Wisconsin Public Radio

Wisconsin Supreme Court To Hear Case About Firing Election Chief

The court will weigh in on whether it was illegal for Republican lawmakers to vote to fire Meagan Wolfe.

By , Wisconsin Public Radio - Sep 12th, 2024 07:00 pm
Wisconsin Elections Commission Administrator Meagan Wolfe, left, is seen during a September 2018 meeting of the Elections Commission with then-Commissioner Dean Knudson. Emily Hamer/Wisconsin Watch

Wisconsin Elections Commission Administrator Meagan Wolfe, left, is seen during a September 2018 meeting of the Elections Commission with then-Commissioner Dean Knudson. Emily Hamer/Wisconsin Watch

The Wisconsin Supreme Court announced Wednesday that it will take up a case determining whether the state’s nonpartisan chief elections officer can stay in her role.

The case is part of a saga that extends back more than a year to when the term of Meagan Wolfe, administrator of the Wisconsin Elections Commission, expired last summer. She stayed on in a holdover position in a move backed by Democratic Attorney General Josh Kaul.

After Republicans in the state Legislature attempted to oust her by moving her name through an official nomination process and voting against her, Kaul called the whole process illegitimate and called on state courts to affirm that.

The state high court now says it will weigh in on the matter. Its order does not offer a timeline, including a date for oral arguments, and comes less than eight weeks out from a presidential election in which Wisconsin is expected to play a decisive role.

The winding battle to remove Wolfe took place over the course of several months last year, and was fueled by conspiracy theories leveled against Wolfe, who has served in the administrative position since 2019 and oversaw the 2020 presidential election. That election season faced unprecedented changes due to the Covid-19 pandemic, and later saw unprecedented challenges from the losing candidate, former President Donald Trump, and his allies.

Wolfe’s term expired on July 1 of last year. State legal officials, including Kaul, say if she does not step down she may remain in that role indefinitely. They cite a legal precedent set by a conservative court regarding a Republican governor’s appointee.

That persisted even as Republicans in the state Legislature mounted an effort to fire her, with some arguing she had lost the faith of the voting public. Last September, following a standard confirmation process that Democrats called illegitimate, Republicans who control the state Senate voted to fire her.

Following that Senate vote, Wolfe said she would continue working unless and until a court told her not to. Kaul filed suit asking for that court weigh in.

The suit names as defendants Republican legislative leaders Senate Majority Leader Devin LeMahieu, Assembly Speaker Robin Vos and Senate President Chris Kapenga.

In a lower court ruling in January, Dane County Circuit Court Judge Ann Peacock upheld Kaul’s argument, saying Wolfe may continue to work as a holdover and the Senate vote did not have any effect.

In the meantime, a breakout group of Republicans in the Assembly moved to impeach her, but faced headwinds from their own party leadership, who argued Wolfe should step down but they were moving on from the issue.

Wolfe’s name was also brought up by critics of Vos when they mounted a series of failed recall attempts on his Assembly seat. Some of those involved had previously criticized him for not supporting the decertification of the 2020 election, arguments for which were largely based on disproven claims of election fraud.

President Joe Biden narrowly won Wisconsin in 2020 by about 21,000 votes — an outcome that has been upheld by multiple investigations and lawsuits.

November’s election in battleground Wisconsin is expected to be similarly close, with presidential races in the state often decided by less than a percentage point. Elections experts have cautioned that, with state election law in constant flux, Wisconsin can expect to see challenges to its results once again.

The Wolfe case order came in the same week as the state supreme court heard oral arguments in two other elections-related cases, one which could determine whether mobile voting sites are allowed.

WPR did not receive immediate responses to requests for comment from LeMahieu, Vos, Kapenga and the Wisconsin Elections Commission.

Wisconsin Supreme Court to hear case about election chief’s future was originally published by Wisconsin Public Radio.

If you think stories like this are important, become a member of Urban Milwaukee and help support real, independent journalism. Plus you get some cool added benefits.

Comments

  1. TosaGramps1315 says:

    How is this still going on? Republicans continue to try to reverse engineer their baseless, evidence-free charges of voter fraud and election administration improprieties, now claiming that the voting public has lost faith in Meghan Wolfe.
    I will go out on a limb and predict a 3-2 decision by the State Supreme Court in favor of Ms. Wolfe keeping her job, and that decision will come well after the November election.
    Then it is anyone’s guess whether or not these GOP cockroaches decide to amp it up and take this silly matter to the US Supreme Court.

  2. Dmshrout says:

    Agree with Tosagramps. This foolishness has truly gone on far too long. Hopefully Dems will retake Assembly or Senate and give this poor puppy a rest.

Leave a Reply

You must be an Urban Milwaukee member to leave a comment. Membership, which includes a host of perks, including an ad-free website, tickets to marquee events like Summerfest, the Wisconsin State Fair and the Florentine Opera, a better photo browser and access to members-only, behind-the-scenes tours, starts at $9/month. Learn more.

Join now and cancel anytime.

If you are an existing member, sign-in to leave a comment.

Have questions? Need to report an error? Contact Us