Jeramey Jannene

8 Takeaways, How Biden Won Wisconsin

A squeaker victory for Biden due to an odd mix of factors.

By - Nov 4th, 2020 03:09 pm
Joe Biden during a virtual roundtable discussion on rural issues (screenshot).

Joe Biden during a virtual roundtable discussion on rural issues (screenshot).

Political scientists and pundits will spend years dissecting Wisconsin’s 2020 election results. While Wisconsin residents cast a record 3.2 million ballots, the final spread between Joe Biden and Donald Trump was less than 21,000, strikingly similar to the approximately 23,000 vote spread that gave Trump a victory over Hillary Clinton in 2016.

What flipped purple Wisconsin from red back to blue? We examined the data and found eight key factors that explain how Biden won he state:

1.The Diminishing Influence of the City of Milwaukee

If Wisconsin voters went to the polls in record numbers, the state’s biggest city must have had a strong turnout, right? Wrong.

Though Milwaukee is home to about 10% of Wisconsin residents, it represented less than 8% of the votes in the election.

The city cast slightly fewer votes than it did in 2016 (247,679 versus 247,836) and substantially less than it did in 2012 (288,459). You have to go back to 2000 to find a presidential-cycle total the city exceeded (245,670).

The decline in turnout was obscured by the fact that the percentage of votes going for the Democratic candidate grew, from 76.55% in 2016 to 78.83%. The margin between the Democratic candidate and Trump grew from 143,246 to 146,263.

More detailed analysis of ward data will reveal further insight into racial, ethnic or economic disparities in voter turnout. But for now the reality stands that fewer Milwaukeeans are voting while suburban and Dane County vote totals grow.

2. Dane County Ever More Important

While Milwaukee’s influence wanes, Madison’s keeps increasing. Dane County, home to the capital city and its suburbs, delivered more votes for Biden than it did for Clinton as the Democratic margin grew by 34,945 to 181,368.

3. Milwaukee County Surging

Biden also outperformed Clinton in Milwaukee County: he got a higher percentage of the votes and there were more of them. A total of 460,300 votes were cast, compared to 440,247 in 2016. The total trailed the 2008 and 2012 totals, explained in large part by the city turnout.

Biden picked up 69.13% of the county’s votes compared to Clinton’s 65.57%. But Trump also improved, going from 28.61% to 29.28%, a margin which can be explained by a big reduction in Libertarian Party votes.

Mixing all the factors together, the Democratic candidate scored an additional 20,001 votes in Milwaukee County versus 2016.

4. Trump Didn’t Wow the WOW Counties

Milwaukee has long been a blue county surrounded by the red wall of Waukesha, Ozaukee and Washington counties. But Trump, going back to the 2016 Republican primary, has underperformed in the WOW counties. That continued in 2020.

Trump went from a 26.7 point margin in Waukesha County in 2016 to 21 in 2020. He also fell from 18.9 to 12 in Ozaukee County and 40.2 to 38 in Washington County.

His margin in Racine County, +4, remained consistent.

5. Trump’s Up North Appeal

If there was an electoral college of Wisconsin counties, Democrats would lose in a landslide. Biden won only 14 of 72 counties, two more than Clinton (Biden added Door and Sauk counties).

Margins for Trump meanwhile improved in at least 25 counties. Rural voters in Wisconsin are an increasingly conservative voting block.

Which county had the biggest Trump margin? Rural Taylor County in north central Wisconsin (just northwest of Wausau) went for Trump by a 46 point margin, up from 44.2 in 2016.

6. Wisconsin’s COVID Leader Is a Biden Stronghold

Eight out of 100 Menominee County residents have tested positive for COVID-19, a rate that leads Wisconsin and is nearly double the state average.

The county, the state’s smallest by population, and also its poorest, is apparently the state’s most liberal. The 1,586 ballots cast there went for Biden by the largest margin in Wisconsin.

The Democratic candidate won the county by 65 points, up from 56.2 in 2016.

Exit polling will eventually help paint a better picture of how important the federal pandemic response was to voters across the country, but with so many voters casting absentee ballots, in large part because of the pandemic, the results might not be accurate. Exit polls rely on voters agreeing to be surveyed as they exit their polling place.

7. Liberals Did More Absentee Voting

Almost two out of three Wisconsin voters cast their ballots absentee this election, whether it was by mail, dropbox or via in-person early voting. But absentee voters across the state cast a substantially higher percentage of votes for Democrats than Republicans.

Biden won 66% of Milwaukee’s in-person vote, but 84% of the absentee vote. But that later percentage took hours to come in, despite the fact that the city had almost all of the absentee ballots in hand before polls opened.

Milwaukee used three shifts of 400 workers each to process the absentee ballots, but couldn’t start the work until 7 a.m. under state law. It finished around 3:00 a.m. as Milwaukee Election Commission executive director Claire Woodall-Vogg gained a rockstar-like entourage that followed her from the ballot counting operation to the county courthouse.

Similar situations played out in other suburban communities, including Green Bay and Kenosha, the last two to report. Trump appeared to be overperforming, and then the true picture emerged, as the absentee votes were counted.

One thing to watch as results are finalized: over 10,000 Milwaukee voters requested a ballot but didn’t return it. Many of them could have chosen to vote in-person on election day and the city will eventually be able to report out how many voters requested a ballot, but never voted in any form.

8. Could the Green Party or Kanye West Have Given Trump a Win?

Two candidates weren’t on the ballot: Green Party candidate Howie Hawkins and musical artist, Trump friend and Birthday Party candidate Kanye West. The Green Party and West’s Republican-affiliated attorneys both failed to submit the proper nomination signatures by a state-mandated deadline to get on the ballot.

Would they have tipped the scales towards Trump? Probably not. Voters appeared to have a less interest in third-party candidates in 2020.

Libertarian Party nominee Jo Jorgenson was on the Wisconsin ballot, but the party performed worse than it did in 2016 securing only 1.2% of the vote compared to 3.6% in 2016.

Michigan, which like Wisconsin flipped from blue to red in 2016, provides an example of how things might have played out with Hawkins admitted to the ballot in Wisconsin.

In 2016 3.6% of Michigan’s voters cast ballots for Libertarian candidate Gary Johnson and 1.1% towards Green Party candidate Jill Stein.

With 94% of the vote reported in Michigan Wednesday afternoon, the Libertarian Party has pulled in 1.1% of the vote and the Green Party 0.2%.

If all hypothetical Green Party voters came from Biden’s total in Wisconsin at a rate similar to the total in Michigan, Biden’s Wisconsin margin would drop from 0.6% to 0.4%.

What would West’s impact have been? He fared best in Tennessee where he pulled in 0.3% of the vote (10,188 votes). He secured just over 60,000 votes in the 12 states in which he appeared on the ballot.

So, no, the Green Party and Kanye West wouldn’t have given Donald Trump a Wisconsin win. But they could have saved his campaign millions in a recount scenario.

Under Wisconsin law, a campaign can request a recount when the margin is less than one percent, but must pay for it if the margin exceeds 0.25 percent.

Trump said Wednesday morning his campaign would seek a recount in Wisconsin.

If you think stories like this are important, become a member of Urban Milwaukee and help support real, independent journalism. Plus you get some cool added benefits, all detailed here.

Categories: Politics

One thought on “8 Takeaways, How Biden Won Wisconsin”

  1. blurondo says:

    The most concerning item in this list is the first one. Recently, many Milwaukee area residents expended energy, time, dedication and money working to right very real wrongs that impact their lives every day.

    Those who hold elective office have the means to implement the changes that are still upper most on the minds of individuals who have been working day and night to influence change. Putting individuals into elective office who are advocates for those changes is a strategy that deserves the same effort.

    The next elections are: Spring Primary – Tuesday, February 16
    Spring Election – Tuesday, April 6

Leave a Reply

You must be an Urban Milwaukee member to leave a comment. Membership, which includes a host of perks, including an ad-free website, tickets to marquee events like Summerfest, the Wisconsin State Fair and the Florentine Opera, a better photo browser and access to members-only, behind-the-scenes tours, starts at $9/month. Learn more.

Join now and cancel anytime.

If you are an existing member, sign-in to leave a comment.

Have questions? Need to report an error? Contact Us