South Side Leaders Blast Residency Proposal
Walker proposal to end residency requirement will hurt city's economy, they charge.
South Side community leaders and citizens are riled up over a provision in Gov. Scott Walker’s budget that would end the residency requirement for city workers statewide.
State Rep. JoCasta Zamarippa (D-8th) and Steve Fendt, executive director of the Southside Organizing Committee (SOC), said ending the residency requirement in Milwaukee not only will affect the quality of services, but will harm the tax base if middle-class city employees move elsewhere.
“It’s economics 101; we want money spent (to pay) city employees to stay in the city,” Fendt said.
Zamarippa said she is upset with the way Walker handled the issue. Including repeal of the residency requirement in the budget bill rather than as a separate item, makes it more likely to pass, Zamarippa said. She noted that it would be difficult to attain Republican support to remove the requirement from the budget.
“It’s always been a stand-alone item and it’s never passed; (Walker) made it a very unfair fight, a political issue,” said Zamarippa.
Walker did not mention the provision ending the residency requirement during his biennial budget speech Feb. 20, but has long been a vocal opponent of the requirement. The governor has been quoted saying that city employees should not be forced to live in the city.
Fendt argued that city jobs pay good wages and have good pensions, and that if people don’t want to live in the city they don’t have the right to a city job.
“There are plenty of applicants for city jobs; we don’t have to hire people who don’t want to be here,” Fendt said.
Fendt, Zamarippa and other community members attended a press conference at the SOC headquarters, 1300 S. Layton Blvd. in Clarke Square to denounce Walker’s plan. They stated that city workers residing in the city — especially police officers — makes neighborhoods safer, builds trust between law enforcement and the community and improves the quality of services.
Fendt said ending the residency requirement undermines Milwaukee and especially older neighborhoods such as those on the south side.
“The fact that they (city workers) keep on asking about leaving is disconcerting; I mean, do you really want to be with us?” Fendt asked.
Fendt noted that he plans to reach out to other local organizations to help fight the measure.
Zamarippa added that she hopes the provision fails in the court of public opinion. Referring to city employees, she said, “We need them here to help us continue to build a solid middle class.”
This story was originally published by Milwaukee Neighborhood News Service, where you can find other stories reporting on fifteen city neighborhoods in Milwaukee.
Political Contributions Tracker
Displaying political contributions between people mentioned in this story. Learn more.
Why not just give a pay cut/ raise if people choose to live in the city or not? Is that constitutional? Seems like a reasonable compromise.
The thing is – I agree with the residency requirement in principal, but city leaders have to understand that public schools generally suck in Milwaukee. Even I would consider living in a suburb if I had kids. It’s a big deal to most people.
Walker is a complete ass but he knows how to rile people up about that and he’s winning the argument big-time. Many Milwaukee leaders are still totally asleep at the wheel about this. Let the Charter Schools expand and cut the cruft so that property taxes can come down a little, even symbolically.