Appeals Court Restores Some Lame Duck Laws
Leaving disagreement between parties over status of 82 Walker appointees.
A state appellate court has ruled in favor of the Republican-controlled state Legislature in an ongoing legal battle over December’s lame-duck session.
Republican legislative leaders were quick to herald the decision.
“Independent judges have put a Dane County ruling on hold that was based on politics, not the law,” said Assembly Speaker Robin Vos, R-Rochester, and state Senate Majority Leader Scott Fitzgerald, R-Juneau, in a prepared statement. “A judge should not violate the Legislature’s basic ability to convene when its duly elected members call a session day.”
The decision comes a day after another Dane County judge struck down some, but not all, of the laws passed during the lame-duck session.
The intersection of rulings means some of the lame-duck laws will go back on the books. Those include limits on the governor to change state work requirements for benefits like Medicaid and food stamps.
However, another law preventing the governor from withdrawing Wisconsin from a multi-state federal lawsuit against the Affordable Care Act remains on hold.
After the first Dane County ruling, Gov. Tony Evers officially rescinded 82 appointments made by former Gov. Scott Walker that were confirmed during the lame-duck session. Evers was in the process of naming his own appointees when the appellate court issued its stay.
The governor’s office contends the positions remain vacant until he names new appointees, but Misha Tseytlin, the lawyer for Republican lawmakers in both lame-duck cases, argues otherwise.
“Those people have a statutory right to their jobs because they were duly confirmed by the Senate in December 2018,” Tseytlin said via email. “The Governor’s hasty, ill-advised actions last week cannot possibly impact those legal rights.”
In a statement released after the appellate ruling, the governor’s office said Evers remains confident the courts will ultimately undo the entire lame-duck session.
“Republicans created this chaos and have doubled down on defending their illegal attack on our Constitution instead of working with the governor to move forward,” said Melissa Baldauff, Evers’ spokeswoman.
Republican lawmakers have said they plan to appeal the second state lame-duck case to a higher court as well.
The state cases move forward as two federal cases on the lame-duck session also play out.
A federal district judge ruled on one of the federal lawsuits in January, striking down restrictions on early voting that were also included in the lame-duck agenda. That case is pending appeal.
The second federal suit, filed by the Democratic Party of Wisconsin, argues the lame-duck laws violate the U.S. Constitution’s Guarantee Clause. That clause guarantees every state the right to a republican form of government. Arguments have yet to be heard in that case.
Listen to the WPR report here.
Appellate Court Sides With GOP, Restores Some Lame-Duck Laws was originally published by Wisconsin Public Radio.
- State Supreme Court Dismisses AG’s Lame-Duck Lawsuit - Ruth Conniff - Mar 25th, 2021
- Kaul Sues Legislature Over Lame Duck Laws - Melanie Conklin - Nov 24th, 2020
- AG Kaul Announces Legal Action to Allow DOJ to Again Enforce Wisconsin Laws Without Unconstitutional Legislative Interference - Josh Kaul - Nov 23rd, 2020
- Vos Thinks Lame-Duck Session Didn’t Go Far Enough - Melanie Conklin - Jul 31st, 2020
- The State of Politics: Court Rulings Against Evers Sow Confusion - Steven Walters - Jul 20th, 2020
- Court Tosses Dems’ Lame-Duck Suit - Laurel White - Jul 16th, 2020
- Op Ed: State High Court Nullifies 2018 Election - James Rowen - Jul 12th, 2020
- WI Supreme Court Upholds GOP Lame-Duck Laws - Laurel White - Jul 9th, 2020
- Gov. Evers Releases Statement on State Supreme Court’s Ruling on Lame Duck - Gov. Tony Evers - Jul 9th, 2020
- Lame Duck Supreme Court Upholds Lame Duck GOP Power Grab - State Sen. Chris Larson - Jul 9th, 2020
Read more about Lame Duck Laws here