Circuit Court Issues Order Limiting Pipeline Construction While Lawsuit Over Line 5 Permits Moves Forward
Iron County, WI— Today, a Wisconsin circuit court ordered Enbridge Energy to halt pipeline construction at certain locations while it reviews a lawsuit challenging state regulatory approvals for the Canadian energy giant’s controversial plan to build a new 41-mile segment of its Line 5 oil pipeline around the Bad River Reservation in northern Wisconsin.
Judge John P. Anderson allowed most construction activities to continue but also ordered a stay of construction at specific water crossings, providing time for him to complete his review. The partial grant of a stay is based on the court’s finding that Enbridge’s eligibility for permits at those locations “may be on tenuous legal footing.”
Today’s stay decision means that Enbridge will likely not be able to complete its planned water crossings until the circuit court fully considers all of the alleged defects in the permit decision.
The court order marks the latest development in an ongoing legal battle over permits issued by the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources. Most recently, environmental groups filed a petition for judicial review and a motion for a temporary stay after an administrative law judge upheld the permits in February.
The petition for judicial review was filed by Clean Wisconsin and nonprofit law firm Midwest Environmental Advocates (MEA), which represents Sierra Club, 350 Wisconsin and the League of Women Voters of Wisconsin. The Bad River Band of Lake Superior Chippewa, represented by Earthjustice, filed a similar petition.
The groups argue that the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources did not properly apply Wisconsin’s environmental laws and failed to fully account for the environmental harm the project would cause.
A central legal issue in this case is whether Enbridge is eligible under Wisconsin law to place materials and structures in navigable waters protected by the state’s Public Trust Doctrine. Environmental groups and the Band contend that Wisconsin law clearly limits such eligibility to persons or entities that own land adjoining the waterbody. In many instances, they argue, Enbridge does not meet this requirement because it lacks riparian ownership.
The judge’s decision today validates those concerns. In response to the order, Midwest Environmental Advocates, Clean Wisconsin, Sierra Club, the League of Women Voters of Wisconsin and 350 Wisconsin issued the following statements:
Midwest Environmental Advocates spokesperson Peg Sheaffer said, “The judge’s order prevents Enbridge from undertaking construction at specific water crossings, which likely means the reroute cannot be completed before the court completes its review. We are confident that, in the end, the permits will be invalidated and Enbridge will be forced to abandon its plans for this disastrous project.”
Clean Wisconsin Staff Attorney Evan Feinauer said, “The court’s decision to limit construction activities recognizes the seriousness of the legal issues before it. The record developed during the hearing shows that the DNR failed to comply with state law and its obligation to protect our wetlands and waterways. The judicial review process is essential to correcting those errors and ensuring environmental standards are properly applied.”
Elizabeth Ward, Sierra Club Wisconsin Chapter Director said, “By preventing Enbridge from doing work at specific sites that require riparian ownership the court has acknowledged the significant concerns with this permit and its impact on water. Line 5 is a threat to our water, Tribal sovereignty, and our climate. It must be shut down. The reroute does not eliminate any of those threats—it only makes them worse.”
Debra Cronmiller, Executive Director of the League of Women Voters of Wisconsin said, “The court’s decision underscores the importance of getting this right. Wisconsinites expect major infrastructure decisions to follow a transparent, evidence-based process that complies with the law. The court will now undertake the careful review that communities, natural resources, and Tribal nations deserve.”
Emily Park, Co-Executive Director of 350 Wisconsin said, “The stay will limit harm while this case moves forward. Line 5 is an aging pipeline that threatens clean water and worsens the climate crisis. Wisconsin should be investing in safe, clean energy—not doubling down on risky fossil fuel infrastructure. We’re proud to stand with our partners to protect our waters and build a healthier future.
NOTE: This press release was submitted to Urban Milwaukee and was not written by an Urban Milwaukee writer. While it is believed to be reliable, Urban Milwaukee does not guarantee its accuracy or completeness.
Mentioned in This Press Release
Recent Press Releases by Midwest Environmental Advocates
MEA Files Appeal in Legal Dispute Over Public’s Right to Access Great Lakes Shoreline
Feb 12th, 2026 by Midwest Environmental AdvocatesAppeal follows municipal court ruling upholding trespassing ticket issued to Shorewood resident walking along Lake Michigan
MEA Files Lawsuit to Challenge Secrecy Surrounding Energy Demands of Meta’s Beaver Dam Data Center
Dec 10th, 2025 by Midwest Environmental AdvocatesComplaint Filed after Public Service Commission Denies Records Request, Claims Confidentiality
MEA Announces Legal Action in Response to West Bend Dairy Farm’s Expansion Plans
Dec 2nd, 2025 by Midwest Environmental AdvocatesDNR Permit for Rob-n-Cin Farms Ignores Past Environmental Violations and Endangers Groundwater, Trout Streams and Wetlands
