Ald. Bob Bauman
Press Release

Ald. Bauman Responds to ATU Local 998’s Anti-streetcar Letter

Letter to ATU Local 998 was released to the media by Alderman Robert Bauman.

By - Jan 28th, 2015 09:08 am

Thank you for your letter.

I have lived in Milwaukee for 38 years, I have advocated for expanded and improved transit for over 25 years, I have been an ally and friend of the ATU Local 998 for 25 years (including several endorsements), and I have been a member of the Common Council for 11 years. With this background, I completely reject your analysis on many levels.

First, your facts are wrong. For example, what is the factual basis for the statement that an “overwhelming majority” of transit riders are transit dependent? What is the factual  basis for your assertion that a streetcar will hurt bus routes and bus ridership? On this point, I have specifically told the leadership of the ATU Local that our routes have been intentionally designed to supplement and complement existing bus routes, not replace them. Even a cursory review of current bus routes and the streetcar route would reveal this fact. Moreover, it has always been the city’s intention of have the Milwaukee County Transit System operate the streetcar with your workers.

In addition, you exhibit a fundamental misunderstanding of the financing of this project. The federal and local funding sources can only be used for capital costs, not operating costs. Expanding the existing bus network is primarily an operating cost problem since it would involve more bus hours. Not one dime of the federal and local funds can be used for “expanding the bus network,” which I assume you know, or at least should know in your capacity as a leader of a national transit union. If we reject this investment, not one additional bus hour will be created and not one hour of work for a transit worker will be created.

You sentiments explain in part why transit faces political and funding crises in many major urban areas. Attacking one form of transit technology in favor of another technology makes absolutely no sense if you want a greater share of discretionary public resources devoted to transit service. We build public and political support for transit by broadening the ridership base as much as possible. If that requires streetcars, light rail, heavy rail rapid transit, commuter rail, BRT or regular buses in particular circumstances, then so be it.

The goal should be getting the public into transit vehicle seats. More people in seats translates to more transit vehicles which translates to more transit workers–your workers. This proposition would seem so elemental, that is breathtaking that a national leader of transit workers would actually object to an investment in expanded transit infrastructure, especially an investment that cannot be used for any other purpose.

Robert J. Bauman
Alderman, 4th District

Recent Press Releases by Ald. Bob Bauman

“Cream of Cream City” to be recognized at historic preservation awards ceremony

Annual preservation honors event to be held at Best Place at the Pabst

Paul Henningsen had a passion for service, neighborhood revitalization

Statement from Alderman Robert J. Bauman October 20, 2016

Overnight concrete operation at NML tower site

Important NML construction site operation update from Alderman Robert Bauman

3 thoughts on “Ald. Bauman Responds to ATU Local 998’s Anti-streetcar Letter”

  1. Maggie Jacobus says:

    This is when that Northwestern University law degree really comes in handy, Alderman Bauman! Excellent, thoughtful, well-reasoned and factual response.

  2. Midthun says:

    Their assertion that, “One-third of working-age residents do not even live near a transit stop. A streetcar is
    not going to help these people,” is pretty stark in light of the previous County Executive’s efforts to cut and reroute buses.

  3. Edward Hermann says:

    The report airing on TV4 on Monday eve, Feb 2nd, 2015 has explained how your committee has approved all taxi cab driver applications except for the one person who didn’t show. I’d like to say that this is a gross dereliction of duty. You are approving people with a checkered past to drive the public through the streets of Milwaukee. Though no problems have shown up yet, when one does, you are going to be in the hot seat. Our city elects you to do a good job making good decisions. In our opinion, (i.e. the viewers of Milwaukee), you have shown negligence in decision making. I recommend you sit down with your committee and re-define your decision making behavior considering the health and safety of the citizens of Milwaukee. If you don’t, in the future you may wish you had.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *