Circuit Court Rejects Trump’s Wisconsin Ballot Challenge
The decision could be appealed to Wisconsin Supreme Court.
A court dealt another blow Friday morning to Donald Trump‘s attempt to throw out Wisconsin’s election results.
Reserve Judge Stephen Simanek rejected the Trump campaign’s challenge to approximately 220,000 absentee ballots from Milwaukee and Dane counties. Simanek said the campaign did not demonstrate an erroneous interpretation of Wisconsin early voting laws as the campaign alleged and that the recount was transparently and properly conducted.
Simanek did not rule on the remedy the Trump campaign is seeking – throwing out only ballots from Milwaukee and Dane counties. “It is not the role of this court to determine the constitutionality of proposed remedies,” said the judge.
The Biden campaign strongly objects to Trump’s proposed remedy, arguing it violates both the Equal Protection and Due Process clauses of the constitution.
“They have very cynically targeted the two most urban, non-white and Democratic counties even though voters in the other 70 counties voted with the exact same procedures that plaintiffs say are unlawful,” said Biden attorney John Devaney.
Trump attorney Jim Troupis, arguing to throw out his own ballot amongst over 200,000 others, said clerks followed guidance from the Wisconsin Elections Commission instead of the law and were attempting to use that as a “get out of jail free card.”
Quoting a prior court ruling, he said: “they are communications about the law, not the law itself.”
“The elephant in the room that Mr. Troupis did not address and that we need to be clear about is what the plaintiffs are asking you to do here. They are asking you to throw the votes of more than 220,000 Wisconsin citizens who voted in full compliance with the laws in effect at the time of the election,” said Devaney.
Simanek agreed with Devaney and other defendants’ assertions that in-person absentee ballots had a sufficient application under the EL-122 form envelope that says “application” on it and contains the necessary information. The form was created following challenges with in-person early in 2008. That challenge was the largest one levied by the Trump campaign and involved almost half of the challenged ballots.
Much of the debate between the parties was made in briefs and affidavits totaling over 100 pages.
Simanek, noting there were less than 100 hours until the Electoral College was to meet, said he wanted to wrap things up quickly and was prepared to rule from the bench.
A hearing that began at 9 a.m. was over just after 10:30 a.m., unlike a federal hearing that lasted nearly all day Thursday. A ruling in that case, also likely to be appealed, is still pending.
If you think stories like this are important, become a member of Urban Milwaukee and help support real, independent journalism. Plus you get some cool added benefits, all detailed here.
- Murphy’s Law: How Vos Pushes The Big Lie - Bruce Murphy - Jun 1st, 2021
- Hesselbein Votes No to Republican Private Investigators - State Rep. Dianne Hesselbein - May 28th, 2021
- Robin Vos Wasting Taxpayer Resources To Investigate Non-Existent Voter Fraud - Democratic Party of Wisconsin - May 26th, 2021
- Elections Commission to Discuss Suspected Voter Fraud Reports for 2020 and 2021 Elections - Wisconsin Elections Commission - May 24th, 2021
- Murphy’s Law: The Vanishing Courage of Mike Gallagher - Bruce Murphy - May 11th, 2021
- Op Ed: Liz Cheney’s Profile In Courage - Dave Cieslewicz - May 9th, 2021
- Spindell Gets Second Term on Elections Commission - Henry Redman - Apr 30th, 2021
- A Tale of Two Elections - Melanie Conklin - Apr 26th, 2021
- Elections Commission Head Saw No Problems in Green Bay - Megan Hart - Mar 31st, 2021
- ‘Kraken’ Lawsuits Not Based on Facts - Graham Kilmer - Mar 23rd, 2021
Read more about 2020 General Election here