Foxconn, We Energies Building Solar Farm at Factory Campus
2,000-panel installation will produce enough electricity to power 300 homes.
A roughly 2,000-panel solar project could be coming to Foxconn Technology Group’s property in Mount Pleasant.
We Energies and Foxconn announced a new partnership Thursday. The companies plan to seek approval from the village of Mount Pleasant and Racine County to move forward with the solar project, which they say will generate enough energy to power about 300 homes.
We Energies spokesperson Brendan Conway could not disclose the cost of the project, but said it will not impact customer rates.
According to the utility, the solar project is expected to generate enough energy to offset over 1,200 metric tons of carbon dioxide emissions each year. That’s equivalent to taking 260 cars off the road or planting 20,000 trees.
Conway said the project will help WEC Energy Group meet its goals of reducing carbon emissions by 80 percent by the end of 2030 and to have net-zero carbon emissions by 2050.
“Projects like this make a big difference in reducing emissions,” he said.
Conway said energy generated by the system will feed the grid but will be purchased by Foxconn through We Energies’ Energy For Tomorrow program.
“That purchase … will basically offset the cost of the project,” he said.
We Energies will lease land on the Mount Pleasant campus from Foxconn, as well as install, own and maintain the solar panels, Conway said. The project will be built on 22 acres around a retention pond on land that cannot be used for development and would otherwise sit empty.
“It’s not something that can be used for manufacturing or other industrial uses,” he said. “We’re basically taking this land that can’t be really used for anything else (and) we’re putting solar panels on it.”
Panels used in the project will be a mix of “single-axis tracking panels” and “fixed-tilt panels.” Conway said tracking panels tilt in the direction of the sun to maximize energy production, while fixed tilt panels do not move with the sun.
“We’re really able to use different technologies (and) build it into an area that can’t really be used for anything else, benefiting both Foxconn but also all of our customers with new clean renewable energy,” he said.
“As Foxconn’s operations in Wisconsin expand in response to market demand, the presence of renewable energy resources within the park demonstrates our commitment to environmental stewardship across the manufacturing supply chain to our customers and the community,” the statement read.
Foxconn says it has invested more than $1 billion in the state and employs 1,000 people who build data servers and motherboards.
The company has received about $37.4 million in state subsidies for its Mount Pleasant development, after its contract with the state was scaled back from the original 2017 pact that would have given the company almost $3 billion. The new contract allows Foxconn to receive up to $80 million for creating 1,454 jobs by 2024. The company initially planned to hire 13,000 employees.
Kelly Gallaher is a spokesperson for A Better Mount Pleasant, a watchdog group that tracks local government spending on the Foxconn project, and is running for Mount Pleasant village president against incumbent David DeGroot. She said the solar project doesn’t address the jobs Foxconn promised but never delivered.
“While I support solar energy, this doesn’t really take us any closer to realizing any of the promises that Foxconn made to this community,” Gallaher said.
The Village of Mount Pleasant and Racine County officials said they welcomed investment on the site.
“We welcome continued investment in Mount Pleasant at the Science and Technology Park and look forward to reviewing materials as part of the formal process for the Village Board of Trustees and County Board of Supervisors,” the village and county said in a joint statement.
Listen to the WPR report here.
Foxconn partners with We Energies for 2K-panel solar project was originally published by Wisconsin Public Radio.
More about the Foxconn Facility
- Mount Pleasant, Racine in Legal Battle Over Water After Foxconn Failure - Evan Casey - Sep 18th, 2024
- Biden Hails ‘Transformative’ Microsoft Project in Mount Pleasant - Sophie Bolich - May 8th, 2024
- Microsoft’s Wisconsin Data Center Now A $3.3 Billion Project - Jeramey Jannene - May 8th, 2024
- We Energies Will Spend $335 Million on Microsoft Development - Evan Casey - Mar 6th, 2024
- Foxconn Will Get State Subsidy For 2022 - Joe Schulz - Dec 11th, 2023
- Mount Pleasant Approves Microsoft Deal on Foxconn Land - Evan Casey - Nov 28th, 2023
- Mount Pleasant Deal With Microsoft Has No Public Subsidies - Evan Casey - Nov 14th, 2023
- Microsoft, State Announce Massive Data Center Expansion, Land Purchase - Joe Schulz - Nov 11th, 2023
- Gov. Evers Announces Microsoft Makes Major Investment in Wisconsin - Gov. Tony Evers - Nov 10th, 2023
- State Can’t Regulate We Energies $100 Million Project for Microsoft - Joe Schulz - Sep 20th, 2023
Read more about Foxconn Facility here
Again, why is Mount Pleasant not attempting to pivot and get Chip FAB facilities in this space instead of FOXCONN? We have a huge chip shortage in this country and manufacturing is coming back and I’m not seeing local officials fight for any of it. Your typical FAB needs 1.5-4 Million gallons of water a day and yet they’re building these FAB units in Arizona, Ohio, and California, places that are already water-stressed why are local officials not leaning on our local access to fresh water to sell this and create high paying jobs that will solidify the area’s importance internationally for the next 50 years?!?! Why are we not fighting for that instead of whatever this joke ended up being?
Great comment DanRyan. Hopefully a legislator or two will recognize a good idea when they hear it.
I can just see foxconn turning around and selling the ‘extra’ electric power at a profit to Mt. Pleasant.
What a screwed up mess. And all at my expense.
I wonder what WI’s budget would look like w/o Walker’s pet project or Gabelman’s fever dream?
I still would love to sue the legislature for fiscal malfeasance.