Eyes on Milwaukee
“Bublr” Bike Share System Is Launched
The $3 million system is now installing 10 bike sharing stations and could expand to 100 stations and 1,000 bikes.
Get a daily rundown of the top stories on Urban Milwaukee
The $3 million system is now installing 10 bike sharing stations and could expand to 100 stations and 1,000 bikes. Back to the full article.
Photos - Page 2
Someone let these models in the pictures know there are quick release levers to raise the seats. They will enjoy their BUBLR ride a lot more with proper seat height 😉
@Jake Good point..
Dave,
That’s a fair point. And I do think that the stations make sense when you take the perspective of making it as easy as possible to move within downtown. It just looks like they have stations in all the commercial pockets of downtown and not in any of the major residential pockets. I realize that part of it is “so-and-so paid for a station, so they get one” and part of it is the very limited initial roll-out (i.e. I can see a couple places where I would like to see a station but wouldn’t be able to pick a station I’d remove). Very excited to see where they end up next year.
Regarding the comment: ya I dropped the ball on that one. The entire comment is an embarrassment really, my apologies that you spent time reading and responding to it :).
No problem..
Awesome news!! Definitely looking forward to it’s expansion so that it will really be useful to residents as well as downtown workers.
Not a fan of the name though….
Great news. I especially applaud the naming because it not only references something Wisconsin-specific but is also a nod to Milwaukee’s emerging “brand” as a city for water technology, research, etc. And of course, just like a regular bubbler, these bikes are a shared resource–something for everyone to use. Whoever thought of the name was pretty sharp.
I do want to point out that, according to the Bublr Bikes website, there will also be an annual membership options. For 2014, it will be prorated to $35, but I imagine it will be in the $65-80 range next year (which is typical for these systems…MN Nice Ride is $65, Divvy is $75). I use Divvy regularly as a Chicagoan, and I’ve gotta say the annual membership is the way to go here, and I think it will be in Milwaukee once the system expands a bit.
Good job, folks!
My daughter has been MD in emergency rooms. She was state champ bike racer. The injuries that they see the most is from bikes, so I hope that everyone has the sense to push safety. helmets, bright clothes, strobe lights, watch traffic. The life you save will be your own as you will barely dent a car.
Sheboygan jsut published the federal study on their grants from the feds and the bikes the last few years. Not very good. You can access at media trackers or Sheboygan.
We love cycling, have 4 bikes use them almost everyday of year when there is not ice on streets. All 7 in our family have raced. but, safety first. Many times the first collision with a car is your last.
Is this the study you are referring to?
Nonmotorized Transportation Pilot Program: 2014 Report (http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/bicycle_pedestrian/ntpp/2014_report/page01.cfm#Toc386019759)
Some of the results of the program in Sheboygan:
Safety: Despite large increases in nonmotorized transportation, the pilot communities collectively observed a 20 percent decline in the number of pedestrian fatalities and a 28.6 percent decline in the number of bicycle fatalities from 2002 to 2012. Similarly, over the same time period, three of the communities experienced declines in the number of pedestrian injuries and pedestrian injury rates declined between 17.9 percent and 55.1 percent in each of the four communities. Bicycle injuries increased in three of the four communities, but bicycling injury rates (incidents per number of trips) declined between 8.6 and 38.2 percent in each of the four communities.
Public Health: Based on the added bicycling trips observed just in 2013, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimates reduced economic cost of mortality of $46.3 million from bicycling in 2013. This does not include reduced economic cost of mortality from walking or benefits from reduced economic costs of morbidity, which are likely higher than mortality.
So, pedestrian and bicycle fatalities declined, while public health improved. So what do you mean when you say that the results are not very good?
@WCD Nothing wrong with safety.. But again biking in Milwaukee is safe, in fact it is paranoia over safety that makes bicyclists less safe as it scares away new riders and the number 1 way to make bicycling safer? Get more riders or the road. Again I’ll point to the 8.5 million trips and 14.7 million miles (number is even higher now) that normal people have biked on CitiBikes with 0 deaths, and only 25 accidents of note. Here’s some more fun facts. After the launch of bike-sharing in Minneapolis “the number of bicyclists killed in motor vehicle crashes in Minneapolis has actually declined.” Secretary LaHood. (this is when the system had 575,000 trips and 0 serious injuries)
http://www.streetsblog.org/2013/05/01/bike-share-has-a-great-safety-record-in-cities-more-dangerous-than-nyc/
Similar results in Boston and Washington D.C. as well..
If you access the article on Media Trackers you will see that after spending half a million of taxpayers money there was not any increase in bike usage.
Right cause Media Trackers is such a reputable source.
No increase in bike usage? Huh?
Mode Share Shift: An estimated 85.1 million vehicle miles traveled (VMT) were averted from increased nonmotorized trips between 2009 and 2013 relative to the 2007 baseline. The walking mode share increased 15.8 percent from 2007 to 2013, while the bicycling mode share increased 44 percent over the same period. This translates to 22.8 percent and 48.3 percent increase in the number of pedestrian and bicycle trips across the four communities.
So we have a decrease in pedestrian and bicycle fatalities, an improvement in overall public health, and an increase in the number of bicycle trips. How is that very bad?
@PMD Just to be clear the report your citing is the overall results of Nonmotorized Transportation Pilot Program (not just Sheboygan) correct? From what I read is that the program his increase walking and bicycling mode share and decreased injuries per trip… Yup.
Yes the results from 4 pilot programs including Sheboygan.
Is there an explanation for the name?
Bublr? Ah it is a reference to Milwaukeean’s calling drinking fountains Bubblers and the city’s ongoing water efforts (Reed Street Yards, Global Water Center). It connects a bit with our history and with the unique spelling to today’s modern tech world (think flickr).
I am using the Sheboygan figures, they are representative of Wisconsin and it’s weather. anything else is meaningless. Sheboygan is pretty much regular Wisconsin city. I enjoy cycling, encourage it, but safely, as it is true if you do your research about emergency rooms. Check it out everyone. We have PMD here throwing out all kinds of meaningless figures.
Fact is that it is highly unlikely that Wisconsin will dramatically increase bike usage cause of weather. May through Oct. is max for 90% of people, nuts like me ride all year round. The safety factor for people that have not ridden, in years, is a factor plus the kids are not riding that much, any more. We live next so school and I see adults coming by, heading for bike path, but few kids in the 10- 16 age group.
A closer look at the breakdown by community does reveal that bicycle usage in Sheboygan remained flat over a 6-year period. However, I still don’t see how that makes the program a failure. It hasn’t been marketed in the area and that changes this year, with support from the Chamber of Commerce. Walking increased by 85% during that period, which means there was an improvement in overall public health.
Also, As the study notes, “Sheboygan County, however, completed over $10 million of NTPP- and municipal-funded bicycle and pedestrian projects in 2013, which now provide better accessibility, safety, and visibility for bicycle users. The most highly anticipated and expensive project, a three mile multiuse path, is expected to show promising results once construction is completed in 2015.”
Safety also improved. While there was only 1 bike fatality in Sheboygan over a 10-year period, in 2003, bicycle injuries dramatically decreased in Sheboygan.
So you have more walking, better public health, improved safety, and an increase in accessibility and visibility for bicycle users. Plus after a marketing campaign you’ll probably get more bike usage as well. You have to engage in a lot of spin to claim the program is a failure for Sheboygan.
Again, safety improved in Sheboygan. And if you are that worried, you shouldn’t drive, ever, as you are far more likely to die behind the wheel of your car than on your bike.
@PMD Also I find it interesting many of the improvements were just finished last year and the trail isn’t even done yet so maybe media trackers it a bit premature.
No doubt Dave Reid. I think it would be wise to take anything from Media Trackers with a grain of salt.
Spending millions of dollars on left wing programs that accomplish nothing is standard for the govt.
But the accomplishments were listed. More walking, improved public health, far fewer biking accidents, enhanced accessibility and visibility for bikers. Are you intentionally ignoring those? Or are you claiming that those are not accomplishments?
So you love biking and claim to be an avid bicyclist, but a program designed to increase biking is “left wing?”
I don’t care for the name. The word “bubbler” means nothing to anyone from out of town, and would not obviously invoke thoughts of water.
Also, the spelling is so 10 years ago (“web 2.0”) and makes us look dated.
@Pete I guess to each their own.. Seems like a good fit to me…
Great start with Bublr! Love the name. Very Wisconsin! Would be great to expand stations to retail/gathering areas like North Ave, Downer St, Locust St, KK, etc. Maybe partner with Colectivo to locate by their cafés. If you keep the bike overnight, is it still $7 per day or is there a penalty for keeping it longer? How are bike maintained through the winter? Wouldn’t want rusty bikes in the fleet, plus not safe riding in the snow or ice. Comments?
@Alan You should only have a bike for 30 minutes at a time, otherwise yes you will be charged more. Bike-sharing is not really bike rental, where you might have a bike for hours and then bring it back. The $7 dollar day fee gets you unlimited checkouts for the day, but each checkout is limited to 30 mins. With Bike-sharing you use a bike to go from station A to station B (in 30 mins or less). Then check-in the bike, go have lunch, go to work, do some shopping.. whatever then when you want to go to your next stop checkout another bike an go to station C and check-in the bike there. Hence bike-sharing. I don’t believe he system will be operating during the winter. That said these style bikes would be perfectly fine to ride during the winter
@Pete
Eh, the name’s a name. I’m not in love with it but don’t think it’s bad either.
@Alon
As Dave mentioned the bikes are intended for point to point trips. In theory you never really have the bike checked out unless you are actively riding it. To provide a more concrete, real life example: in Chicago my place is a bit over a mile from the train station. When I get off the train I use my Divvy key to pick up a bike, then ride to the station nearest where I’m going (usually a block or two), return the bike and walk the rest of the way.
If you want to take a longer, more leisurely ride you can “dock surf” or ride for 25 minutes then check the bike in at a dock and immediately check it out again. The only catch is that, if there are people waiting for a bike, you should give your’s up and move to the back of the line. (A well managed system will rarely have docks that are empty or full but it can happen).
Regarding winter: I saw somewhere (I think on their site) that the expected season will be mid-March to mid-December, depending on the weather. The bikes can handle winter just fine, so shutting down has more to do with cutting operating costs when ridership drops than anything else. In Chicago Divvy operated all but a few days last year, during one particularly bad storm and the extreme cold periods. Even then it was less about biker safety than it was about the safety of the employees operating the system.
I got an email from Kevin (the one in charge of Bublr) saying that installation of the other 8 racks should begin August 18th. I personally can’t wait.
It will only take 2.5 years of everyday use for each bike to pay for itself. Hopefully those bikes will last that long.
This is tough area for bikes with weather and traffic.
The bublr lefty, hug a tree, take a pipe and make it a bike, is government waste and leftist disillusionment at its highest order. It might make sense for 3 cities and a few island nations, but for everybody else it’s just a money pit.