Mishmash of ugly artifacts in the park raises questions about “public art” initiatives.
Mishmash of ugly artifacts in the park raises questions about “public art” initiatives. Back to the full article.
You must be an Urban Milwaukee member to leave a comment. Membership, which includes a host of perks, including an ad-free website, tickets to marquee events like Summerfest, the Wisconsin State Fair and the Florentine Opera, a better photo browser and access to members-only, behind-the-scenes tours, starts at $9/month. Learn more.
If you are an existing member, sign-in to leave a comment.
Have questions? Need to report an error? Contact Us
Amen, Dick Blau. Music to my ears. Yours was my reaction when this ill-advised offense on a public space happened last year. I walked through the park the weekend before it was officially “unveiled” and already the stools were chipping.
You rightly offer kudos to NEWaukee for the many other things it has successfully done in the city in recent years. They might argue that this was not simply public art but an attempt at “place making” on a shoestring budget. Whatever. Measure twice, cut once, baby. And, if you can’t afford to do it right, don’t do it.
Totally agree with Mr.Blau! The artwork overwhelms the space and renders much of tiny space useless and visually unattractive.
I could say a similar thing about the Haymarket Square Park up on McKinley and 3rd St/MLK, a joint NeWaukee and Associated Bank project. One positive about it is that the space was an empty lot beforehand and from what I saw driving to and from, it was used mostly for neighborhood resident’s dogs to relieve themselves.
While laudible, building the park hasn’t been much of an asset. McKinley is a major thoroughfare and that site probably would be better off as built space.
As for organized uses, while NeWaukee attempted to organize at least one event there once the park opened, it hasn’t been used for any organized event since from what I can find.
Any other organization’s use would be hindered by the following:
1) Not a single tree was planted, so no shade in the summer months when the park would theoretically be used.
2) No attempt to shield the park from a busy intersection (where cars regularly go 40+ mph on their way to I-43), so very loud
3) Not enough people living in the immediate vicinity to utilize the park for their own uses
4) The one advertised use, floor shuffleboard, is played by few people
What essentially was done is to create a very nice looking lot for dogs to relieve themselves. That’s a goal that should have been accomplished on a shoestring budget. Thanks Associated Bank!
Before they tried to put art in that Postman’s Plot, they should have landscaped it. It’s shabby.
Unfortunately, this appears to have been a way for Newaukee to self promote and nothing more. They’re able to get land via their relationship with Westtown and the Alderman. The Mayor shows up to the ribbon cutting so does the media. They used a low budget/ no budget artist just looking for exposure. Both parties have little to no money to support or maintain the project and this is the result. Where was the approval process for this install? There are to many talented artist around Milwaukee for something like this to grace our downtown.
Mr. Blau’s op-ed raises many important issues and questions.
Milwaukee, both city and county, struggles to maintain and maximize its public spaces. Current dilemmas revolve not just around public-art choices but about the commons themselves–and even their purpose and continued existence.
If parks and other public spaces are not maintained they start going to seed. Sometimes concerned individuals or groups stage an intervention. That may involve sweat equity (such as removing invasive plants) or advocating for government to conduct better stewardship. Some people organize philanthropy–such as to restore Wisconsin Avenue’s bronze monuments. Art historian Diane Buck, who wrote a book chronicling Milwaukee’s public art, is leading that effort.
I recall that the original goal of Newaukee’s “pop-up” installation was to draw attention to the triangle’s neglect and potential. Apparently that led to a quiet contract of sorts to redesign and perhaps maintain the park.
It’s worth noting that this triangle is already home to a significant commissioned sculpture installed in 1989 to honor the centennial of the national founding of the Letter Carriers’ Union in a building across from the park. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Letter_Carriers'_Monument
The sculpture looks fine but the turf is so ratty and benches so puny and uncomfortable there was little reason to visit or linger. However, what process will be used to revive this–or any–public space in the city or county?
How about some public forums to collectively explore options to improve Milwaukee’s public spaces? Design and aesthetic issues, including art, could be considered. For example, what is the role of communities in using public space to create murals and other art? What about reclaiming vacant or underused spaces for everyone’s use and benefit? What about the lack of comfortable seating in many places?
Questions about privatization also merit public discussion. As governments de-fund public spaces it becomes tempting to just turn them over to private entities.Then what happens to the whole concept of public space–and the democratic expression and mingling they afford. Should neighbors of a public park be expected to foot the bill to maintain its infrastructure and amenities? In that case, do a few get to control decisions about that space?
Academics could host such forums; so could nonprofits or even concerned citizens. There’s opportunity for all sorts of creativity and civic-mindedness in thoughtfully–and democratically–revitalizing Milwaukee’s public realm.
Spot on. That is one lovely area that is mucked up by some ugly blue furniture. It seems to me that the artists (or committee) didn’t think about what this installation would look like from different angles or what a jumbled mess it would be in a smaller area. The park needs some tender loving care from a gardener with a vision on how to make the patch of earth an oasis surrounded by some interesting architecture.
We don’t need art that is just placed anywhere. Landscaping should have been a first priority. Maybe a fountain would have been nice. Do we want this triangle to be a hangout or something else?
What a mess!
Hit the restart button.
The blue furniture has always appeared to be temporary. I walk past a couple of times each week and was never inspired to sit there on backless benches amid the dog cr*p. I never gave it much thought except to wonder who in hell funds Newaukee.
One permanent Milwaukee art installation that followed a more standard process was reported on by urbanmilwaukee.com. Typically, even “going by the book”, the installation turned out to be an incomplete version of the original design, with no public explanation forthcoming. The MAM car-wrapped-around-a-pole may have been a better effort at that intersection, making real impact on the community. (I’ve heard that some guerrilla art activists have some plans for the site with … guerrillas.)
http://urbanmilwaukee.com/pressrelease/alderman-zielinski-to-host-art-stop-unveiling-event-friday/
Paint the pseudo lawn furniture a dark green and put it in Ziedler Park or Pere Marquette.
Thank you for raising this issue, Mr. Blau. As reader “Sean” commented, this was a play by NEWaukee to self-promote, something they are excellent at. They are rightly lauded for their night market. But what people don’t understand is that, while putting on a huge event like that is indeed a lot of work and requires a certain type of talent, it is much easier to be successful at events than with things like public art installations, which stick around. Public art and placemaking requires constant attention and very specific talents that NEWaukee doesn’t posses. NEWaukee has continually bombed at placemaking and public space creation. But they keep asserting and inserting themselves into this realm, using the Mayor, the Aldermen and orgs like WAMDC to give them cover and permission and publicity and money.
More Milwaukee opinions found here:
http://milwaukeerecord.com/podcast/postmans-plot-huge-mistake-just-kinda-dumb/
“Tums” down, thumbs up.