Wisconsinites Residents Oppose Gas Plants Proposed to Power Big Tech’s Data Centers
New analysis of public testimony during hearings highlights health, environmental and energy-cost concerns surrounding the proposed Foundry Ridge and Red Oak Ridge plants
MILWAUKEE – Invenergy is planning to build two expensive new methane gas plants to power data centers in Wisconsin, with the goal of selling them to We Energies, despite the health, environmental and energy-cost consequences for Wisconsin communities. The two proposed gas plants in southeastern Wisconsin – the Foundry Ridge project in Darien, Wisconsin (Docket 9835-CE-100) and the Red Oak Ridge project proposal in Paris, Wisconsin (Docket 9837-CE-100) – represent a massive expansion of methane gas infrastructure to serve rapid data center development in Wisconsin.
New analysis of public comments submitted to the Public Service Commission (PSC) found that a majority of comments opposed both proposed gas plants. During the PSC hearings, 82% of speakers opposed the Foundry Ridge plant, while 88% opposed the Red Oak Ridge plant. Speakers raised concerns about higher energy costs, air and water pollution, public health risks and the burden the projects would place on nearby communities. Environmental, public health and community groups highlighted the findings during a virtual press briefing today and urged the PSC to deny both proposals.
“Building two new very expensive methane gas plants to serve Big Tech’s data centers is a step backward and Wisconsin can’t afford it,” said Cassie Steiner, senior campaign coordinator at Sierra Club Wisconsin. “Our communities showed up to testify and made it clear these projects would put their pocketbooks, air, water and health at risk.”
Advocates and subject matter experts raised concerns about gaps in Wisconsin’s regulatory review process for gas plants tied to data center development, citing a recent policy brief from the Union of Concerned Scientists. The report details how the current process of approving power plants, which considers the developer’s and utility’s applications separately, creates a loophole that restricts the PSC’s ability to weigh public concern against the plants’ harmful impacts.
“Wisconsin’s fragmented regulatory framework isolates decision-making at the expense of customers, restricting the PSC’s ability to consider public concern about the harmful impacts of new fossil gas plants,” said Maria Fernanda Chavez, senior energy analyst at the Union of Concerned Scientists. “Utilities are circumventing the public need to give Big Tech the ability to pollute the air without being held accountable. Wisconsin needs community-driven solutions that bolster a cleaner and more affordable energy future. Commissioners and elected officials must prioritize energy policy that puts people above profits.”
These proposals are part of an expanding pipeline of gas plants intended to meet the rapidly increasing demand of hyperscale data centers. We Energies is taking advantage of data centers coming to Wisconsin to expand its fossil fuel infrastructure, which worsens our air, harms our health and raises our energy bills, as explored in a new report by Healthy Climate Wisconsin.
Wisconsin needs an integrated resource planning requirement and a strong clean energy standard so rising electricity demand is evaluated comprehensively, and met with the lowest-cost, cleanest clean energy resources.
NOTE: This press release was submitted to Urban Milwaukee and was not written by an Urban Milwaukee writer. While it is believed to be reliable, Urban Milwaukee does not guarantee its accuracy or completeness.
Recent Press Releases by Power Wisconsin Forward
Milwaukee Community Groups Announce “People’s Audit” of We Energies
Nov 4th, 2025 by Power Wisconsin ForwardClean energy advocates look to hold We Energies accountable for rising utility costs
