Redistricting Should Consider Native Americans
Their vote has been diluted by discriminatory redistricting practices.
My name is Tehassi tasi, I am bear clan and my nation is people of the standing stone. I am the chairman for the Oneida Nation, and I would like to share some information about our perspective on Wisconsin’s redistricting process.
You may ask, what is “redistricting?” Redistricting is the process of redrawing congressional and (in this case) state legislative district boundaries every 10 years.
The Oneida Nation operates a multifaceted government operation, successful business ventures and a wide array of community development projects. We have 149 direct-service programs, while employing approximately 2,100 people. The purpose of our inherent right to self-governance is to protect the health, safety and welfare of our members while protecting our culture, revitalizing our language and restoring the environment to improve the quality of life for the community as a whole.
There are 11 federally recognized tribes in Wisconsin. Each tribe has its own unique history, tradition, customs and languages. In addition, each has democratically elected governments, which provide leadership and services to their citizens. As with any population, there are differences in social, economic and geographic conditions in Native American communities.
I recently testified before The People’s Map Commission to provide insight about the Oneida Nation’s priorities with respect to Wisconsin’s redistricting process.
The Oneida Nation supports an independent redistricting process.
Since the redistricting process focuses on where populations reside, we believe it’s important for policymakers to understand the historical and contemporary experiences of Native Americans throughout the U.S. — specifically how federal relocation, allotment, termination and assimilation initiatives have determined where and how Native Americans live today.
Nationally, Native American voters have been marginalized through discriminatory redistricting practices such as: racial and cultural vote dilution, intimidation, distances to voting locations and forms of voter suppression tactics such as restrictive voter identification requirements.
It is therefore important to not only include tribes in community input sessions but also actively engage each of the individual 11 federally recognized tribes and their leaders in the process.
The Oneida Nation wishes to see stronger Native American communities of interest in the process of determining congressional, state Senate and state Assembly district boundaries. The process should take into account Native American tribes’ historic and contemporary relationship with each other, with the State of Wisconsin and their cultural preservation, sovereignty and economic development objectives.
Further, we believe it is important that the redistricting process recognize both the reservations and urban populations and incorporate to the greatest extent. Again, the goal is to see stronger Native American communities of interest.
Through these recommendations, I hope we can accomplish a fair method that can recognize Native American peoples. We encourage policymakers in the process act with a good heart, a good mind and strong fire.
Tehassi Hill is serving his second term as chairman for the Oneida Nation. Hill is committed to preserving the Oneida’s language, culture and traditions. He was born and raised on the Oneida reservation and continues to live in Oneida, Wisconsin, with his wife and family.
This story was originally published by Milwaukee Neighborhood News Service, where you can find other stories reporting on fifteen city neighborhoods in Milwaukee.
- Your Right to Know: Redistricting Shouldn’t Be Done In Secret - Matthew DeFour - Mar 2nd, 2021
- Redistricting conversation continues on virtual “On the Issues,” Feb. 11 - Marquette University - Feb 10th, 2021
- Op Ed: Redistricting Should Consider Native Americans - Tehassi Hill - Feb 9th, 2021
- Op Ed: Why the War on Masks? Gerrymandering - Mel Barnes - Feb 7th, 2021
- Op Ed: Correct a Cheating System With Fair Maps - State Sen. Jeff Smith - Feb 3rd, 2021
- Will State Supreme Court Draw New Legislative Boundaries? - Shawn Johnson - Jan 15th, 2021
- Data Wonk: Tales Told By The 2020 Election - Bruce Thompson - Dec 31st, 2020
- Court Watch: 2,000 Object to Redistricting Proposal - Gretchen Schuldt - Dec 13th, 2020
- Murphys Law: Beware the GOP Redistricting Proposal - Bruce Murphy - Dec 2nd, 2020
- Op Ed: Dear Wisconsin Supreme Court - Matt Rothschild - Nov 23rd, 2020
Read more about Gerrymandering of Legislative Districts here