Wisconsin Center for Investigative Journalism

We Want Redistricting Reform!

Newspapers and good government groups across the state are pressing Republicans to adopt a non-partisan method of redistricting.

A remarkable advocacy campaign is happening in Wisconsin, involving media outlets, nonprofit groups and engaged citizens. They want to change — or at least discuss — how the state redraws voter boundaries .

Two mostly Democrat-backed bills, AB 185 and SB 163, would strip this task from politicians and give it to the Legislative Reference Bureau, a nonpartisan state service agency. This is similar to how redistricting is done in Iowa.

Wisconsin’s last redistricting, after the 2010 Census, was done in secret and cost taxpayers more than $2 million. Ruling Republicans strategically carved districts to maximize their electoral prospects, much as Democrats would had done had they been able.

Consider: In the fall 2012 elections, Republicans won five of the state’s eight congressional seats, six of 11 contested state Senate races, and 56 of 76 contested Assembly seats — despite getting fewer votes statewide than Democrats in all three categories.

This system for letting politicians pick their voters, rather than the other way around, has long been opposed by Common Cause in Wisconsin, the League of Women Voters of Wisconsin and Wisconsin Democracy Campaign.

Their cause got a boost in mid-August with the publication of editorials in papers including the Wisconsin State Journal, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, Green Bay Press-Gazette, Appleton Post-Crescent, Beloit Daily News, La Crosse Tribune, Chippewa Herald, Wisconsin Rapids Daily Tribune, Oshkosh Northwestern and Janesville Gazette.

The idea was hatched by Scott Milfred and David Haynes, the editorial page editors of, respectively, the Wisconsin State Journal and the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, along with Neil Heinen, editorial director of WISC-TV in Madison, which aired an editorial on the topic.

Milfred says the trio considered this an important issue that “didn’t look like it was going anywhere.” So they appealed to editorial boards across the state: “We thought more voices saying the same thing at the same time would be more likely to prompt action.”

Sen. Mary Lazich

Sen. Mary Lazich

The editorials called on state Sen. Mary Lazich, R-New Berlin, and Rep. Tyler August, R-Lake Geneva, who chair the committees where the redistricting bills languish, to allow public hearings.

“What are you and your Republican leaders afraid of?” chided the Janesville Gazette.

The bills are similar to ones that went nowhere in the past, including when Democrats controlled state government. GOP lawmakers including Lazich think the current bills should go nowhere too.

“Granting redistricting power to an unelected, appointed board would do little to remove the redistricting process from the political realm,” wrote Lazich in an column run by the State Journal and Journal Sentinel. “Rather, it would merely move the political maneuverings to an unaccountable board, beyond the reach of the electorate.”

In other words: If you don’t like what the party in power does to make it harder to vote its members out, all you have to do is vote them out.

The response from State Journal readers helped answer the Janesville Gazette’s question. All 13 letters that ran the following Sunday sided with the paper and against Sen. Lazich, with some noting the irony of Lazich using the banner of democracy to deny a public hearing.

Milfred says preference is given to “publishing reader views that disagree with our editorial board’s positions,” but in this case not a single such letter was received. In fact, the paper got more letters supporting its position than it had space to run.

Several editorials urged citizens to contact the offices of Sen. Lazich and Rep. August, but neither office would say what sort of response it received. An aide to Rep. August said the office only tracks constituent contacts, then failed to provide information on these.

Sen. Lazich, through staff, did not respond to requests for an interview or to say whether the reaction made her reconsider.

But Milfred is optimistic that a hearing will be held: “With that many voices across the state supporting a hearing, I’d be surprised if they’d just blow that off.”

Bill Lueders is the Money and Politics Project director at the Wisconsin Center for Investigative Journalism (www.WisconsinWatch.org). The project, a partnership of the Center and MapLight, is supported by The Joyce Foundation.

 The Center collaborates with Wisconsin Public Radio, Wisconsin Public Television, other news media and the UW-Madison School of Journalism and Mass Communication. All works created, published, posted or disseminated by the Center do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of UW-Madison or any of its affiliates.

6 thoughts on “We Want Redistricting Reform!”

  1. Scott says:

    Liberals always want something

  2. Scott says:

    When do the recalls start up again?

  3. Bruce Thompson says:

    Perhaps democracy? Actually at some point Democrats will return to power and then Republicans will wish they supported this when they had a chance.

  4. Andy says:

    All this would do is move the politics to a level that’s less controlled by the voter… I’d assume this board is appointed by politicians… so the more politicians voted in by a party, the more members they’d appoint to the board. This just means the same things would take place, but over a longer period of time and make it more difficult to undo.

    What about a system with some checks and balances? Perhaps a system where both parts of the state government AND judicial approval or appointed board must approve it? Something to add the layers of approval to get it passed.

  5. e says:

    “All this would do is move the politics to a level that’s less controlled by the voter… ”

    False. Just look at Iowa, as referenced in the article. They have 4 districts that vary by up to 84 people, tilt no more than a few points in either partisan direction, and follow natural county lines. Only neutral criteria are used (e.g., it doesn’t matter if the map pits 2 incumbents against each other). The proposed maps receive large bipartisan support because they are fair and unbiased. It is a far superior system that is fair to voters, despite your attempted scare tactics

  6. Kyle says:

    Andy – State government and judicial approval? Isn’t the the system we already have, where one side draws the new districts, and the other side sues to stop them? Or are you proposing putting that role in an official capacity (which would probably still prompt a round of lawsuits)?

Leave a Reply

You must be an Urban Milwaukee member to leave a comment. Membership, which includes a host of perks, including an ad-free website, tickets to marquee events like Summerfest, the Wisconsin State Fair and the Florentine Opera, a better photo browser and access to members-only, behind-the-scenes tours, starts at $9/month. Learn more.

Join now and cancel anytime.

If you are an existing member, sign-in to leave a comment.

Have questions? Need to report an error? Contact Us