Patricia Jursik
Press Release

Negotiations With Southridge to Improve Safety at Bus Stop Fails

Supervisor Patricia Jursik Criticizes Southridge Management for treatment of elderly, disabled and all transit users in failing to reach a fair agreement to provide safe bus stops at Southridge Mall

By - Oct 22nd, 2014 01:43 pm

After a long summer of meetings between Southridge Management and the County to improve safety and access at the Southridge Mall, the agreement broke down over the Southridge demand for payment of “tolls”. Having previously delayed a County ordinance creating a disorderly conduct penalty for any person interfering with bus users, on indication from management at Southridge that they were interested in finding a solution to this safety concern for bus users at the mall, the County and Southridge nearly found common ground on improved bus stops. But Southridge insisted on a yearly payment even though the county was willing to pay for the costs related to the improvements of the bus stop.

The County Board does not want to initiate a practice of paying tolls to access public places such as shopping malls or sporting venues for bus access. As a result of this impasse, Jursik reintroduced the earlier County ordinance which was on layover status pending a compromise.

The ordinance would create a $250 disorderly conduct citation to any person interfering with transit users.

The proposal was passed by a 6-1 vote by the Transportation, Public Works and Transit Committee on Wednesday and now moves to the full County Board for consideration.

Southridge management, Simon Property Group, of Indianapolis, moved regular bus stops at the mall entrance on Nov. 1 of last year, requiring disabled people to walk 1,000 ft. from the replacement bus stop to the mall entrance. Because Southridge management still allows paratransit vehicles to stop near the mall entrance, they have claimed the disabled have access.

The ordinance states that disorderly conduct includes interfering with the operation of any Milwaukee County transit bus, including pickup or discharge of passengers, on any roadway or parking lot held out for use of the general public for parking or vehicular travel or on any roadway or parking lot made available to delivery vehicles of more than 20,000 pounds maximum gross weight.

The resolution further states that any person violating the provision of this section of the County code shall, for each offense, forfeit a penalty not to exceed $250 and those in default of payments shall be imprisoned in the county jail or the House of Correction for a period not to exceed ninety 90 days at the discretion of the court.

“We have finally had to resort to this measure in order to get Southridge to listen to our concerns and address them in a reasonable manner,” Jursik said. “We have negotiated in good faith for the past year, but Southridge has not. We now need to move forward with a measure that will force them to reach a reasonable solution and get them to rethink their obstinate position”.

Mentioned in This Press Release

Recent Press Releases by Patricia Jursik

O’Donnell Property Agreement with the Milwaukee Art Museum is a WIN/WIN.

In late 2015, not satisfied with the plan negotiated by the County Executive, the County Board chose to reimagine the O’Donnell plaza and garage proposal.

The Century Parks of Bay View, Sheridan and Grant Must Be Protected

Sup. Jursik Calls for Zoning Protection for South Shore Parks

Patricia Jursik

Sup. Jursik: Softball, Baseball Diamonds in South Shore Parks Suffer Under County Executive Abele

She Says South Shore Diamonds Could Have Been Repaired With $300,000 Surplus in Parks Revenue

2 thoughts on “Negotiations With Southridge to Improve Safety at Bus Stop Fails”

  1. David Ciepluch says:

    I would have thought that in the initial plan submitted and permitting process for the entire complex that started in the 1970s, there would be language in the approved plan and permit to address traffic egress and access including public transportation. Although this period may not have included this type of enlightenment.

  2. Rich says:

    I’m confused. Who are they going to fine and put in jail, exactly?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *