87 Units Along the River

7 thoughts on “87 Units Along the River”

1. Frank says:

   January 21, 2013 at 4:28 pm

   Apparently good architecture is a dying art form. Some might say that it is dead in the water.

2. Deborah says:

   January 21, 2013 at 5:40 pm

   I agree. Not a very attractive building. Is’nt there an arts and design committee ?

3. Dave Reid says:

   January 21, 2013 at 5:46 pm

   @Deborah An arts and design committee? No. A couple areas in the city have an Architectural Review Board, but not this street.

4. D says:

   January 21, 2013 at 6:07 pm

   I don’t think it’s an ugly building at all. It looks like most newer residental buildings in the area. I don’t care so much about design at this location as I do density.

5. Chris says:

   January 22, 2013 at 11:28 am

   This is far from a bad design. What it is is a somewhat tired material palette and facade treatment. The massing works quite well and the pool deck will be a great amenity (hope it gets good sun though). I’d love to see the envelope pushed here, but I can’t complain about a quality infill project like this.

6. Mr. Michael Horne says:

   January 22, 2013 at 12:20 pm

   Option “C” is the only way to go for the Riverwalk.

7. Billy says:

   January 23, 2013 at 9:44 am

   I actually love this proposal, and agree option C is best