Alchemist’s “Fool for Love”; too cool?

By - Jun 7th, 2011 02:20 am
Get a daily rundown of the top stories on Urban Milwaukee

The object of desire: Bethany Ligocki Peters as May.

A sultry Friday night provided the perfect ambiance for Sam Shepard’s Fool for Love, at the Alchemist Theatre.  This 1983 Western of words about conflicted relationships plays out in a seedy motel on the edge of the Mohave Desert.

Bo Johnson directed and designed the scenery, a beat-up motel room. Its burnt umber walls, patched at about where a foot would kick through, remind us of those monotonous Western landscapes. The motel door periodically opens to total darkness and repeatedly slams to punctuate the desperate dialogue.

Eddie (Alex Grindeland) and May (Bethany Ligocki Peters) are long term lovers. They’re also half-brother and sister. But there’s a new suitor, Martin (Derek Burton Morris).

After an extended separation, Eddie returns from a rodeo tour with his truck and horses. He’s intent on rekindling his relationship with May. But it’s now as desiccated as the parched desert. He brings in a shotgun with very long double barrels, and a rope he for lassoing the bedposts. He’s the vestige of all-American, Western virtue: a truck driving, gun-totting, lasso throwing, straight tequila drinking cowboy in a dull plaid shirt with no place else to go but to a crumby motel room, to make a life with his half-sister.

There’s an allusion to a countess with whom Eddie has had a fleeting affair. Unseen but for a flash of headlights on the room’s window, she happens by and shoots out Eddie’s windshield. Enter Martin, May’s date. He’s a big, gentle guy who can’t decide what movie he’ll take May to because he doesn’t know what she wants to see. His interaction with his competitor barely rises beyond the rational. That bottle of tequila smooths things out as the two men commiserate while their mutual object of desire eavesdrops from the bathroom. They share May as a point of convergence, but ultimately, she’ll make a choice.

Jeff Ircink plays the Old Man, the pair’s father, a ghost who interjects along the way from his vantage point on an old porch rocker. He fills in details of the strange family background that led to this awkward take on sibling rivalry.

The play’s Virginia Woolf-like premise and powerful tension are grueling, but even so, this cast seems under-wrought. Ligocki Peters’ May maintains a singular, disconnected mode. As the focal point of two lovers, she seems aloof. She’s young and attractive, and her big monologue defines a passionate past with Eddie. With the big bed in the motel room, the sexual tension should be palpable. It isn’t. Maybe that’s the point.

Grindeland and Morris deliver their characters with conviction. Their relationship actually develops more depth than either has with May.  But, despite what amounts to male bonding, their chemistry is muted as well. And yet…

The 60-minute piece ends suddenly. The discomfort it evokes endures somewhat longer.

Fool for Love runs at 7:30 p.m. Fridays and Saturdays through June 18, with a Sunday matinee at 4 p.m. on June 12. Tickets are $15 if purchased online or $17 at the door.

Cowboy fool (Alex Grindeland) drinks with the Old Man’s ghost (Jeff Ircink).

Categories: Theater

0 thoughts on “Alchemist’s “Fool for Love”; too cool?”

  1. Anonymous says:

    Sir,
    As a reviewer, your reactions, opinions, and perspectives regarding a production are more than welcome. That is your job after all. But I would also suggest that, in the future, you think twice about giving away plot points that should come as a surprise to audiences seeing the show. Part of what makes this show interesting to an audience is the shock of certain information as it is revealed. Giving that information away makes a show that you already feel is “muted” even more so to anyone who reads this review before they see the show. A plot synopsis is not really necessary to a worthwhile review.
    Thanks,
    Bo Johnson

  2. Anonymous says:

    If this guy had written a review of Fight Club he would have said, “Edward Norton and Brad Pitt, who it turns out are actually the same person, start clubs for fighting across the nation.”

    Thanks for giving away the entire plot of the play, twisted reveals and all, in what is supposed to be a review.

  3. Anonymous says:

    ditto bo. ditto the review reviewer.

  4. Anonymous says:

    Bo, the play is decades old and very well known. It’s been made into a movie. Who doesn’t know the plot already? — Strini

  5. Anonymous says:

    no one that i invited to the show thus far knew the plot, tom.

Leave a Reply

You must be an Urban Milwaukee member to leave a comment. Membership, which includes a host of perks, including an ad-free website, tickets to marquee events like Summerfest, the Wisconsin State Fair and the Florentine Opera, a better photo browser and access to members-only, behind-the-scenes tours, starts at $9/month. Learn more.

Join now and cancel anytime.

If you are an existing member, sign-in to leave a comment.

Have questions? Need to report an error? Contact Us