Report Calls For Criminally Charging State’s Fake Electors
Democracy protection group, Just Security, says 10 Republicans committed felonies.
In the weeks after President Joe Biden won the 2020 election, as Trump’s campaign and Republicans across Wisconsin and the country attempted to find every legal avenue and back alley to overturn the results, the 10 Republicans met in secret on the same day that Wisconsin’s electoral college voters are statutorily required to meet and cast their votes.
[inarticlad]While the actually elected voters met in public in a meeting broadcast on Wisconsin Eye, the false electors met secretly in the state Capitol and cast votes for Trump. A key point made by the report is that the fake electors cast their ballots hours after the state Supreme Court, in a 4-3 decision, ended the Trump campaign’s lawsuit to have thousands of absentee ballots cast in Dane and Milwaukee counties tossed out.
The report states that the false electors knew of the court’s decision and knew that this was the end of the line for Trump’s efforts to change the results. Because there was no longer a possibility of Trump being declared the winner in Wisconsin, the report states the electors’ actions possibly constituted forgery, falsely assuming to act as a public officer, misconduct in public office, simulating legal process as well as conspiracy and party to a crime.
“By that point, the Trump team had exhausted all available legal mechanisms for challenging the outcome within the state judicial system, including the Wisconsin Supreme Court,” states the report, written by Gretchen Knaut, the research director of a Washington D.C.-based voting rights law firm, and Shan Wu, a former federal prosecutor. “Wisconsin voters and courts alike had definitively spoken in favor of the Biden electors. Yet the 10 would-be Trump electors persisted in gathering and submitting their own votes, thereby attempting to usurp the will of the people, the judiciary, and the foundations of U.S. democracy itself.”
The report outlines all the elements present to make the case for charging each felony and breaks down what the electors’ defense would look like and how it could be taken apart.
“Only by holding the ten individuals in Wisconsin and their co-conspirators accountable for their actions can we hope to repair the damage they inflicted, and to discourage others from following in their footsteps,” the report states.
A number of voting rights advocates in Wisconsin have pressed to have the false electors held accountable since taking their votes, yet so far no action has been taken. The electors, Carol Brunner, Mary Buestrin, Darryl Carlson, Bill Feehan, Scott Grabins, Andrew Hitt, Kathy Kiernan, Kelly Ruh, Robert Spindell and Pam Travis have not faced any consequences, and in some cases have continued to hold positions of power within the state party and the government.
The voting rights focused legal outfit, Law Forward, has been one of the few organizations within the state pushing for the electors to be held accountable. In 2021, the firm filed a complaint with the Wisconsin Elections Commission alleging that the false votes constituted election fraud.
In March, the commission unanimously voted to dismiss the complaint. Spindell, a Republican-appointed member of the commission, was able to cast a vote on the issue that involved his own actions.
“We respectfully suggest that it is within the duties of your office to promptly investigate and prosecute to the fullest extent of the law the apparently felonious acts described here,” attorneys Jeff Mandell and Mel Barnes wrote. “What is most important is that the unbridled and unlawful attacks perpetrated … against the fundamental precepts of American democracy, both here in Wisconsin and more broadly, never recur. Unfortunately, developments over the past year clearly establish that the only way to ensure that these attacks do not recur — or worse, become a routine part of our presidential election cycle — is to hold the fraudulent electors and anyone else responsible for their conduct accountable. We are determined to see that happen.”
In May, Law Forward and Georgetown University Law Center’s Institute for Constitutional Advocacy and Protection, filed a civil lawsuit in Dane County against the false electors arguing that a court should declare they engaged in a civil conspiracy and be held responsible for the damages their actions caused. In June, that lawsuit was moved to U.S. District Court where it is currently pending.
Calls have also been made for Wisconsin’s Democratic Attorney General Josh Kaul and the U.S. Department of Justice to investigate the false electors, but so far no action has been taken. The electors have sparked the interest of the investigators working for the congressional committee reviewing the events that led to the Jan. 6 attack. Earlier this year, Hitt, one of the electors who was at the time the chairman of the state Republican party, was subpoenaed by the committee.
Report argues for criminal charges against Wisconsin’s fraudulent electors was originally published by the Wisconsin Examiner.
More about the 2020 General Election
- Senator Agard Statement on Senator Knodl’s Continued Relitigation of the 2020 Presidential Election - State Sen. Melissa Agard, Senate Democratic Leader - Aug 29th, 2023
- Report Calls For Criminally Charging State’s Fake Electors - Henry Redman - Dec 19th, 2022
- Vos Withdraws Subpoenas, Ends Gableman Probe - Henry Redman - Aug 30th, 2022
- Judge Blasts Gableman Probe, Deleted Records - Henry Redman - Aug 17th, 2022
- Vos Fires Gableman, Ends Election Probe - Shawn Johnson - Aug 14th, 2022
- Judge Orders Gableman To Pay $163,000 In Legal Fees - Rich Kremer - Aug 2nd, 2022
- Prosecute 2020 Fake Electors, Advocates Demand - Erik Gunn - Aug 1st, 2022
- Trump Calls For Nullification of Wisconsin’s 2020 Election - Henry Redman - Jul 12th, 2022
- Legal Fight Over Gableman Probe Keeps Growing - Shawn Johnson - Jun 30th, 2022
- Back In the News: Fake Elector Scheme Dogs Ron Johnson - Bruce Murphy - Jun 28th, 2022
Read more about 2020 General Election here
More about the Chaos at the Capitol
- Hayward, WI Man Sentenced for Jan. 6 Attack - Frank Zufall - Jul 17th, 2024
- Police Officer Who Survived Jan. 6 Has a Warning for America - Erik Gunn - Apr 10th, 2024
- 3 Years After Jan. 6 Insurrection Where Do Wisconsin Cases Stand? - Sarah Lehr - Jan 7th, 2024
- Wisconsin Man Arrested for Assaulting Law Enforcement During Jan. 6 Capitol Breach - U.S. Department of Justice - Sep 7th, 2023
- State’s Top Elections Official Interviewed By Jan. 6 Investigators - Anya van Wagtendonk - Jul 19th, 2023
- Op Ed: Kaul Should Charge Ron Johnson, 10 Fake Electors - Matt Rothschild - Jan 8th, 2023
- WisDems Chair Ben Wikler Statement on the Anniversary of 1/6 - Democratic Party of Wisconsin - Jan 6th, 2023
- Congresswoman Gwen Moore Statement on Two-Year Anniversary of January 6th - U.S. Rep. Gwen Moore - Jan 6th, 2023
- Wisconsin GOP Chair Expressed Concern About Fake Electors Plan, Then Joined In - Shawn Johnson - Dec 23rd, 2022
- Report Calls For Criminally Charging State’s Fake Electors - Henry Redman - Dec 19th, 2022
Read more about Chaos at the Capitol here
Traitors every one of them.
Yes, they do need to be charged.
They committed treason.
Republicans are always worried about “voter fraud”. Aren’t these fake electors just that??
rCons consist of both the self-loathing and the self-aggrandizing, at once.
Not to charge these individuals would be tantamount to excusing this form of political terrorism. Theirs was a conscious choice aimed at corrupting our democratic proceedings and must be penalized.
Imagine letting a criminal vote on whether they should be held accountable for their crimes. That’s what happened here and nobody seems to care. Unbelievable. What are the Attorney General and the District Attorney of Dane County afraid of? And there are more than these ten to be held to account. Fitzgerald for organizing the meeting, Johnson for his role in the plot, and the “attorneys” advising them. As Gerry Broderick says, doing nothing is sanctioning a crime that could have amounted to an overthrow of the government. What could be more important? Jaywalking? Disorderly conduct? Tossing trash in the park?