Mathew, SS raises a really good point. I generally agree with your argument and if you compared say, bike commuters with car commuters then there might be some interesting correlation.
But he’s right, the worst obesity in the US is in the urban black population – who typically live in compact, theoretically walkable urban neighborhoods – including much of Milwaukee. These communities may be walkable, but they are hit by the extra whammy of poverty, miserable education levels, and almost no access to anything but junk food. Ironically, in those neighborhoods the only thing you can walk to is McDonalds or the liquor store, so not having a car actually makes nutrition worse.
At the end of the day, educated and prosperous walkable areas have thinner people, but without education and prosperity, even walkability gets trumped.
I’m still pretty worried about the political posturing that’s going on vis a vis threatening to cut this off if certain candidates are elected. Assuming Walker wins, is such a pull-out really possible?
Are new buses the wisest thing to spend stimulus money on? I mean, the old buses didn’t seem so bad to me. Are they maintenance costs really so high that this saves money? Are they able to get some money back by selling to old buses, to say, some city in Mexico?
WHY are they using a giant red flag on the cover of that book? As a daily cyclist, I get it, and I love seeing cycling becoming more popular and having better infrastructure built for it. The book sounds great. Here’s the problem:
Lest we judge a book by its flag….
There’s nothing that will set the teabag/right wingers off more that something that can be construed as socialist or communist – regardless of whether it actually is – than “revolutionary” talk and big red flags. This shouldn’t even be a political issue at all, but unfortunately, there’s a real risk that it will become one and suffer for it – especially if government money is being used for bike infrastructure and so on…. maybe I’m over-reacting, but I would have chosen a different cover and tittle for sure!
Well said. Personally I think the design is god-awful faux historic… I’d love to see the next phase radically differ in style. Fat chance of that happening, but there are worse problems to have.
The two big things that could make it really thrive are, as you suggest, a large hotel on the north end including the expanded convention space followed by a big (catalyst?) development on the lot in front of the Hilton. Would also be great if they put a green roof on it accessible to hotel guests and conventioneers alike. I know it wouldn’t add to the street but it would make a wonderful statement for those whose windows over look it!
It also occurred to me that we should stop referring to it as Madison-Milwaukee. It should be called Madison-Chicago, that will also draw more people in and emphasize the connections…
Very good thinking! Have you shared the idea with anyone in a decision making role? Frankly, I’d suggest the same brand for Wisconsin as the St. Louis one. Brings more people together, emphasizes that it’s part of a bigger system – that makes people realize it’s more useful than just a Milwaukee/Madison train – a lot of people really think that’s all it is.
Acela is a really good name…. so is ICE in Germany. Key is to avoid cliches and make it modern. … I’ll have to think about this!
The goon squad is out of control on JSonline today in the comments section. Makes me kinda sad. But who knows, maybe some last minute progress will happen!
The thing that’s important about those buildings is only partly that they’re historic – it’s that they are individualistic – this means that if and when shops and offices move in, they’ll function in a far more independent and democratic way than as tenants of a larger, more shopping-mall like building. That’s great for small business and creativity.
Now, if the buildings in question are truly unsalvagable, then so be it, but it seems like these guys are not thinking very creatively.
Super nitpickly detail – Chicago is the CAPITAL, not the CAPITOL of the midwest. The latter spelling is only used to describe the building. Easy to remeber since most capitols have domes, and domes are round, like an “o”.
Great write up. I’m not really sure the block structure, in an of itself is going to be much of a tourist attraction. Rather, it’s about good attitude, pleasant places to stroll, and a “Real-ness” which you might be able to get in milwaukee that you might not get in, say, Orlando. The next frontier in international tourism once the furthest reaches of the globe are trodden? Why not!
I’m surprised there’s not a weekend late nighter… a midnight bus might get some riders, or even a midnight train during the summer festival season, though I guess at that hour you might as well grab a hotel.
I’m happy to see more apartments downtown, but does this have to be build immediately adjacent to Yankee Hill? I think tall buildings should be spaced out a bit, to allow for views, and to allow for light to reach the street…. the placement of this doesn’t seem to be very well thought out.
Obesity & Urbanism
August 12th, 2010 at 4:24 pmMathew, SS raises a really good point. I generally agree with your argument and if you compared say, bike commuters with car commuters then there might be some interesting correlation.
But he’s right, the worst obesity in the US is in the urban black population – who typically live in compact, theoretically walkable urban neighborhoods – including much of Milwaukee. These communities may be walkable, but they are hit by the extra whammy of poverty, miserable education levels, and almost no access to anything but junk food. Ironically, in those neighborhoods the only thing you can walk to is McDonalds or the liquor store, so not having a car actually makes nutrition worse.
At the end of the day, educated and prosperous walkable areas have thinner people, but without education and prosperity, even walkability gets trumped.
High Speed Rail is Coming to Milwaukee
July 20th, 2010 at 11:55 amI’m still pretty worried about the political posturing that’s going on vis a vis threatening to cut this off if certain candidates are elected. Assuming Walker wins, is such a pull-out really possible?
MCTS Unveils New Buses
July 14th, 2010 at 9:23 pmAre new buses the wisest thing to spend stimulus money on? I mean, the old buses didn’t seem so bad to me. Are they maintenance costs really so high that this saves money? Are they able to get some money back by selling to old buses, to say, some city in Mexico?
Cream City Brick Showcase
July 10th, 2010 at 5:36 pmNice work! Great photos!
Pedaling Revolution - Book Review
May 28th, 2010 at 12:23 amWHY are they using a giant red flag on the cover of that book? As a daily cyclist, I get it, and I love seeing cycling becoming more popular and having better infrastructure built for it. The book sounds great. Here’s the problem:
Lest we judge a book by its flag….
There’s nothing that will set the teabag/right wingers off more that something that can be construed as socialist or communist – regardless of whether it actually is – than “revolutionary” talk and big red flags. This shouldn’t even be a political issue at all, but unfortunately, there’s a real risk that it will become one and suffer for it – especially if government money is being used for bike infrastructure and so on…. maybe I’m over-reacting, but I would have chosen a different cover and tittle for sure!
Rethinking and Expanding Milwaukee's Frontier Airlines Center
May 24th, 2010 at 1:32 pmWell said. Personally I think the design is god-awful faux historic… I’d love to see the next phase radically differ in style. Fat chance of that happening, but there are worse problems to have.
The two big things that could make it really thrive are, as you suggest, a large hotel on the north end including the expanded convention space followed by a big (catalyst?) development on the lot in front of the Hilton. Would also be great if they put a green roof on it accessible to hotel guests and conventioneers alike. I know it wouldn’t add to the street but it would make a wonderful statement for those whose windows over look it!
A Brand for High-Speed Rail in the Midwest
May 16th, 2010 at 11:11 amIt also occurred to me that we should stop referring to it as Madison-Milwaukee. It should be called Madison-Chicago, that will also draw more people in and emphasize the connections…
A Brand for High-Speed Rail in the Midwest
May 14th, 2010 at 12:01 pmVery good thinking! Have you shared the idea with anyone in a decision making role? Frankly, I’d suggest the same brand for Wisconsin as the St. Louis one. Brings more people together, emphasizes that it’s part of a bigger system – that makes people realize it’s more useful than just a Milwaukee/Madison train – a lot of people really think that’s all it is.
Acela is a really good name…. so is ICE in Germany. Key is to avoid cliches and make it modern. … I’ll have to think about this!
RTA Will Be a Last Minute Decision
April 22nd, 2010 at 4:24 amThe goon squad is out of control on JSonline today in the comments section. Makes me kinda sad. But who knows, maybe some last minute progress will happen!
Surface Parking Lots are a Priority to be Developed
April 6th, 2010 at 11:05 pmWell said! I I think they should tax surface lots out of existence – either donate the land for a park, or build on it!
No no no... No!
March 4th, 2010 at 3:38 pmThe thing that’s important about those buildings is only partly that they’re historic – it’s that they are individualistic – this means that if and when shops and offices move in, they’ll function in a far more independent and democratic way than as tenants of a larger, more shopping-mall like building. That’s great for small business and creativity.
Now, if the buildings in question are truly unsalvagable, then so be it, but it seems like these guys are not thinking very creatively.
No no no... No!
March 3rd, 2010 at 9:05 amGreat article! Pass it on to the JSOnline.
I’m constantly amazed at the people who think there’s a parking shortage in Milwaukee. You’re being sarcastic right?
Waukesha County Will Love High-Speed Rail
February 25th, 2010 at 6:02 pmSuper nitpickly detail – Chicago is the CAPITAL, not the CAPITOL of the midwest. The latter spelling is only used to describe the building. Easy to remeber since most capitols have domes, and domes are round, like an “o”.
School of Freshwater Sciences to the Reed Street Yards?
February 24th, 2010 at 10:29 amExcellent. That’s a great site. Really hope whatever goes there is integrated well with the rest of the are – ie, not a big parking lot.
Downtown History Presents Opportunity in Milwaukee
February 5th, 2010 at 9:39 amGreat write up. I’m not really sure the block structure, in an of itself is going to be much of a tourist attraction. Rather, it’s about good attitude, pleasant places to stroll, and a “Real-ness” which you might be able to get in milwaukee that you might not get in, say, Orlando. The next frontier in international tourism once the furthest reaches of the globe are trodden? Why not!
Could 2010 be the Year of the Park East?
January 29th, 2010 at 9:44 amIt’s looking good. That Eco-Square project looks like cabrini green, however. I’m all for eco-friendly, but don’t put it in the name!
Megabus Unveils New Bus Schedules for Milwaukee
December 9th, 2009 at 12:15 pmI’m surprised there’s not a weekend late nighter… a midnight bus might get some riders, or even a midnight train during the summer festival season, though I guess at that hour you might as well grab a hotel.
The Bookends Development is Sent Back to Committee
December 2nd, 2009 at 12:09 pmI’m happy to see more apartments downtown, but does this have to be build immediately adjacent to Yankee Hill? I think tall buildings should be spaced out a bit, to allow for views, and to allow for light to reach the street…. the placement of this doesn’t seem to be very well thought out.