Petty Fines Create “Vicious Cycle” For The Poor
82% of those whose licenses are suspended for failing to pay fines are minorities, who are left without a way to drive to work.
Rising driver’s license suspensions for unpaid traffic tickets may be putting mobility—and employment—out of reach for many of Milwaukee’s lowest-income drivers, according to researchers and policy advocates.
The suspensions can stem from tickets as relatively minor as broken headlights or seatbelt violations.
In 2011, the Wisconsin Department of Transportation (DOT) issued about 97,000 Failure to Pay Forfeiture (FPF) suspensions to drivers in Milwaukee County, according to a 2012 report by the Employment and Training Institute (ETI) at University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
FPF suspensions have risen almost every year from 2008-2011, ETI data shows, and in that period, nearly 24,000 county residents had DOT suspensions solely for that reason. Most of those drivers live on Milwaukee’s North or South Side. Eighty-two percent are minorities; 65 percent are African-Americans.
Such statistics have led critics to refer to the situation as “driving while poor.”
“This is a poverty-driven problem,” said Nichole Yunk Todd, policy and research director at Wisconsin Community Services. “It’s not a safety-related citation, and these individuals aren’t any less safe than people who can pay their tickets on time.”
For drivers too poor to pay the fines, the suspensions “dig a hole that’s very difficult to get out of,” said ETI Director John Pawasarat.
Center for Driver’s License Recovery and Employability Supervising Attorney Molly Gena helps low- or no-income clients regain their driver’s licenses through payment plans, community service or other arrangements. (Photo by Rick Brown)
A rising trend
“Failure to Pay Forfeiture” suspensions stem from “any and all” unpaid traffic tickets from speeding to broken headlight violations, explained Angela Catania, supervisor at the Center for Driver’s License Recovery and Employability (CDLRE).
When drivers receive a ticket, they have two to three months to pay the required fine (technically called a “forfeiture”). Once that period has elapsed, courts may order an FPF suspension through the Wisconsin Division of Motor Vehicles (DMV) lasting up to two years or until the forfeitures are paid, according to Wisconsin law. A single driver may accrue multiple suspensions, one for each unpaid ticket.
To regain their licenses, Catania said, drivers usually have to pay their fines or begin a payment plan. Drivers must also pay a $60 reinstatement fee.
The road to an FPF suspension can begin with a parking ticket, according to Catania.
“An unpaid parking ticket can lead to a suspended vehicle registration,” Catania said. The driver can be stopped and given a ticket, which would lead to a license suspension if unpaid. “It just tends to create larger problems over what could have been a minor issue.”
Once drivers have an FPF suspension, they can receive multiple tickets in a single traffic stop, creating a “vicious cycle” of unpaid forfeitures that low-income drivers can’t escape from, according to Molly Gena, supervising attorney at CDLRE.
Varying viewpoints
FPF suspensions are a reasonable response to traffic violations, according to Chief Court Administrator Sheldyn Himle, speaking on behalf of the Milwaukee Municipal Court. Himle said that the consequence matches the violation.
“It makes perfect sense that if you violate traffic laws, you risk not being able to drive,” said Himle in an email. “And if you have the ability to pay for car insurance and gas, you should be able to pay your fines.”
CDLRE cofounder and volunteer attorney Jim Gramling believes the issue is more complicated. In his 21 years as a Milwaukee municipal judge, Gramling said he saw “hundreds of thousands” of traffic cases. Though some “irresponsible” people may choose not to pay, he said, others are simply unable to do so.
“A huge percentage [of suspensions], well over 50 percent, I’m sure, are on the part of low-income drivers or no-income drivers who are unable to budget a forfeiture along with all their other expenses,” Gramling said. “They can’t pay and thus suffer a suspension.”
Todd, of Wisconsin Community Services, agrees, adding that two-year FPF suspensions are ineffective if the goal is to collect the fines. According to a CDLRE analysis of Milwaukee Municipal Court payment patterns, individuals make almost 92 percent of all payments within six months of the judgments.
FPF Suspensions
FPF suspensions are rising statewide. They have increased 44 percent from about 170,000 in 2008 to 220,000 in 2011, according to DOT data (see chart, left). In 2012, those suspensions accounted for a little more than 55 percent of all suspensions or revocations in Wisconsin.
According to the CDLRE, the increase is likely due to the recession and insurance laws. In June 2010, Wisconsin became one of the last states to introduce mandatory insurance. Since then, tickets for not having insurance have become the fourth most common traffic ticket in the state, as of 2012 records.
“Because of this vast number of violations being written now for operating without insurance, people who can’t afford it are being given more tickets that they can’t pay, and the suspensions are piling up,” Gramling said.
The suspensions do not affect all Milwaukeeans equally. According to Pawasarat, unlike Operating While Intoxicated suspensions, which are broadly represented citywide, FPF suspensions are heavily clustered in the city’s poorest minority neighborhoods.
“OWI is an indicator of real driving problems,” said Pawasarat. “Not paying your bills isn’t a driving problem. It’s a problem related to being poor, especially in neighborhoods that are African-American.”
Many of those who cannot pay, he added, resort to driving “under the radar.” “If you see yourself as not having a prayer [of having a valid license], you’ll just drive anyway,” Pawasarat said.
Jose, who declined to give his last name, is one of those drivers. A South Side resident and parent, he lost his license in 2003 due to an Operating While Intoxicated offense.
Jose said he stayed off the road for five years after the incident. But when he began trying to pay off his tickets and get his license reinstated, he explained, driving became a necessity.
“It’s a ‘catch-22,’” Jose said. “I have to pay off these tickets, but to get money you have to work. Many of the good jobs are outside of [Milwaukee]. It’s a must that you drive.”
Working and keeping a low profile, Jose said he now drives “only when it’s necessary.” He hopes to save enough money to pay his fines and have his license reinstated in order to get a construction job.
Supervisor Angela Catania explains how to regain a driver’s license to Hakim Fudge, who has 15 unpaid tickets, at the Center for Driver’s License Recovery and Employability. (Photo by Rick Brown)
Help is available
The CDLRE, 700 W. State St., aims to help individuals in Milwaukee County with FPF suspensions and other driver’s license issues. Founded in 2007 and operated by Wisconsin Community Services, the center also is supported by Legal Action of Wisconsin, Milwaukee Municipal Court and Milwaukee Area Technical College (MATC), according to Todd.
“The center was created because the founders saw a gap in the community for people who had a suspended or revoked driver’s license with a low income who didn’t have the means to pay thousands of dollars in non-moving tickets,” Todd said.
The CDLRE aims to help county residents recover their licenses through case management and legal services, Catania said, with a target of enrolling 325 residents and advising 400 people at community outreach events each year.
The center’s current license recovery success rate is approximately 60 percent, she added.
Clients are all at or below 200 percent of the federal poverty level, and most are African-American. All get to CDLRE from referrals by organizations such as Milwaukee Municipal Court, MATC and Milwaukee Urban League.
“Our clients are trying to do the right thing,” Todd said. “Fines can stack up rather quickly for adults who can’t pay tickets. It gets to a point where the situation has to change, and that’s why they’re here.”
In addition to directly assisting residents, the CDLRE has championed four successful state-level reforms, Todd said, including Wisconsin Act 102, which ended mandatory license revocations for drivers with four Operating While Suspended convictions.
The majority of the CDLRE’s clients are dealing with FPF suspensions, according to Gena, who leads the center’s two-person legal team with support from Gramling, a volunteer attorney.
Driver’s license law is complicated, Gena said, in part because some clients must deal with more than one jurisdiction or court system.
Gena works with clients to recover their licenses, typically by establishing payment plans or community service arrangements through which clients can have their suspensions lifted while they pay their fines.
One of the people depending on the Center’s assistance is Hakim Fudge, 22, who lives on the North Side. Fudge’s license expired in 2010 and is currently suspended for 15 unpaid city tickets.
MCTS Transit Miles
An MATC student in accounting and business, Fudge continued to drive. Not having a license has been a “big problem,” he said.
“I get pulled over a lot,” Fudge said. “I get more tickets on top of more tickets. It’s put me in a hole.” Fudge hopes to regain his license with the CDLRE’s assistance while continuing his education.
Not having a license is “the most important barrier to employment which you can fix,” said Pawasarat, referring to CDLRE’s efforts.
With many jobs moving outside the city, having a driver’s license is a necessity, Pawasarat said. “Many jobs are not reachable by public transportation.”
Even for those individuals who can take the bus, the situation is getting more difficult. Public transit mileage has declined every year since 2008, according to Milwaukee County Transit System (MCTS) reports (see graphic, left).
For many workers, taking public transit simply isn’t an option, according to Todd. “The [fares] just keep going up and the routes just keep getting reduced. It’s especially hard to make that work with children.”
Employers may also use a driver’s license as a “measure of responsibility,” utilizing it as a filter on applicants even in non-driving occupations, according to Catania.
Policy effort
The CDLRE hopes to address FPF suspensions directly with a new legislative proposal to reduce suspension lengths from two years to six months.
Todd said the CDLRE is “really hopeful” that the nonpartisan bill can be passed and hopes the process will start early next year. She added that it has state-level Democratic and Republican support, but declined to name individual legislators.
FPF suspensions, the proposal states, “exist solely as a forfeiture collection method” for courts, but more than 90 percent of drivers pay in the first six months. The longer suspensions, which exceed some drunk driving suspensions and revocations, “only serve to penalize low-income drivers,” according to the proposal.
Courts would still be able to intercept state tax refunds to pay overdue forfeitures that outlast the suspension period, Todd said, so the CDLRE believes no revenue will be lost.
“We actually think it [revenue] will increase because people will be able to pay fines better [with fewer suspensions],” Todd said.
Gramling said the bill could be extremely important in addressing the growing FPF suspension issue. “If we’re successful in getting the period reduced, I think we’ll have done as much as we can policy-wise to eliminate unnecessary obstacles to driving for low-income drivers.”
This story was originally published by Milwaukee Neighborhood News Service, where you can find other stories reporting on fifteen city neighborhoods in Milwaukee.
I get pulled over a lot,” Fudge said. “I get more tickets on top of more tickets. It’s put me in a hole.”
Why would we ever want someone like this to get out of the hole? He obviously doesn’t learn from his mistakes and continues to drive recklessly.
As one of my favorite comedy characters once said to Judge Maybelline “suspend my license! I got keys don’t I”
I know the jails are overcrowded with plenty of nonviolent criminals but the dangerous operation of a multi-ton machine that causes hundreds of deaths a year in this state can hardly be considered non-violent.
Hmmm, I seem to remember an auto MANDATE, um DEAR LEADER DECLARATION, um ‘buyback’ program a few years ago that was touted as remarkably successful. Because everyone should drive green cars, whether they can afford them or not.
So, that problem was solved. And Detroit was saved too (don’t listen to all this silly talk about ‘bancruptcy there) And now everyone has affordable health care! Just go online and sign right up! It’s wonderful to live in paradise, and why should should everyone have to obey the rules and laws anyways?
And if you need a house, just ask Barney Frank or Tony Rezko for advice. Everything’s great! Let’s build a trolley!
I don’t want to put people in a spiral that they can’t get out of… but there’s a lot of stuff I have a problem with here. First and foremost is that they supported a change to make it easier for people to keep their license after FIVE owi’s!!!!! All the talk about non-moving and non-safety violations is proven to be an invalid argument if they support things like this.
Second, if they are really concerned about getting people to work, how about helping people obtain occupational licenses and working with the laws regarding occupational licenses? There’s no reason that someone who doesn’t pay their fines or “gets pulled over all the time” to keep a regular license. I’m suspicious about the actual percent of people out there can’t pay a $20 seat belt fine or $15-25 parking ticket. Not to mention that non-moving violations further take ANOTHER moving ticket and not paying that one either for someone to lose their license.
Besides all this, the fact that 90% of these people pay their fines within 6 months of the FPF… demonstrates that the vast majority CAN pay but chose not to. There are payment plans even.
Now I’m not saying there arn’t a few people out there who literally can not pay a $20 ticket… but I’m willing to bet that the percentage is *extremely* low and they probably can’t afford to drive a car to begin with. If that’s the case, we need to start the whole transportation discussion.
… and surely if they can not pay the ticket that started the process … how on earth are they going to be able to afford INSURANCE or do they get that free … through some bullshit government plan too ????
What about the 15 month old child that was killed on 6th an Hayes this week … by a driver that had no license after 3, 4, or 5 revocations and of coarse no insurance … do you think he can afford to pay for this horrible loss … insurance cannot even correct that !!!! You are suspended from driving for a reason, it is a privelege to drive not a “RIGHT” Is a minority any different than a non minority that cannot afford something ???? NOPE !!!!
Let us also remember that the situation is complicated by the refusal of suburban governments to allow transit in their communities. These are the same places where the new jobs are. It is a scandal of the first order. I’m talking about you, Mequon, with your thousands of low-paying jobs and no way to get to them.
Cops there have a field day finding equipment violations, expired plates, etc., and other ways to bust black people in white uniforms on their way to the nursing homes, hospitals and other respites of the privileged.
Why always jump to race?? The Mequon cops aren’t racist… like all suburbs, they’re forced to have a certain amount of “activity” (or other term depending on which department you’re referring to) and there just aren’t enough murders and domestic violence to fill the calls. Thus they look for ANYONE with violations to fill their required activity levels. Not that we should defend these actions… but Mr. Horne, your race baiting is pointless.
This is really addressing a symptom without addressing the actual problem. The real problem here (imo) is that huge swaths of the metro area are inaccessable via transit, and that we continue to build communities that require driving to get around. In a lot of ways, working to give people more and more chances to get their licenses back actually makes this worse.
Also, anyone who bikes and walks on city streets in Milwaukee knows that we have a ton of drivers out there who don’t respect traffic law at all and shouldn’t be driving. While I get the racial and economic issues at play here, I’m honestly not sure folks should be getting so many chances to continue driving without changing behavior.
So the solution is this. No more fines on poor people. They get everything else for free, why not punishments? Of course, when we do get mass transit, they will get their fares courtesy of the remaining taxpayers. Oh and more UrbanMilwaukee race card usage. How surprising.
You know what would really give Urban Milwaukee some credibility by showing some balance? A Bike Czar or Car Culture article written to argue against the ideas in this article.
Casey, to make it easier they could just post a link to AM 620’s website… Bam, done.
When a state enacts a mandatory auto insurance law, of course, there are around 20% of the population who are instant criminals. Then in addition to the 8,000$ a poor household has to pay for auto insurance (three teens), they add the fines for no insurance. The result is more stolen cars, more stolen plates, more hit and runs, more on food stamps, more at the food bank, more landlords not getting their rent., etc. I myself collected 3,000$ of food stamps and LIEAP due to Montana’s mandatory auto insurance law. I am an excellent driver for 50 years, never had an accident, never had a violation. An excellent driver will probably spend 20,000$ in his lifetime for auto insurance, which is money lost. That is the same thing as if someone had his 20,000$ wrecked by an uninsured driver. What is your solution to that problem? (If you are not too busy, do a food stamp survey and see how many are on food stamps due to fines, mandatory auto insurance, etc. In Montana 18 of 96 said auto insurance, fines, and DUI were a reason for needing food stamps.
Don, where do you get $8,000 a year for insurance??
And again, if you can’t afford insurance, maintanence of your car to keep it safe for you and others around you, or to pay for the normal course of owning a car then that’s it… you can’t afford it. Luckily, even though Milwaukee’s transit system needs work, it’s far better than Montana. In Milwaukee you can get by without a car.
I’m glad we have mandatory insurance laws. In fact, they should be stricter. As someone who has been the victim of someone driving without insurance who caused an accident, and having close friends get hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of medical bills from them, I propose we make higher coverage insurance mandatory.
Finally, I’m not sure if you’re going to get any sympathy by saying someone who drank, drove, and got caught needs food stamps. They’re lucky they only need food stamps… it could be worse, they could have murdered someone with their car instead of gotten a ticket.