Graham Kilmer
MKE County

Parking Fees in Parks Has Support From Neighborhood Association

County seeking more revenue. Story Hill Neighborhood Association supports some fees.

By - Sep 2nd, 2026 07:13 pm
Doyne Park. Photo taken Aug. 21, 2022 by Dave Reid.

Doyne Park. Photo taken Aug. 21, 2022 by Dave Reid.

Milwaukee County Parks‘ proposal to charge for parking in a limited number of high-traffic areas is receiving tentative support from one neighborhood association that would be affected by the plan.

Based on feedback collected at public meetings and through social media, the Story Hill Neighborhood Association formally expressed support for the pilot program, provided it would not introduce paid parking along Story Parkway.

Story Hill is one of two areas where Parks is contemplating introducing paid parking. The department is also proposing parking fees for high-traffic parking spots along the lakefront around Bradford BeachMcKinley Marina and Veterans Park.

Paid parking would create a new revenue source for park improvements and maintaining existing parking infrastructure, which the department has spent $23 million maintaining since 2018, according to Parks. Shifting a greater share of the burden for maintaining this infrastructure and using revenue to improve other transportation options, such as nearby bicycle trails, would also advance the department’s long-term goals for land use and transportation infrastructure, Deputy Director James Tarantino previously told Urban Milwaukee. Revenue estimates suggest the program could generate $671,344 in net income in 2027.

The Story Hill Neighborhood Association expressed support for Parks implementing paid parking in the Doyne Park parking lot and along Mitchell Boulevard, but not along Story Parkway.

The parkway cuts between a residential neighborhood and American Family Field parking lots. Game-day traffic has been a nuisance for residents in the past. Recently, parking was banned along the parkway, and the paid parking plan would allow the traffic to return.

Neighborhood residents understand the parks need more funding and support the department’s efforts to generate more revenue, but were nearly unanimous in opposing paid parking along Story Parkway, according to a statement from the neighborhood association.

“Residents’ concerns focus on traffic and pedestrian safety, disruption to established game-day traffic management, enforcement challenges, and the overall suitability of a residential parkway for paid event parking,” Neighborhood Association President John Gleason said in an email to Urban Milwaukee. “Our position is not opposition to County revenue generation. We recognize the financial challenges facing Milwaukee County Parks and support efforts to generate revenue where it can be done responsibly. We simply believe Story Parkway is the wrong location for this proposal.”

Parks still needs approval from the Milwaukee County Board for the proposals and the exact details of the program are not yet set in stone. “We are open to finding the right balance as we set up the paid parking program so this is valuable feedback,” Tarantino said of the neighborhood association’s position.

Milwaukee County is projecting a $50.9 million budget gap in 2027, according to projections from the Office of the Comptroller. The parks system has an estimated $500 million backlog of infrastructure needs. Without a new source of revenue, in this case paid parking, the parks department anticipates cutting approximately $887,000 in 2027, leading to the closure of two additional pools, 15 splash pads and wading pools, a $50,000 cut to traffic safety spending and a $300,000 cut to the department’s general budget.

Previous parking fee proposals have been met with strong pushback from the public. In 2018, then county executive Chris Abele included a parking fee plan in his proposed budget. The plan was dropped after facing criticism that parking fees would limit access to public parks.

If you think stories like this are important, become a member of Urban Milwaukee and help support real, independent journalism. Plus you get some cool added benefits.

Categories: MKE County, Parks, Politics

Comments

  1. gerrybroderick says:

    This proposal presents the classic slippery slope. Our parks are and should continue to be open and free to all. A simpler solution to Story Hill’s parking dilemma might be to restrict parking during specific time’s, while working with the County Transit System to provide stadium access through additional bus service.

  2. mgmw2424 says:

    Totally opposed to charging for parking in any park or along the lake. Find the budget shortfall money by making cuts in the overly bloated Safety Building project.

  3. Ludwig says:

    I have to agree with the “slippery slope” scenario. For example, South Shore Park, Pavilion, Walking/Bike Path & Beach need to be accessible to all. Hopefully people won’t start saying, “Not In My Neighborhood,” when it comes to sharing our County Park System. With everything putting more & more pressure on people’s income the lakefront & parks are some of the last free places for escaping the heat, providing kids a place to play and for families to socializing in a green space. Our city used to be one of the highest rated cities in the country for it parks. We need them. We must make cuts someplace else. The plan to draw more people into the city via different road plans etc. is what some people desire but without green space it’s going to be a pretty grim place to move to.

  4. John Horgan says:

    The city & county should not give away parking for free. The roads and lots require maintenance. However…

    1. How will the meters be enforced? By whom? Cost? Will enforcement costs exceeed revenue?

    2. What will prevent a future board from raising costs of meters and expanding the number of meters and locations of meters?

  5. gerrybroderick says:

    JH, In regard to our parks, you cannot ‘give away’ parking for free. Parking fees have never existed in our park system . You’re suggesting imposing a new fee, as former County Executive Abele did. And he received a huge public backlash. We are Milwaukee, not Chicago. We don’t do things like destroy our beautiful lakefront with an expressway. And we don’t, and won’t, charge for parking in our parks. If more revenue is required for road maintenance a user fee levied by MVD would be more appropriate.

  6. Lizwah says:

    Why isn’t the County enforcing already existing laws regarding parking enforcement for unauthorized driving and parking in prohibited areas of our parks? Start charging the people who blatantly violate the rules by driving over curbs to park on the turf next to the picnic areas where it is clearly illegal to do so.

Leave a Reply

You must be an Urban Milwaukee member to leave a comment. Membership, which includes a host of perks, including an ad-free website, tickets to marquee events like Summerfest, the Wisconsin State Fair and the Florentine Opera, a better photo browser and access to members-only, behind-the-scenes tours, starts at $9/month. Learn more.

Join now and cancel anytime.

If you are an existing member, sign-in to leave a comment.

Have questions? Need to report an error? Contact Us