Transportation Projects Commission takes action on Major Highway Projects
TPC recommends Major Highway Project candidates be added to the list for construction, approves cancellation of two current projects.
County Line Road Interchange – split diamond hybrid option 2
Wisconsin’s Transportation Projects Commission (TPC) today recommended to the Legislature and Governor that two Major Highway Project candidates be enumerated or added to the list for construction in the next state budget including a 14-mile section of I-43 in Milwaukee and Ozaukee counties, and a 7.5-mile segment of I-94 in St. Croix County. A third project, a 4.4-mile section of WIS 50 in Kenosha County, received immediate approval as a Major Highway Project via the TPC’s statutory authority related to high-cost rehabilitation projects (State Statute 84.013(1)(a)2m).
“Strategic investments in our comprehensive transportation system are essential for the safe and efficient movement of people to jobs and commerce to markets,” said Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker who chairs the 15-member TPC. “The Major Highway Projects being recommended for construction have undergone years of careful analysis, require significant upgrades to address aging infrastructure, traffic congestion and safety concerns, and hold tremendous potential to generate economic activity.” Major Highway Project candidates acted on include:
- I-43 in Milwaukee and Ozaukee counties. Constructed in the mid-1950’s and 60’s, this 14-mile segment of I-43 between Silver Spring Drive and WIS 60 is part of a state and federally-designated long truck route and serves as an economic gateway to Green Bay, Milwaukee and beyond. Along with pavements that have exceeded their life expectancy, numerous bridges, curves and ramps no longer meet design standards, and cannot accommodate current and projected traffic volumes. Current traffic volume reaches up to 84,000 vehicles daily, and is expected to increase to up to 101,000 vehicles in 20 years. About 40 percent of the corridor has crash rates exceeding the statewide average for similar roadways. Proposed improvements include reconstructing the corridor with three travel lanes in each direction, replacing the partial interchange at County Line Road with a full-access interchange, and constructing a new interchange at Highland Road. The remaining interchanges and most of the bridges within the corridor would be rebuilt. The estimated cost is $448 million.
- I-94 in St. Croix County. Constructed in the late 1950’s, this 7.5-mile segment of I-94 between US 12 and WIS 65 is a federally-designated truck route that serves as a major commuter and commerce link between the Twin Cities and St. Croix County. Pavement and bridge deficiencies along the segment require full redesign and reconstruction. Current traffic along the corridor reaches up to 46,400 vehicles daily, and is expected to increase to up to 69,100 vehicles in 20 years. About 50 percent of the corridor has crash rates exceeding the statewide average for similar roadways. Proposed improvements include reconstruction of the existing freeway and addition of a third lane in each direction to create a six-lane divided highway between US 12 and WIS 65. The estimated cost is $129 million.
- WIS 50 in Kenosha County. This 4.4-mile segment of WIS 50 between I-94 and 43rd Avenue in Kenosha is an oversized, overweight truck route that also serves a variety of local and regional commuters. Bridges that carry WIS 50 traffic over two railways and 77th Avenue are narrow, have undergone numerous repairs and require replacement. Current traffic along the corridor reaches up to 36,700 vehicles daily, and is expected to increase to up to 46,800 vehicles in 20 years. About 70 percent of the corridor has crash rates exceeding the statewide average for similar roadways. Proposed improvements include reconstruction of the existing four-lane highway and addition of a third lane in each direction to create a six-lane facility between the Interstate and 57th Avenue. The estimated cost is $93 million.
Also Monday, the TPC:
- Cancelled the WIS 81/WIS 213 Beloit Bypass study project in Rock County. Both the Illinois and Wisconsin DOT’s recommended cancellation of the study due to a lack of local support. The cost-to-complete estimate is $9.3 million.
- Cancelled the WIS 38 (County K to Oakwood Road) Major Highway Project in Milwaukee and Racine counties. WisDOT has suspended work on the project due largely to a lack of local consensus on a preferred alignment. The cost-to-complete estimate is $124 million.
- Removed the US 14 Viroqua – Westby Major Highway Project in Vernon County from the Major Highway Program because the project is considered complete. In 2011, construction was completed on a four-lane highway between the communities. The original project scope also called for two-lane bypasses of Viroqua and Westby, however recent traffic projections show that construction of the bypasses is not needed at this time. The cost-to-complete estimate is $42.4 million.
Major Highway Project candidates undergo an extensive, statutorily-set evaluation that considers a project’s potential to enhance economic development, relieve traffic congestion, improve safety and achieve community objectives while minimizing environmental impacts. To move forward, candidate projects must undergo an environmental review process. State law prohibits the TPC from recommending major highway projects unless funding is sufficient to begin construction within six years.
The TPC is a public/private commission that includes the Governor, five state senators, five Assembly representatives and three citizen members who review, approve, and make recommendations regarding Major Highway Projects in Wisconsin. The full Legislature and Governor will make final decisions on the I-43 and I-94 recommendations as part of the 2015 – 2017 biennial state budget.
The 2011 – 13 state budget revised the definition of a Major Highway Project as a project that has a total cost of over $30 million and involves at least one of the following: constructs a new highway route of 2.5 miles or more in length; reconstructs or reconditions an existing highway by either relocating 2.5 miles or more of the existing highway or adding one or more lanes five miles or more in length to an existing highway; improves to freeway standards 10 miles or more of an existing divided highway having two or more lanes in either direction. State law (84.013(1)(a)2m) also specifies that any project with a total cost of over $75 million can also qualify as a Major Highway Project. More information about Major Highway Projects in Wisconsin can be found on the WisDOT website at: www.dot.wisconsin.gov/projects/state/sixyear/major.htm.
NOTE: This press release was submitted to Urban Milwaukee and was not written by an Urban Milwaukee writer. While it is believed to be reliable, Urban Milwaukee does not guarantee its accuracy or completeness.
Mentioned in This Press Release
Recent Press Releases by Wisconsin Department of Transportation
Move over, slow down to keep emergency roadside workers safe
Nov 18th, 2024 by Wisconsin Department of TransportationAnnual Crash Responder Safety Week reminds drivers to do their part to protect first responders
Is it me, or do we need to push the county board to outlaw the expansion or building of new expressway? Or to pass a resolution demanding a look at freeway removal within 50 years in Milwaukee. Others are doing it, why can’t we?
It’s just you.
Seriously though, as much as we love a dense, vibrant urban core that provides an extensive transit system we still need to provide an efficient system. We’ll need it for freight traffic along with access to all the suburbanites who will *never* move into the city but will make the trip for entertainment or work provided the trip is easy and relatively convenient.
I agree that we must maintain existing roadways for efficient freight traffic, but adding lanes is a waste of a ton of money. It does not reduce traffic or improve safety. $448 million is a hell of a lot of money.
PMD, I was skeptical too… especially with the Marquette interchange that seems, to me anyway, to be a poor design. However after looking at the numbers, traffic accidents were cut just about in half. I still think they could have designed it better. That said though, I can’t say it’s not somewhat safer now.
However, I’m totally on board with not adding lanes for most of these projects. Look at the traffic numbers. Maybe we can give them a pass for I-43 north of Milwaukee because of the daily and extensive backups there (and 6 digit daily traffic numbers), but why do we need a 6 lane highway in St. Croix and Kenosha where the traffic counts are half or a third of the level of I-43?? Same with I-90 south of Madison. The traffic numbers just don’t support a need to waste all that money.
Good points Andy regarding areas with low traffic counts. And when you also consider that adding lanes does not reduce traffic (and according to some studies doesn’t improve safety either), and that people have been driving less each year for 10 or 20 years now, it just doesn’t seem fiscally sound to spend this kind of money here.