UW Students Oppose Free Speech Bill
Student groups say UW Regents policy already protects free speech, law not needed.
On Tuesday, Republican state lawmakers — including state Reps. Cody Horlacher, R-Mukwonago, Dave Murphy, R-Greenville, Assembly Speaker Robin Vos, R-Rochester and state Sen. Chris Kapenga, R-Delafield — began circulating a bill for cosponsorship that directs the Board of Regents to implement disciplinary measures for students and staff that engage in disorderly or violent actions against a speaker on campus.
“Campuses across the country have erupted in protest, including violent riots, as the growing debate over who has the right to speak threatens our nation’s First Amendment,” said the memo. “Invited speakers have been taunted, harassed, and even assaulted, leading many universities to cancel events. This is true for campuses here in Wisconsin where several UW System institutions including UW-Madison, UW-Oshkosh, UW-Stout, and UW-Stevens Point have had free speech related issues.”
The bill dictates that a student found to be “disruptive of expressive rights of others” at any time must be suspended for one semester. Those violating the policy a third time “must be expelled.”
Laura Downer, chair of the Associated Students of Madison, said UW-Madison worked with students on a 16-page policy on protest guidelines after the regents’ vote two years ago.
“It seems like a campus policy created by the Board of Regents or the campuses themselves is a better way to deal with the topic,” said Downer.
Vos’ spokeswoman Kit Beyer said while those policies already exist, the speakers want them in state statute. The current bill being circulated nullifies any existing policies on freedom of expression.
Downer said she understands Vos’ interest in cementing policy in statute, but students should have a more direct role.
“Students need to be involved in the process of creating the policy and of knowing exactly how administrators and faculty and staff are implementing policy because shared governance is also a state statute,” Downer said.
Connor Mathias, vice president of the UW-Milwaukee Student Association, said protecting all speakers who share ideas on campus is vitally important, but he said the Legislature doesn’t need to get involved.
“It’s kind of unnecessary for the state Legislature to mandate this,” said Mathias. “This is already a policy that was accepted by the UW regents and at this point, I just think it’s an unnecessary overstep by the state Legislature when we have great administrations and great dean of students offices on campuses that can deal with this by themselves.”
The lawmakers pushing the campus free speech bill are seeking cosponsors until Friday, Aug. 23, but the documents don’t say when it will be formally introduced.
Listen to the WPR report here.
UW Student Groups Say Bill Protecting Free Speech On Campus Unnecessary was originally published by Wisconsin Public Radio.
Free Speech bill is such a misnomer for this legislation, and a good example of how this false majority (having been elected in gerrymandered districts) try to force their minority thinking on the majority. Instead, the representatives might consider a bill to reinforce the precepts of both the Wisconsin and US Constitution, on a duty to represent citizens. When a legislator is sent to Madison to represent constituents, he/she represents all citizens, including those that disagree with them. Claiming privacy rights is a violation of this oath: having used privacy rights to hide gerrymandering, violate public’s right to know on official communications are just a few examples. Such alternative legislation should reinforce the rights of the press to report on misconduct and disclose penalties when legislators act as if they have privacy rights when representing voters. I’m sure the students would support this informed legislation. Vos your response?