Plus you get some cool added benefits.
More about the Turmoil at the City Attorney's Office
- Court Finds Probable Cause In Spencer Misconduct Case - Graham Kilmer - Nov 5th, 2024
- Former City Attorney Tearman Spencer Charged with Felony Misconduct - Jeramey Jannene - Oct 2nd, 2024
- Tearman Spencer’s Deputy Criminally Charged With Misconduct in Public Office - Jeramey Jannene - Jun 27th, 2024
- Evan Goyke Ousts Tearman Spencer As City Attorney - Jeramey Jannene - Apr 2nd, 2024
- City Spends $77,000 To Resolve Harassment Claim Against Spencer - Jeramey Jannene - Mar 19th, 2024
- City Hall: Milwaukee Will Pay More Than $60,000 To Settle Tearman Spencer Harassment Claim - Jeramey Jannene - Feb 21st, 2024
- How Will Council Handle Scathing Report on City Attorney? - Jeramey Jannene - Nov 14th, 2023
- City Attorney Spencer Faces Inspector’s Call For Ouster, Likely Violation Of Discrimination Law - Jeramey Jannene - Nov 9th, 2023
- City Hall: Another Former Assistant City Attorney Files Discrimination Claim - Jeramey Jannene - Feb 20th, 2023
- City Hall: Former City Attorneys File Discrimination Claims - Jeramey Jannene - Nov 14th, 2022
Read more about Turmoil at the City Attorney's Office here