State Supreme Court Rejects Redistricting Rule Change
GOP backed lawsuit wanted all redistricting legal challenges to be heard by supreme court.
Justices on Wisconsin’s Supreme Court have rejected an effort by conservatives to change the rules for the next round of redistricting, denying a petition that would have required all redistricting lawsuits to run through them.
States redraw their political boundaries every decade after the U.S. Census to make sure districts are roughly equal in population. The high-stakes process carries huge political implications and inevitably leads to lawsuits.
A petition by the Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty would have required any redistricting lawsuit to be handled as an “original action” before the Wisconsin Supreme Court, meaning it would bypass lower courts. The governor and Legislature could present their own redistricting plans and outside groups could also intervene.
While justices rejected the proposal, they did not rule out the possibility of hearing a redistricting case.
“Our decision in this rule matter should not be deemed predictive of this court’s response to a petition for review asking this court to review a lower court’s ruling on a redistricting challenge or a request that we assume original jurisdiction over a future redistricting case or controversy,” wrote the court. “It remains well-settled that redistricting challenges often merit this court’s exercise of its original jurisdiction.”
While the petition was based on the idea that redistricting is fundamentally a responsibility of state government, it also reflected the political reality that conservatives hold a 4-3 majority on the Wisconsin Supreme Court.
But during a hearing on the petition, justices were openly skeptical of the idea, particularly a provision that gave the court the power to draw political boundaries itself. Conservative Justice Patience Roggensack suggested during the hearing that the proposal raised both constitutional and practical concerns, saying that the court was ill-equipped to handle map-drawing even if it wanted to.
Opponents of the petition celebrated the court’s decision Friday.
But WILL noted in a written statement of its own that the court’s decision did not preclude justices from taking redistricting cases if they want to.
“The Court has determined the proposed rule is not needed, but has made clear that rejection of the rule does not mean the Court will reject its jurisdictional role with respect to redistricting,” said WILL president Rick Esenberg.
Even though the Census data that forms the building blocks of redistricting isn’t expected to be available until August, courts have already been busy dealing with preliminary cases.
Last month, a circuit court judge voided contracts Wisconsin Republican lawmakers reached with two private law firms to handle redistricting, ruling the state Legislature can’t hire its own attorneys until there’s a lawsuit pending. Republicans have appealed that case.
Listen to the WPR report here.
Wisconsin Supreme Court Rejects Proposal To Change Redistricting Rules was originally published by Wisconsin Public Radio.
- Rushed Redistricting Bill Drafted In March - Melanie Conklin - Jun 13th, 2021
- Rep. Robyn Vining Urges Passage of Fair Maps Legislation - State Rep. Robyn Vining - May 19th, 2021
- Capitol Rally For Nonpartisan Redistricting - Shawn Johnson - May 18th, 2021
- Fight For Fair Maps Heats Up - Ruth Conniff - May 16th, 2021
- State Supreme Court Rejects Redistricting Rule Change - Shawn Johnson - May 14th, 2021
- Law Forward on Supreme Court Rejection of Redistricting Rulemaking Petition - Law Forward - May 14th, 2021
- Republicans Lose Lawyers Before Redistricting Starts - State Sen. Melissa Agard - Apr 29th, 2021
- Judge Prohibits Republicans Using Private Lawyers for Redistricting - Shawn Johnson - Apr 29th, 2021
- Op Ed: How Gerrymandered Are We? - Kevin Baas - Apr 29th, 2021
- Murphy’s Laws: The New Gerrymandering Scheme - Bruce Murphy - Apr 27th, 2021
Read more about Gerrymandering of Legislative Districts here