Wisconsin Public Radio

Legislative Proposal Would Reverse DPI’s Changes To School Testing Benchmarks

Superintendent Jill Underly has faced criticism around decision to change standards.

By , Wisconsin Public Radio - Feb 6th, 2025 06:52 pm
Riverwest Elementary School, 2765 N. Fratney St. File photo by Dave Reid.

Riverwest Elementary School, 2765 N. Fratney St. File photo by Dave Reid.

A proposal to roll back recent changes to Wisconsin’s test score standards got its first hearing in the state Legislature Thursday.

The Department of Public Instruction’s overhaul of how student achievement on state tests is measured has gotten political blowback from both sides of the aisle.

Under the Republican proposal, DPI would have to use the same benchmark scores, score ranges and corresponding qualitative descriptions that were used on school report cards published in the 2019-20 school year.

In a rare form of solidarity with Democratic Gov. Tony Evers, Republican Sen. John Jagler, R-Watertown, began his presentation on the proposal reading a quote from the governor.

“I think we need to have as high standards as possible. I don’t think we should be lowering them,” Jagler said. “That’s not my quote. That’s a quote from Gov. Evers, and I think the sentiment we all can agree on: It was a mistake.”

Evers told reporters in early January there were not enough conversations before the change.

This year, assessment benchmark scores were updated by DPI for the Forward Exam, which is given to students in grades three through eight, and the PreACT Secure and ACT tests.

The terms “below basic,” “basic,” “proficient” and “advanced,” which had been used since 2014, have been replaced with “developing,” “approaching,” “meeting” and “advanced” to describe the skill level on the Forward Exam.

The new standards for the Wisconsin Forward Exam don’t align with the scores with the National Assessment of Educational Progress, or NAEP, test. The change also makes it difficult to compare this year’s Forward Exam scores with previous years.

“The changes made by DPI last year broke the connection to previous years to allow us to see how our kids are performing over time,” said Jagler, who co-authored the bill. “As we move out of COVID, it is more important than ever that we’re able to see how our educational system is advancing or not advancing.”

Jason Stein, who heads the nonpartisan Wisconsin Policy Forum, testified that the change by DPI made it difficult to compare this year’s school district data with past year’s numbers.

The Policy Forum uses Forward Exam data to compare school districts over time and to each other. Stein said having consistent data is important for parents and taxpayers.

“Our goal is that a school board member in a Northwoods district, or a single mother in Milwaukee, or a stay-at-home dad in La Crosse can take this data and they can understand what it means. And they can use it to make better decisions, whether that’s where their child goes to school, how they interact with their school district, or what policies their school district takes on,” Stein said.

DPI has repeatedly said — including in lengthy testimony on Thursday — that standards have not been lowered. Instead, the new scoring illustrates what students should know at every grade level.

State Superintendent Jill Underly speaks Thursday, Sept. 21, 2023, at the Wisconsin State Capitol in Madison, Wis. Angela Major/WPR

State Superintendent Jill Underly speaks Thursday, Sept. 21, 2023, at the Wisconsin State Capitol in Madison, Wis. Angela Major/WPR

Testing top issue in State Superintendent race

The testing standards change has emerged as the top issue in the state superintendent race.

Incumbent DPI Secretary Jill Underly will face challengers Jeff Wright, Sauk Prairie’s superintendent; and Brittany Kinser, an education consultant, in the primary election Feb. 18.

The top two vote-getters will move onto the April 1 election.

Both Wright and Kinser have cited Undery’s decision to change state testing benchmarks as reasons for running.

Underly did not attend Thursday’s meeting, but her top deputy Tom McCarthy said educational standards had not been lowered “one iota.”

McCarthy said comparing the Forward Exam to NAEP isn’t relevant, because the national test does not have “educational standards” like DPI does.

“NAEP has always been more aggressive, always been more intense, and that is why you’ve seen gaps between performance, not just in Wisconsin, but across every other state in the nation,” McCarthy said.

Assembly committee hears several other proposals

While testing benchmarks was the main focus of the Committee on Education Thursday, the panel held four other public hearings.

State Rep. Amanda Nedweski, R-Pleasant Prairie, has brought back a proposal from last session to require school districts to teach civics education for at least one semester.

Currently, Wisconsin students must have three credits of social studies. The bill would carve out a half credit of that specifically for civics instruction. Previously, Nedweski wanted DPI to develop the curriculum. She said Thursday she would like the school districts to develop their own curriculum.

Other bills being considered include:

  • Requiring cursive writing in elementary school,
  • Requiring school boards to make textbooks and curriculum available for public inspection,
  • Requiring a school board to spend at least 70 percent of its operating budget directly in the classroom.

Listen to the WPR report

New proposal could reverse changes to Wisconsin school testing benchmarks was originally published by Wisconsin Public Radio.

If you think stories like this are important, become a member of Urban Milwaukee and help support real, independent journalism. Plus you get some cool added benefits.

Leave a Reply

You must be an Urban Milwaukee member to leave a comment. Membership, which includes a host of perks, including an ad-free website, tickets to marquee events like Summerfest, the Wisconsin State Fair and the Florentine Opera, a better photo browser and access to members-only, behind-the-scenes tours, starts at $9/month. Learn more.

Join now and cancel anytime.

If you are an existing member, sign-in to leave a comment.

Have questions? Need to report an error? Contact Us